[SR-Users] Who is at Astricon?

I am. On 10/25/11, sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org <sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org> wrote: > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 2. Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:44:06 +0200 > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) > To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Message-ID: <4EA78206.4060203(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > Hello, > > On 10/25/11 5:52 PM, Asgaroth wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for the clarrification, >> >> On 25/10/2011 16:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> >>> >>> 4.6. |ds_mark_dst("s")| >>> >>> Mark the last used address from destination set as inactive >>> ("i"/"I"/"0"), active ("a"/"A"/"1") or probing ("p"/"P"/"2"). With >>> this function, an automatic detection of failed gateways can be >>> implemented. When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it >>> will be ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'. >>> >> >> Above is the part that is a little misleading, it says that >> >> "When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it will be ignored >> by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'." >> >> This, to me, means that if a gateway is in probing mode >> (Active-Probing) then it wont be selected in the destination set >> because it is in probing mode, if this is not the case then maybe the >> above line should read: >> >> "When an address is marked as inactive or inactive-probing, it will be >> ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'." >> >> This brings me to my next question then, how would I set the state of >> a destination to Inactive-Probing (state: IP) from the routing script. >> The ds_mark_dst() function only allows one of "a", "i", "p". >> >> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i"), then the state changes to "IX", Inactive >> with no probing to tell when gateway is back up. >> >> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i") and then right after ds_mark_dst("p"), a >> log is printed saying that you cannot put a destination into probing >> state when it is marked as inactive. > are you sure you run the devel version? There is no such case in the > sources -- send me exactly the log message you get. Only when the > destination is disabled the probing cannot be set, but not the same case > of inactive. > >> >> Is it possible to set the state of a gateway to inactive-probing from >> the routing script? > > Yes, it should be, no constraint in master branch source code. > > Daniel > >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > >