Hi Daniel,
thanks for an answer & sorry for the delay (Christmas time).
Here we go:
Scenario: phone1(192.168.9.3, 192.168.10.75 (nat)) <--TCP--> kamailio1(192.168.10.2) <--UDP--> kamailio2(192.168.5.3) <--UDP--> phone2(192.168.12.2)
dialog:: hash=1456:1090244220 state:: 4 timestart:: 1388767148 timeout:: 111170022 callid:: 7fbca98b-22ea049@192.168.9.3 from_uri:: sip:phone1@example.com from_tag:: 17cfe8a323b2ac11o1 caller_contact:: sip:phone1@192.168.10.75:5075;transport=tcp caller_cseq:: 102 caller_route_set:: caller_bind_addr:: tcp:192.168.10.2:5060 to_uri:: sip:phone2@example.com to_tag:: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c84ec059e7d callee_contact:: sip:phone2@192.168.12.2:5060 callee_cseq:: 102 callee_route_set:: sip:192.168.10.2;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=17cfe8a323b2ac11o1;vsf=AAAAAAAGAQIIAAIDAgh5UEBXIR0VSRIfZS5zaw--;nat=yes;did=0b5.c7ecbf04,sip:192.168.5.3;lr=on;did=0b5.0b callee_bind_addr:: udp:192.168.10.2:5060
Efelin
2013/12/11 Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com
On 12/11/2013 03:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
there must not be any route for proxy itself, even when BYE is sent by
end UA the Route is consumed by proxy, so it is no difference from this perspective.
Oh, yeah. [slaps head] That's true. You and Carsten are correct.
-- Alex
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users