26 Dec
2013
26 Dec
'13
6:35 a.m.
Hi guys,
was this issue resolved?
I encountered this issue also (4.0.5), in failure_route, i used
t_reply("404","not found")
never sent out, instead i get this in logs,
WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't
release transaction
Kelvin Chua
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
the backtrace is ok for the moment. I will look over it and come back with
results.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/25/13 12:10 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi Daniel,
sorry it took me more than I expected. Is this sufficient? Meanwhile I
found out that this happens when fr_inv_timer triggers and dialog module is
turned on.
Backtrace:
bt
#0 futex_release (lock=0xb4b90798) at ../../mem/../futexlock.h:137
#1 next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg@entry=0xb4bc5a38, event=event@entry=4,
old_state=old_state@entry=0xbfef08a0, new_state=new_state@entry=0xbfef089c,
unref=unref@entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:950
#2 0xb6b05479 in dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576,
param=0xbfef097c) at dlg_handlers.c:469
#3 0xb6cc2336 in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28,
type=type@entry=1048576, trans=0xb4bc5ce8, params=params@entry=0xbfef097c)
at t_hooks.c:290
#4 0xb6cc25da in run_trans_callbacks_with_buf (type=type@entry=1048576,
rbuf=rbuf@entry=0xb4bc5d54, req=req@entry=0xb4bc6a08, repl=repl@entry=0xffffffff,
flags=flags@entry=505) at t_hooks.c:336
#5 0xb6cee953 in _reply_light (trans=trans@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
buf=0xb731f588 "SIP/2.0 505 Error\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.21.4;branch=z9hG4bKa6f5.8ca73657.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.0.95;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKBc143aFe81jDj\r\nFrom: \"USER\" <
sip:USER@10.0.0.95>;t"..., len=len@entry=434, code=code@entry=505,
lock=0, bm=0xbfef0e48, to_tag_len=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf
expression opcode 0xfa>,
to_tag=<error reading variable: Unhandled dwarf expression opcode
0xfa>) at t_reply.c:628
#6 0xb6ceedeb in _reply (trans=0xb4bc5ce8, trans@entry=0x1f9,
p_msg=p_msg@entry=0xb731f568, code=505, text=0xb731f568 "Error", lock=0)
at t_reply.c:782
#7 0xb6ceefd7 in t_reply_unsafe (t=0x1f9, t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
p_msg=0xb731f568, p_msg@entry=0xb6d196c0, code=0, text=text@entry=0xb731f568
"Error") at t_reply.c:1531
#8 0xb6cd6904 in w_t_reply (msg=0xb6d196c0, p1=0xb731c988 "8]0\267\001",
p2=0xb731c9b8 "8P0\267 ") at tm.c:1283
#9 0x080651cf in do_action (h=h@entry=0xbfef1258, a=a@entry=0xb7305d98,
msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1080
#10 0x08064137 in run_actions (h=h@entry=0xbfef1258, a=a@entry=0xb73053c8,
msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0) at action.c:1573
#11 0x0806cedd in run_top_route (a=0xb73053c8, msg=msg@entry=0xb6d196c0,
c=c@entry=0x0) at action.c:1658
#12 0xb6ceba98 in run_failure_handlers (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
rpl=0xffffffff, code=408, extra_flags=96) at t_reply.c:1028
#13 0xb6cece22 in t_should_relay_response (Trans=Trans@entry=0xb4bc5ce8,
new_code=new_code@entry=408, branch=branch@entry=0,
should_store=should_store@entry=0xbfef1464,
should_relay=should_relay@entry=0xbfef1460,
cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0xbfef1510, reply=reply@entry=0xffffffff)
at t_reply.c:1304
#14 0xb6cef076 in relay_reply (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8, p_msg=p_msg@entry=0xffffffff,
branch=branch@entry=0, msg_status=msg_status@entry=408,
cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0xbfef1510,
do_put_on_wait=do_put_on_wait@entry=0) at t_reply.c:1707
#15 0xb6cc28b4 in fake_reply (t=t@entry=0xb4bc5ce8, branch=0,
code=code@entry=408) at timer.c:354
#16 0xb6cc34b0 in final_response_handler (t=0xb4bc5ce8, r_buf=0xb4bc5dc8)
at timer.c:526
#17 retr_buf_handler (ticks=272914717, tl=0xb4bc5ddc, p=0x3e8) at
timer.c:584
#18 0x08183325 in timer_list_expire (slow_mark=12, slow_l=0xb49f2438,
h=0xb49f2338, t=272914717) at timer.c:894
#19 timer_handler () at timer.c:959
#20 timer_main () at timer.c:998
#21 0x080b8c65 in main_loop () at main.c:1709
#22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
(I have changed USER and IP address to hide my network :))
After this when I hit 'n' multiple times I got following output in
infinite loop:
22 0x08063bfe in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfef1844) at main.c:2566
(gdb) n
next_state_dlg (dlg=dlg@entry=0xb4bc5a38, event=event@entry=4,
old_state=old_state@entry=0xbfef08a0, new_state=new_state@entry=0xbfef089c,
unref=unref@entry=0xbfef08a4) at dlg_hash.c:952
952 LM_DBG("dialog %p changed from state %d to "
(gdb)
955 }
(gdb)
dlg_onreply (t=0xb4bc5ce8, type=1048576, param=0xbfef097c) at
dlg_handlers.c:470
470 dlg_run_event_route(dlg, (rpl==FAKED_REPLY)?NULL:rpl,
old_state, new_state);
(gdb)
472 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) {
(gdb)
479 if (new_state==DLG_STATE_CONFIRMED_NA &&
(gdb)
540 if ( new_state==DLG_STATE_DELETED
(gdb)
542 || old_state==DLG_STATE_EARLY) ) {
(gdb)
541 && (old_state==DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED
(gdb)
559 if (unref) dlg_unref(dlg, unref);
(gdb)
563 dlg_release(dlg);
(gdb)
565 }
(gdb)
run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0xb4bc5d28, type=type@entry=1048576,
trans=0xb4bc5ce8, params=params@entry=0xbfef097c) at t_hooks.c:292
292 cbp=cbp->next;
(gdb)
283 while(cbp){
(gdb)
286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
(gdb)
292 cbp=cbp->next;
(gdb)
283 while(cbp){
(gdb)
286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
(gdb)
287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d entered\n",
(gdb)
290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
(gdb)
289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
(gdb)
290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
(gdb)
292 cbp=cbp->next;
(gdb)
283 while(cbp){
(gdb)
286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
(gdb)
292 cbp=cbp->next;
(gdb)
283 while(cbp){
(gdb)
286 if ( (cbp->types)&type ) {
(gdb)
287 DBG("DBG: trans=%p, callback type %d, id %d entered\n",
(gdb)
290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
(gdb)
289 params->param = &(cbp->param);
(gdb)
290 cbp->callback( trans, type, params );
(gdb)
292 cbp=cbp->next;
(gdb)
283 while(cbp){
Regards
Efelin
2013/11/20 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Hello,
I will investigate more -- meanwhile had some traveling. It would speed
up if you can send the backtrace of one process that blocks when you
applied the patch.
You need to connect with gdb to it:
gdb /path/to/kamailio _PID_
replace _PID_ with the pid of blocked kamailio process.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/15/13 5:50 PM, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for a reply. I applied the patch and now the Kamailio just prints
WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1564]: t_unref(): WARNING: script writer didn't
release transaction
and than freezes without any log. It does not resend the incoming
"winning" failure reply neither response to any other messages, not even to
a new calls. It just freezes. All kamailio processes are running and eating
the whole 4-core processor.
Restart of Kamailio solves this problem.
Any ideas how to continue with debug?
Thanks
Efelin
2013/11/15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello,
can you try attached patch?
Let me know if all goes fine and I will commit it to the repository.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/15/13 10:25 AM, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi,
when I use t_reply("505", "Error"); in my failure route, the
response
is not forwarded and following is written into a log:
kamailio[26216]: WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1559]: t_unref(): WARNING:
script writer didn't release transaction
plus next line is written exactly 416000 times into a log afterwards:
kamailio[32685]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:794]:
log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 4 in state 5 for dlg 0xb4af6588
[2575:7017] with clid '121d44f0-6555f4c8' and tags 'd12546d053aadc68o2'
''
My point is to change the incoming code from users and append a Q.850
reason code.
Is there any other way how to do this or a way how to fix this?
I'm using Kamilio 4.0.4 on Debian 7.1
The code is as follows:
failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]
{
if (t_is_canceled()) {
exit;
}
if($T_reply_code == 408 && isflagset(10))
{
xlog("Ringing timeout");
append_to_reply("Reason: Q.850;cause=28\r\n");
t_reply("505", "Error");
}
}
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -