17 Mar
2005
17 Mar
'05
1:08 a.m.
Although I do not use Nagios I would suggest the following tests:
- send OPTIONS to your SER proxy (optionally use the SER options module to
answer the requests correctly): -s sip:proxy.address
- register with your proxy, in case with authentication: -U -s
sip:username@proxy.address -a password
- register and invite yourself: -UI -s sip:username@proxy.address -a password
If you combine all these tests you should have covered a fair amount of the
functionality of your proxy.
In any case you should use a separate username for the last two tests.
If you send OPTIONS to any registered UA, the test includes the erroneous UA
component (from your proxy to the UA). So I would not recommend that, except
if you combine it with one of the tests above.
Nils
On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:38, Rod Bacon wrote:
Can anyone help with some meaningful checks of SER
using sipsak and
Nagios? My SER box is backended with RADIUS, and I can do a "spisak -s
blah@server" and get a 200 for a registered UA, but I'd really like to
know what other generic SIP tests people are performing using sipsak and
Nagios together (perhaps a sample from your checkcommands.cfg?)
I understand that sipsak supports Nagios' return codes, which is cool, I
just need to understand how to make best use of it. Documentaion is
scarce, and extensive searching of the lists have proved largely fruitless.
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers