22 May
2007
22 May
'07
7:44 a.m.
Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and
when people accept the nominations.
Let me start:
I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
SER), N. (sip(a)arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider installations).
As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
representative/developer, I only nominate four.
g-)
SIP wrote:
You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site
somewhere to keep track
of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
deciding their votes. Just an idea.
I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
stuff! Seconded? ;)
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
Why should voting be secret? We strive openness
and transparency in
decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
rationale in order to prefer it.
g-)
------- Original message -------
From: Martin Hoffmann <hn(a)nvnc.de>
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, serdev(a)lists.iptel.org, semsdev(a)iptel.org
Sent: 18.5.'07, 10:54
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I have received private questions on how to
nominate and vote. My
interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
posting to the list.
I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
secret.
Regards,
Martin