2 Apr
2004
2 Apr
'04
2:02 a.m.
Hi Jiri
Thanks for the advice - it works perfectly now. I must say that out of the
many Uas I have played with - more of them screw the tags up than less.
Thanks again for the help.
Cheers
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: 01 April 2004 05:50 PM
To: Jason Penton
Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
At 09:22 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
theoretically remove
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
Sent: 01 April 2004 09:17 AM
To: Jason Penton
Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
At 09:10 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
So then to fix the problem I am having - I could Hi Jiri
Yes - I have. BUT I was under the impression that the 180 RINGING
response is not REQUIRED to have a to-tag i.e. to set up an
early dialog.
Is this understanding correct?
indeed, to-tags serve the purpose if establishing a dialog.
180 does not establish any, only 183 does. the to-tags from all incoming 180 RINGING
responses before
forwarding
them to the UAC and my problem should be solved.
you could, but it sounds to me like a too terrible hack.
Now my second quesiton is where in
the SER code can I do this (first assumption is in the tm module
??????)
now, message mangling is done in textops. You need to set up
stateful processing (t_on_reply), process replies, look at
which you wish to mangle and eventually mangle them.
-jiri