Re: [SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS

Hi Alex, We set the hash size to 32 MB and found that the hash size is not the same as configured one. At the max it was taking 64KB. Regards, Shankar Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:27:29 -0500 From: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS Message-ID: <52EF28C1.5010204(a)evaristesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed On 02/03/2014 12:22 AM, Shankar wrote: How did you arrive at that conclusion? -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/ From: Shankar [mailto:shankar.rk@plintron.com] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:53 AM To: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List' Subject: Regd. MAX_LDG_LOCKS Hello, Can anyone brief about MAX_LDG_LOCKS in dlg_hash.c? Should I increase the value of MAX_LDG_LOCKS (hardcoded to 2048) if the hash size is increased? Also we found that in 'dialog.c' the variable dlg_hash_size should be 'unsigned int'. Hope this will be taken care in next release of Kamailio. Regards, Shankar