What do you mean a 'simple' SIP-Proxy?
Is it UA -- SIPproxy -- UA?
I have also tested openser without using NAT (All device is in the
same network). But the maximum number of current calls is only around
80.
For the configuration file, I use those files download from
. I think they are the simple configuration that
I can trust.
Finally, just want to say the target usage of openser. Does it target
for a small group of users instead of a global voip environment?
On 5/30/06, Edson <4lists(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My two cents:
OpenSER/SER can handle hundreds of concurrent calls, but as a 'simple'
SIP-Proxy not as a media-proxy (RTP-Proxy). Your numbers would be
clearer if
You could aggregate information on the loads only from OpenSER/SER,
without
MediaProxy or RTPProxy. You would get some very impressive numbers,
unfortunately dropped by the [Media|RTP]proxy presence.
Try to review Your configuration, so that You forward to media-aware
servers
only calls that needed it (with one UA sitting behind a NAT
box,p.ex.), not
all. It would give a 'little' more headache for design and
maintenance, but
would permit a higher concurrent call number... ;)
Edson.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
Behalf Of unplug
Sent: segunda-feira, 29 de maio de 2006 22:23
To: Juha Heinanen
Cc: OpenSER-users
Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER dimensioning. How many calls/sec can
it set
up?
You are right that you can have 10 servers installed mediaproxy to
handle 300 concurrent calls. However, it is not a practical way to
implement a system to support several hundred concurrent calls using
several servers. As someone said, openser can handle several hundred
calls, maybe thousand. Comparing to my testing result, I have no idea
the capacity of openser can handle. Anyone can tell me the real
capacity that openser can handle?
On 5/29/06, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
> unplug writes:
>
> > mediaproxy spends much of the CPU to handle the call compared
with
> > rtpproxy. From the result that I made
in the load test, the
number
of
> > concurrent call is much much less than we expected.
> > maximum concurrent call using mediaproxy (openser & mediaproxy
in
the
>
same server): 30
> maximum concurrent call using rtpproxy (openser & rtpproxy in the
same
> > server): 60
>
> you can distribute mediaproxy to as many host you want. or are you
> saying that mediaproxy module functions
use_mediaproxy/end_mediaproxy
are the
bottleneck?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org