10 May
2006
10 May
'06
4:28 p.m.
I use this kind of clustering, but there is a performance penalty. Not so
high, but...
Also, in the meantime, how about try a double-chained t_replicate
configuration in conjunction with DB cache? In case of a double replication,
I understand that it would only update the DB. Am I thinking in a, at least,
reasonable way?
Edson.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
Behalf Of Andreas Granig
Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de maio de 2006 17:01
To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] clustering
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
yes, that's right - I will take a look to see
how difficult is to change
t_replicate() to be able to sent to more destinations in parallel.
I'd really encourage everybody evaluating a clustered solution to try
cacheless usrloc in combination with mysql-cluster. Scales very well,
without the side-effect of inevitable usrloc inconsistency...
Just my 2 cents,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users