16 apr 2011 kl. 20.27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
On 4/16/11 7:30 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
16 apr 2011 kl. 15.59 skrev IƱaki Baz Castillo:
2011/4/15 Klaus
Darilion<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Support for various items in the
proxy/registrars:
50% path
50% outbound
33% sip/stun multiplexing
20% diversion
18% gruu
17% history-info
17% service-route
Correct me if I'm wrong:
Items implemented in Kamailio/sip-router:
- path
- diversion
Yes, Kamailio is behind and after focusing so much on the merger of the code I
think it would be good to plan some new features for a coming release.
I think this
statement is not true. While a lot of work was indeed done on merging code, there were a
lot of new featured added, much more than we had we previous major releases, many based on
standardizations (e.g., presence extensions to conference, dialog info, xcap, a.s.o).
The the core supports processing stun, see ser_stun.{c,h} - the guys at ser added that
very long time ago.
As for next release, there are lot of features added
(
http://sip-router.org/wiki/features/new-in-devel), more to come, but I think most of
developers here got tired hunting the ghosts of IETF specs that never were any useful nor
had a touch with the reality.
As of myself, I really work now on what is demanded, there is no time to jump and
implement any rfc/draft published based on theories elaborated by guys that never
implemented their specs. Moreover, some of them are now in different boat and make
"incredible" statements about sip considering their role in the past with this
protocol...
That's good feedback. I meant that we're behind the IETF. But so are most
implementations out there...
Sorry if I upset anyone. That wasn't my intention.
/O