Alex,
I read the OP's requirements like this. They want to implement a redirect server that
will:
*
Receive a SIP INVITE
*
Make a single http request that has a RTT of 200ms
*
Copy a header from the HTTP reply to a SIP 300 reply
*
Handle the ACK for the reply
Is it your opinion this cannot be implemented reliably with Kamailio on a 4vCPUs and 4GB
RAM host at a rate of 750 INVITE requests per second?
Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer
E: bkaufman(a)bcmone.com
SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810 | SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510 |
Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768
[img]<https://www.sip.us/>
[
img]<https://www.siptrunk.com/>
[
img]<https://www.flowroute.com/>
________________________________
From: Alex Balashov via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:17 PM
To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On Dec 19, 2024, at 1:08 pm, Ben Kaufman
<bkaufman(a)bcmone.com> wrote:
I'm arguing that http requests can be done sanely, and you're saying they
shouldn't be done at all.
Not if you want the most performance, no.
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristes…
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions --
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!