3 Jan
2014
3 Jan
'14
5:52 p.m.
Hi Daniel,
thanks for an answer & sorry for the delay (Christmas time).
Here we go:
Scenario: phone1(192.168.9.3, 192.168.10.75 (nat)) <--TCP-->
kamailio1(192.168.10.2) <--UDP--> kamailio2(192.168.5.3) <--UDP-->
phone2(192.168.12.2)
dialog:: hash=1456:1090244220
state:: 4
timestart:: 1388767148
timeout:: 111170022
callid:: 7fbca98b-22ea049(a)192.168.9.3
from_uri:: sip:phone1@example.com
from_tag:: 17cfe8a323b2ac11o1
caller_contact:: sip:phone1@192.168.10.75:5075;transport=tcp
caller_cseq:: 102
caller_route_set::
caller_bind_addr:: tcp:192.168.10.2:5060
to_uri:: sip:phone2@example.com
to_tag:: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c84ec059e7d
callee_contact:: sip:phone2@192.168.12.2:5060
callee_cseq:: 102
callee_route_set::
<sip:192.168.10.2;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=17cfe8a323b2ac11o1;vsf=AAAAAAAGAQIIAAIDAgh5UEBXIR0VSRIfZS5zaw--;nat=yes;did=0b5.c7ecbf04>,<sip:192.168.5.3;lr=on;did=0b5.0b>
callee_bind_addr:: udp:192.168.10.2:5060
Efelin
2013/12/11 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
On 12/11/2013 03:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
there must not be any route for proxy itself, even when BYE is sent by
end UA the Route is consumed by proxy, so it is
no difference from this
perspective.
Oh, yeah. [slaps head] That's true. You and Carsten are correct.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users