Hi,

My understanding is that return value of last statement becomes the return value of named route if none explicitly specified. Therefore i always explicitly return 1 or exit.

—
Muhammad.

On Tue 20. Feb 2018 at 22:48, Jeff Bilyk <jbilyk@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

Running into odd behaviour in Kamailio 5.0.2 and I'm hoping to clarify.  I have a simple route that uses the textops functions subst and remove_hf.  Other than that, there is nothing else done within the route.  In some cases, the remove_hf function returns false as there are no matching headers.

Documentation in https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.0.x/core#return seems to show that if there are no explicit return statements, the route should return 1.  However, this route appears to be returning -1.  

My question is: if a function within a route returns a negative value, and there are no explicit return statements, will the entire route return -1 (as it appears is happening), or should the route return 1 as the core cookbook indicates?

Thanks in advance,

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users