Alex,

I read the OP's requirements like this. They want to implement a redirect server that will:
Is it your opinion this cannot be implemented reliably with Kamailio on a 4vCPUs and 4GB RAM host at a rate of 750 INVITE requests per second? 


Kaufman
Senior Voice Engineer



E: bkaufman@bcmone.com




 

SIP.US Client Support: 800.566.9810  |  SIPTRUNK Client Support: 800.250.6510  |  Flowroute Client Support: 855.356.9768
img
img
img
 

From: Alex Balashov via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:17 PM
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Kamailio not receiving packets on high CPS
 
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


> On Dec 19, 2024, at 1:08 pm, Ben Kaufman <bkaufman@bcmone.com> wrote:
>
> I'm arguing that http requests can be done sanely, and you're saying they shouldn't be done at all.

Not if you want the most performance, no.

--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristesys.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cbkaufman%40bcmone.com%7Ca635628e47a64f403fb908dd205a0162%7Cafc1818e7b6848568913201b9396c4fc%7C1%7C0%7C638702293150477885%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uGXwr4TIgUW3Lyt4CROEm1n8pg7v%2FVrSGHjcACke6OQ%3D&reserved=0
Tel: +1-706-510-6800

__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!