20 Apr
2010
20 Apr
'10
8:33 p.m.
On 4/20/10 8:29 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 4/20/10 7:30 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
^^^ I meant: it might NOT be easy ...
E.g., for forward case, detection is after config processing, when
trying to relay. If there are many branches, it is not even reported if
one branch succeeds or sends another negative reply code.
2010/4/20 Bruno
Bresciani<bruno.bresciani(a)gmail.com>om>:
it might now be easy to catch connection lost (forward or wait state
case). Hi people, this is my first time that I writing
to this list and I
nedd some
help... When kamailio lost connection with a user registred over TLS
(timeout for examlple), I want this user be unregister in kamailio
too. How
can I make this unregister?
It's a commendable feature request, but it's
not implemented right now. Also, unregistering a contact is not really following
the rfc, anyhow,
this is not something complex to add if you have the contact details.
What you can do right now is to avoid trying to send if the connection
is not longer open, see:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.0.x#set_forward_n…
Contact is in memory, but no penalty for performances. Very useful for
NAT cases or when UA is supposed to keep the connection open.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla