[Serusers] problem in forwarding one proxy to another proxy

hello friends i have two ser proxies *.*.*.18 -- number is 36105 *.*.*.19 -- number is 214103 iam forwarding from *.*.*.19 to *.*.*.18 with iam using the xlite as my user agents but when i try to call from 214103 to 36105 for few seconds it says it s trying but afterwards it says it user not found ser.cfg of *.*.*.19 is as follows ******************************************************* # $Id: nathelper.cfg,v 1.1.2.1 2003/11/24 14:47:18 janakj Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script including nathelper support # This default script includes nathelper support. To make it work # you will also have to install Maxim's RTP proxy. The proxy is enforced # if one of the parties is behind a NAT. # # If you have an endpoing in the public internet which is known to # support symmetric RTP (Cisco PSTN gateway or voicemail, for example), # then you don't have to force RTP proxy. If you don't want to enforce # RTP proxy for some destinations than simply use t_relay() instead of # route(1) # # Sections marked with !! Nathelper contain modifications for nathelper # # NOTE !! This config is EXPERIMENTAL ! # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { log("********************* in the registration***************"); save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if(uri=~"^sip:3.*@") { log("***********************in forward***********************"); forward(*.*.*.18,5060); break; } else { if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; } forward(uri:host,uri:port); } }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else if (nat_uac_test("1")) { fix_nated_contact(); }; } ******************************************************* in my *.*.*.19 terminal i got this type of messages ******************************************************* 8(12167) ***********************in forward*********************** 8(12167) check_via_address(*.*.*.81, *.*.*.81, 0) 8(12167) Sending: ACK sip:36105@*.*.*.in SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:36105@*.*.*.19;ftag=3583624574;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP *.*.*.19;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP *.*.*.81:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK5D01004E4BDF4856A07BEA7C1D0EC3D5 From: rama <sip:214103@*.*.*.in>;tag=3583624574 To: <sip:36105@*.*.*.in>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-de09 Contact: <sip:214103@*.*.*.81:5060> Call-ID: C8ECA493-3AE1-4173-94AE-E33AFA5F0F93(a)*.*.*.81 CSeq: 48216 ACK Max-Forwards: 69 Content-Length: 0 . 8(12167) orig. len=425, new_len=534, proto=1 8(12167) receive_msg: cleaning up 8(12167) SIP Request: 8(12167) method: <ACK> 8(12167) uri: <sip:36105@*.*.*.in> 8(12167) version: <SIP/2.0> 8(12167) parse_headers: flags=1 8(12167) Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6 8(12167) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5D01004E4BDF4856A07BEA7C1D0EC3D5>; state=16 8(12167) end of header reached, state=5 8(12167) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 8(12167) parse_headers: this is the first via 8(12167) After parse_msg... 8(12167) preparing to run routing scripts... 8(12167) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 8(12167) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 8(12167) parse_headers: flags=128 8(12167) DEBUG: add_param: tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-de09 8(12167) end of header reached, state=29 8(12167) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [73]; uri=[sip:36105@*.*.*.in] 8(12167) DEBUG: to body [<sip:36105@*.*.*.in>] 8(12167) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <48216> <ACK> 8(12167) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70 8(12167) check_via_address(*.*.*.81, *.*.*.81, 0) 8(12167) DEBUG: add_param: tag=3583624574 8(12167) end of header reached, state=29 8(12167) parse_headers: flags=256 8(12167) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 8(12167) found end of header 8(12167) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 8(12167) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [*.*.*.19] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [*.*.*.19] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 8(12167) lookup(): '36105' Not found in usrloc 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 8(12167) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [*.*.*.19] 8(12167) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 ******************************************************* in my *.*.*.18 terminal i am getting this messages ******************************************************* 6(2291) SIP Request: 6(2291) method: <INVITE> 6(2291) uri: <sip:36105@*.*.*.in> 6(2291) version: <SIP/2.0> 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=1 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the first via 6(2291) After parse_msg... 6(2291) preparing to run routing scripts... 6(2291) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=128 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK3c48.f0b1ad35.0>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the second via 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 6(2291) Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=6 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5D01004E4BDF4856A07BEA7C1D0EC3D5>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 6(2291) end of header reached, state=9 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [31]; uri=[sip:36105@*.*.*.in] 6(2291) DEBUG: to body [<sip:36105@*.*.*.in> ] 6(2291) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <48216> <INVITE> 6(2291) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 67 6(2291) check_via_address(*.*.*.19, *.*.*.19, 0) 6(2291) DEBUG: add_param: tag=3583624574 6(2291) end of header reached, state=29 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=256 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=297 6(2291) found end of header 6(2291) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 6(2291) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [202.65.128.18] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self: host != me 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=4 , global msg id=3 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=60 6(2291) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=33987, isACK=0 6(2291) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 6(2291) DEBUG: non-ACK matched 6(2291) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x422ba740) 6(2291) DEBUG: reply retransmitted. buf=0x4006a640: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0x422bbfb8: SIP/2.0 1 6(2291) receive_msg: cleaning up 10(2295) DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x422ba8a0 next=(nil) 10(2295) DEBUG: FR_handler:stop retr. and send CANCEL (0x422ba740) 10(2295) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=408 10(2295) DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 10(2295) parse_headers: flags=-1 10(2295) check_via_address(*.*.*.19, *.*.*.19, 0) 10(2295) DEBUG: reply relayed. buf=0x80c3ec8: SIP/2.0 4..., shmem=0x422bbfb8: SIP/2.0 4 10(2295) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0x422ba818 10(2295) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0x422ba82c 10(2295) DEBUG: final_response_handler : done 10(2295) DEBUG: timer routine:7,tl=0x422ba88c next=(nil) 6(2291) SIP Request: 6(2291) method: <ACK> 6(2291) uri: <sip:36105@*.*.*.in> 6(2291) version: <SIP/2.0> 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=1 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the first via 6(2291) After parse_msg... 6(2291) preparing to run routing scripts... 6(2291) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 6(2291) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=128 6(2291) Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=6 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5D01004E4BDF4856A07BEA7C1D0EC3D5>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the second via 6(2291) DEBUG: add_param: tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-de09 6(2291) end of header reached, state=29 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [73]; uri=[sip:36105@*.*.*.in] 6(2291) DEBUG: to body [<sip:36105@*.*.*.in>] 6(2291) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <48216> <ACK> 6(2291) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 69 6(2291) check_via_address(*.*.*.19, *.*.*.19, 0) 6(2291) DEBUG: add_param: tag=3583624574 6(2291) end of header reached, state=29 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=256 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 6(2291) found end of header 6(2291) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 6(2291) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [202.65.128.18] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self: host != me 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=5 , global msg id=4 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=60 6(2291) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=33987, isACK=1 6(2291) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 6(2291) DEBUG: non-2xx ACK matched 6(2291) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x422ba740) 6(2291) DEBUG: cleanup_uacs: RETR/FR timers reset 6(2291) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0x422ba7ac 6(2291) receive_msg: cleaning up 6(2291) SIP Request: 6(2291) method: <ACK> 6(2291) uri: <sip:36105@*.*.*.in> 6(2291) version: <SIP/2.0> 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=1 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <0>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the first via 6(2291) After parse_msg... 6(2291) preparing to run routing scripts... 6(2291) DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! 6(2291) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searching for max_forwards header 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=128 6(2291) Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=6 6(2291) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5D01004E4BDF4856A07BEA7C1D0EC3D5>; state=16 6(2291) end of header reached, state=5 6(2291) parse_headers: Via found, flags=128 6(2291) parse_headers: this is the second via 6(2291) DEBUG: add_param: tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-de09 6(2291) end of header reached, state=29 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [73]; uri=[sip:36105@*.*.*.in] 6(2291) DEBUG: to body [<sip:36105@*.*.*.in>] 6(2291) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <48216> <ACK> 6(2291) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 69 6(2291) check_via_address(*.*.*.19, *.*.*.19, 0) 6(2291) DEBUG: add_param: tag=3583624574 6(2291) end of header reached, state=29 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=256 6(2291) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 6(2291) found end of header 6(2291) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 6(2291) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==9 && [*.*.*.in] == [127.0.0.1] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self - checking if host==us: 17==13 && [*.*.*.in] == [202.65.128.18] 6(2291) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 6(2291) check_self: host != me 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=6 , global msg id=5 , T on entrance=0xffffffff 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=-1 6(2291) parse_headers: flags=60 6(2291) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=33987, isACK=1 6(2291) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching 6(2291) DEBUG: non-2xx ACK matched 6(2291) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: transaction found (T=0x422ba740) 6(2291) DEBUG: cleanup_uacs: RETR/FR timers reset 6(2291) receive_msg: cleaning up 10(2295) DEBUG: timer routine:0,tl=0x422ba82c next=(nil) 10(2295) DEBUG: timer routine:4,tl=0x422ba818 next=(nil) 7(2292) udp_rcv_loop: probing packet received from *.*.*.24 35091 10(2295) DEBUG: timer routine:2,tl=0x422ba7ac next=(nil) 10(2295) DEBUG: wait_handler : removing 0x422ba740 from table 10(2295) DEBUG: delete transaction 0x422ba740 10(2295) DEBUG: wait_handler : done ******************************************************* so where iam doing wrong with regards ser diehard __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail