21 Sep
2010
21 Sep
'10
5:25 p.m.
On 09/21/2010 11:23 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 09/21/2010 11:12 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
See this thread:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2009-October/024925.html
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was deprecated);
- all functionality of force_rtp_proxy is provided by
rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer;
- rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config.
My objection is rooted in the fact that last time I had tried to use
these functions (about 3 months ago), they still simply did not work.
I had to use force_rtp_proxy() to achieve the desired effect.
I don't remember at the moment, offhand, exactly the respects in which
they didn't work. But I've complained about it on the sr-users and
Kamailio-users list a number of times, most notably in October or
November 2009.