Just in continue of the discussion forund in the RFC3261 12.1.2 (UAC behaivor) this:
The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI from the Contact header field of the response.
2018-07-01 11:48 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko ovoshlook@gmail.com:
Hm... Nice guess I will try to check it Thank you so much for clarify these things Alex!
2018-07-01 11:35 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
So FS in this case ignores single route header and sends request to the Provider Contact....
If so, that's wrong.
I suppose it's possible that it matches the next hop based on IP address alone and not port, but that's radioactively incorrect.
-- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users