At 04:55 PM 3/18/2003, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel Sullivan writes:
Is it possible for SER to forward a call to another phone if the recipient does not answer?
It is easy if the on_no_response destination is not individualized, e.g., if any_username@iptel.org gets reforwarded to any_username@voicemail.iptel.org. That's what t_on_negative and reply_route ser script constructs are good for.
It is not easy know if the on_no_response addresses are individualized (e.g., jiri->1234, Dan->4321).
this could be achieved with sequential forking (by trying contacts in decreasing q order), but sequential forking is not yet supported in ser.
Serial forking as such is supported. The missing piece is (see above) keeping the individualized addresses, be it through user profile or multiple registrations with different q values. We will probably try to address it in overnext release; it will unfortunately not fit in the upcoming release.
-Jiri