2 Jul
2018
2 Jul
'18
7:03 a.m.
Just in continue of the discussion
forund in the RFC3261 12.1.2 (UAC behaivor) this:
The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route
header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving
all URI parameters. If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
2018-07-01 11:48 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hm... Nice guess
I will try to check it
Thank you so much for clarify these things Alex!
2018-07-01 11:35 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 11:27:36AM +0300, Yuriy
Gorlichenko wrote:
So FS in this case ignores single route header
and sends request to the
Provider Contact....
If so, that's wrong.
I suppose it's possible that it matches the next hop based on IP address
alone and not port, but that's radioactively incorrect.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users