On Wednesday 10 May 2006 04:00, Andreas Granig wrote:
Could you use a cached usrloc with a low enough update interval? Or does
OpenSER only write it's information to the database at that interval, not
read?
Also, cacheless usrloc is only available in the devel version, correct?
Thanks.
---Mike
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
yes, that's right - I will take a look to see
how difficult is to change
t_replicate() to be able to sent to more destinations in parallel.
I'd really encourage everybody evaluating a clustered solution to try
cacheless usrloc in combination with mysql-cluster. Scales very well,
without the side-effect of inevitable usrloc inconsistency...
Just my 2 cents,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users