30 Apr
2010
30 Apr
'10
11:37 a.m.
2010/4/30 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
200 OK seems correct as long as the transaction is
still in memory.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.2
I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an
INVITE the transaction is terminated so a CANCEL after the 200 should
not match such transaction. Then the proxy should reply 481 to the
CANCEL rather than a 200.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>