Hi, the commit https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6bdddb99d7bca42897b2c0f96a87c49b... solves the issue. It has been cherry-picked to 4.2 branch and it's included in version 4.2.7.
Regards,
Federico
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Vasiliy Ganchev vancecezar@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folk!
sorry for first sending to the wrong list !
Currently playing around with push notification in kamailio, have a bad case. Would appreciate any idea.
Scenario (all devices connected via TCP): UA-A - sipphone, UA-B[1] - sipphone UA-B[2] - Linphone android Server - kamailio+asterisk
UA-A call UA-B (UA-B[1] - online, UA-B[2] - offline) Kamailio make ts_store, and t_relay to UA-B[1], for UA-B[2] kamailio send push notification UA-B[2] appear registered, I make ts_append, and see kamailio sending INVITE to UA-B[2], but tansport used is UDP (expected TCP)
If I use UDP on UA-B[2] - have no issue. I am using kamailio-4.2.5, looked in sources of current master, did not found changes that could help in my scenario.
General question - does anyone has same problem using ts_append for TCP connected devices? If TCP in ts_append should work OK, any other idea?
cheers!
-- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/tsilo-and-linphone-android-connected... Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users