Re: [SR-Users] limits in hashtable

Hi Fabian, just some notes, as it could be different causes. The hash table size (2^16) is just for the number of hash buckets; it can of course hold more values than this. Have e.g., a look to Wikipedia for the hash table data structure concepts. So, the hash table should be able to hold all of your values, it is a widely used data structure in kamailio cfg from many people. Have a look to the log files of kamailio to see if you get maybe some memory error (the hash table is stored in shared memory). The other error you quoted below related to the hash table dump command, this can happen especially for large tables. These RPC commands are usually not meant to dump frequently really large tables, more for debugging etc.. Some modules provide a second command for more optimized dump of data. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com -----Original Message----- From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Fabian Borot Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 8:59 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] limits in hashtable Hi I have a hashtable with about 2500 elements in it. Some of the key_names are the same and in the config file and I traverse them using the index. The problem that I am having is that not all the values are loaded into memory. Lets say I have 5 entries with key_name and key_values like this: 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10 --> 0001232555690 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10 --> 0004562555691 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10 --> 0007892555692 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10 --> 0003212555693 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10 --> 0006542555694 when I do this kamcmd htable.get mytable 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10[0] kamcmd htable.get mytable 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10[1] kamcmd htable.get mytable 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10[2] kamcmd htable.get mytable 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10[3] kamcmd htable.get mytable 1.2.34:5060:10.10.10[4] I am supposed to get their values on the console but sometimes I can not get the 3rd or 4th value , instead I receive this error error: 500 - Key name doesn't exist in htable. What I have been doing so far is to delete extra/old keys from the physical hashtable and load the values again and then it works for a few days. But there is a process that adds entries to the hashtable and at some point it breaks again and I have to delete again old/unused ones. I can not use 'expire' here because the time it takes to become "old" is unknown/variable. This is how the table is defined..2^16 is more than enough to hold 2500 values. What am I missing here? modparam("htable", "htable", "a=>size=16;autoexpire=0;dbtable=htable;") I have taken pcap captures between the kamailio server and the db and I see all the values being transferred over the network when the kamailio is loading/refreshing the values from the db. Is there another limit somewhere? Also when I try to dump the values I get 'reply too big'. modparam("ctl", "binrpc_max_body_size", 10240) modparam("ctl", "binrpc_struct_max_body_size",10240) ./kamcmd htable.dump a ERROR: reply too big any assistance is highly appreciated fborot   _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users