18 Mar
2003
18 Mar
'03
3:52 p.m.
Hello friends,
Is it possible for SER to forward a call to another phone if the recipient
does not answer?
Thanks,
Dan
18 Mar
18 Mar
3:55 p.m.
Daniel Sullivan writes:
Is it possible for SER to forward a call to another
phone if the recipient
does not answer?
this could be achieved with sequential forking (by trying contacts in
decreasing q order), but sequential forking is not yet supported in ser.
-- juha
5:01 p.m.
Is it possible to forward to another
user if the current user is busy?
Like a hunt group?
---greg
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-admin(a)lists.iptel.org
[mailto:serusers-admin@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Juha Heinanen
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Daniel Sullivan
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] call forward on no answer
Daniel Sullivan writes:
Is it possible for SER to forward a call to
another phone
if the recipient
does not answer?
this could be achieved with sequential forking (by trying contacts in
decreasing q order), but sequential forking is not yet
supported in ser.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
5:18 p.m.
Greg Fausak writes:
Is it possible to forward to another
user if the current user is busy?
Like a hunt group?
you can do these kind of functions in many different places of the
system. the proxy works on contact information based on q values, your
sip phone can have such a forwarding feature, and finally, you can have
someking of ip pbx (softswitch) that does it and from sip's point of
view is a back-to-back sip ua.
-- juha
5:03 p.m.
At 04:55 PM 3/18/2003, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel Sullivan writes:
> Is it possible for SER to forward a call to another phone if the recipient
> does not answer?
It is easy if the on_no_response destination is not individualized, e.g., if
any_username(a)iptel.org gets reforwarded to any_username(a)voicemail.iptel.org.
That's what t_on_negative and reply_route ser script constructs are good for.
It is not easy know if the on_no_response addresses are individualized
(e.g., jiri->1234, Dan->4321).
this could be achieved with sequential forking (by
trying contacts in
decreasing q order), but sequential forking is not yet supported in ser.
Serial forking as such is supported. The missing piece is (see above)
keeping the individualized addresses, be it through user profile or
multiple registrations with different q values. We will probably try
to address it in overnext release; it will unfortunately not fit in the
upcoming release.
-Jiri
7876
days inactive
7876
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel Sullivan -
Greg Fausak -
Jiri Kuthan -
Juha Heinanen