Thanks Greger.

One more question - how would I use force_send_socket()?

Do I replace t_relay() or is this just to be called at the top of the main route block or something?

Regards,
Paul

On 4/29/05, Greger V. Teigre <greger@teigre.com> wrote:
Supported in >=0.9.0:
   force_send_socket([proto:]address[:port])
       sends the message from the specified socket (it _must_ be one of the
       sockets ser listens on). If the protocol doesn't match (e.g. udp
       message "forced" to a tcp socket) the closest socket of the same
       protocol is used.
---- Original Message ----
From: Java Rockx
To: serusers
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 05:21 PM
Subject: [Serusers] Can I Force SER to Send On A Specific Network
Interface?

> Hi All.
>
> I have a multi-homed ser-0.9.1 proxy. Suppose my interfaces are as
> follows:
>
> eth0: 10.3.0.221
> eth1: 10.2.0.42
>
> If SER recieves a SIP message on eth0, how can I force SER to send
> any replies out eth1?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers@lists.iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers