30 Jul
2004
30 Jul
'04
5:09 p.m.
Ehlo Bogdan,
Bogdan-Andrei IANCU writes:
list(a)chung.li wrote:
I know why but I dunno how to fix ... the fifo isn't a symlink, I tried to
change the location of the fifo, maybe is filesystem related ? I tried on
ext2 and reiserfs, I tried running ser as root and as nobody, but I got
the same issue :) so ... what you suggest ?? I need serctl work quickly so
maybe the best solution is to patch ser sources .. but I whould like to
know why eheh ...
regards
Fremen
Ehlo,
got this nice error ... anyone have any idea how to fix this ????
thanks in advance
Fremen
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: ser shutdown succeeded
Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: --Listening on
Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: 2xx.1xx.1xx.1xx
[213.173.188.175]:5060
Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: Aliases: mixer.xxx-company.xx:5060
213.173.188.175:* company.xx:* xxx:* company.xx:* mixer.xxx:*
Jul 29 19:54:23 mixer ser: ser startup succeeded
Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: security:
fifo_check: inode/dev number differ: 1073768285 -1073744848
(/tmp/ser_receiver_1077)
the reason of this error is a security check that fails - ser checks to
see if the inode of the reply_fifo didn't change to avoid possible
sym.link, rm sym.link & replace w/ fifo race.
lstat() and fstat() returns different inode number.
bogdan
Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: ps_fifo_cmd: opening
reply pipe (/tmp/ser_receiver_1077) failed
Jul 29 19:57:27 mixer /usr/sbin/ser[1048]: ERROR: fifo_server: command
(ps) processing failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers