20 Dec
2006
20 Dec
'06
6:36 p.m.
On 12/20/06, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at > wrote:
Hi Mark!
Postgres should work well - I use it since ser 0.8. Just make sure that
the hard disk does not get full, because this breaks the index inside
postgres and postgres is getting real slow (re-create the index if it
happens).
Last time I tested openser_postgres.sh it worked fine. If you find a bug
please let us know.
Please check to use the latest versions from CVS (for 1.1 use CVS
rel_1_1_0)
The latest version from cvs doesn't work out of the box with openser build
from the release tarball, because the release tarball doesn't included
/usr/sbin/openser_gen_ha1 (although I could get past this by replacing it
with the md5sum equivelant).
However, the release tarball doesn't work because of this bug:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=151873…
So, 1. is the cvs version of rel_1_1_0 considered safe for production use?
2. if so and there are important fixes such as this in CVS, would
openser.org consider
releasing a point release containing such changes?
Thanks,
Mark Price