29 Apr
2005
29 Apr
'05
11:52 a.m.
Thanks Greger.
One more question - how would I use force_send_socket()?
Do I replace t_relay() or is this just to be called at the top of the main
route block or something?
Regards,
Paul
On 4/29/05, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote:
Supported in >=0.9.0:
force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one of the
sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g. udp
message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the same
protocol is used.
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?
Hi All.
I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
follows:
eth0: 10.3.0.221 <http://10.3.0.221>
eth1: 10.2.0.42 <http://10.2.0.42>
If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
any replies out eth1?
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers