24 Sep
2007
24 Sep
'07
6:35 p.m.
At 18:59 17/09/2007, Klaus Darilion wrote:
forgot to cc the list ...
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: domain name in route header
Datum: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:58:33 +0200
Von: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
An: Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>
Referenzen: <18154.37441.743333.215104(a)tutpro.com>
Juha Heinanen schrieb:
> klaus,
>
> if you want to support domains in route headers, then you need to do
> naptr and srv lookups for the domain when handling loose routing. it is
> not enough to compare the domain to the ones domain module knows about.
> domain in route header may namely be anything as long as it resolves to
> your proxy.
well, if foo.bar decides to have the DNS name pointed to
IP address of a server which doesn't know about it, that
seems to me foo.bar's problem and I'm happy to leave it
there.
I don't see issues if the domain names are condigured in reasonable
administrative context though.
for this reason, i don't like the idea of domains
in route
> headers. it hurts performance far too much.
Well I don't like the domain names in route header either, but I think the
question is how to deal with client that use it -- drop them on the floor?
I also do not like to configure openser all possible
hostnames as alias
- but it is not uncommon that the SIP domain is in the pre-loaded route
- at least most exosip based clients do that. Thus, having support for
those clients is IMO useful.
I think configuring those domains using the domain module would work just
fine, only if the rr-module would leverage it :-) I think that should be
addressed. Sounds like something that should be filed on JIRA.
-jiri
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/