[SR-Users] Via header, branch parameter and syn_branch

Hi folks The syn_branch global parameter results in the use of a "synonym" branch parameter in the Via header for statelessly forwarded requests as a performance optimisation. This was originally done by setting branch=0 which, while not strictly compliant with 3261 (8.1.1.7 and 16.6 item 8), would not cause any problems with a downstream proxy or UA compliant to either 3261 or 2543 since it does not contain the cookie and is therefore self-evidently not guaranteed to be unique. Then a patch was added (commit ebb3b08) to change it from branch=0 to branch=z9hG4bKcydzigwkX which includes the cookie, thus declaring itself to be unique when it clearly is not. This takes the optimisation too far as it deliberately misleads downstream proxies with regard to the uniqueness of the parameter and breaks the mechanism in 17.2.3 for identifying unreliable (non-unique) branch parameters for transaction matching which should then fall back to header inspection but does not. The result is that unrelated requests can be identified as duplicates of each other. Also note 3261 section 16.11 on Stateless Proxy behaviour: "The requirement for unique branch IDs across space and time applies to stateless proxies as well." Has the commit above introduced a bug and should it be reverted? And should the next major release have a default of syn_branch=0? Since with syn_branch=1 the branch=0 version has been known to cause interop issues in the past (see below) and I can confirm the branch=z9hG4bKcydzigwkX version causes interop issues in the present. Regards, Richard See also these related threads: [SR-Users] Via header branch parameter in ACK message not unique http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-December/071207.html [SR-Users] "branch" tag in the "Via" header of the ACK message for the re-INVITE http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-November/075560.html [Serusers] branch parameter http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2007-February/060147.html [SR-Users] about syn_branch http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-March/067732.html [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-May/068627.html [SR-Users] Broken Via/reply-matching for natping OPTION http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-April/068340.html [Serusers] ACK message Via field branch=0 problem http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2004-July/037731.html