Thanks for the idea.
After sending the original email I got user2 to call through to user1. Zrtp even was
negotiated. So I think usrloc is sort of sharing the registration information but
sometimes the call doesn't get sent through under certain circumstances.
Maybe it's because user1 is behind a nat and rtpproxy is being used to keep its
connection alive while user2 is not nat'd.
I think it is almost working.
-----Original Message-----
From: David | StyleFlare <david(a)styleflare.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:27:06
To: <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] 2 kamailio servers sharing one database and one dns
name
I dont think it works like that, obviously the server 1 does not have a connection if the
user is registered on server 2.
On 3/19/13 11:05 PM, David Thomson wrote:
hi,
I have two kamailio 3.3.4 servers sharing one database. usrloc module is loaded on both
machines. The DNS name for the machines is shared (i.e
siptest.testdomain.com with 2
public ip's - one for Server1 and one for Server2) and setup in round robin mode.
The scenario is as follows:
User 1 registers to Server1
User 2 registers to Server2
User1 tries to call User2 but Server1 throws an error and the call doesn't ever
connect to User2:
WARNING: usrloc [udomain.c:321]: non-local socket
<udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060> <udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060> ...ignoring.
Any ideas?
ttyl,
Dave
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users