Hi Jiri
Thanks for the advice - it works perfectly now. I must say that out of the many Uas I have played with - more of them screw the tags up than less.
Thanks again for the help.
Cheers Jason
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: 01 April 2004 05:50 PM To: Jason Penton Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
At 09:22 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: 01 April 2004 09:17 AM To: Jason Penton Subject: RE: [Serdev] Rmoving to-tags
At 09:10 AM 4/1/2004, Jason Penton wrote:
Hi Jiri
Yes - I have. BUT I was under the impression that the 180 RINGING response is not REQUIRED to have a to-tag i.e. to set up an
early dialog.
Is this understanding correct?
indeed, to-tags serve the purpose if establishing a dialog. 180 does not establish any, only 183 does.
So then to fix the problem I am having - I could
theoretically remove
the to-tags from all incoming 180 RINGING responses before
forwarding
them to the UAC and my problem should be solved.
you could, but it sounds to me like a too terrible hack.
Now my second quesiton is where in the SER code can I do this (first assumption is in the tm module ??????)
now, message mangling is done in textops. You need to set up stateful processing (t_on_reply), process replies, look at which you wish to mangle and eventually mangle them.
-jiri