Hi,
My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return
value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always
explicitly return 1 or exit.
—
Muhammad.
On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.
I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.
Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route. In some
cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching
headers.
Documentation in
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#
return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements,
the route should return 1. However, this route appears to be returning
-1.
My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value,
and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return
-1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core
cookbook indicates?
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org