24 Apr
2003
24 Apr
'03
3:51 a.m.
Hi,
On Thursday 24 April 2003 03:32, jimmy_huang wrote:
Hi ,
In Ser's Makefile.defs , originally , it define PKG_MALLOC , SHM_MEM ,
SHM_MMAP ,for shared memory,
and I would like to marked it , cause i want to try let it not use shared
memory
Question for my personal intereset: why do you want to do it?
(and modified ser.cfg let it just produce one main
parent process )
Modifing ser.cfg will never result in just one process, because
their is
allways a timer process.
I tried marked those three definitions , but it has
error when compile ,
it seems some modules still need functions which only exist when those
three definitions is defined,
do those three definitions can't marked?
or in ser , it can't work without using shared memory , can't mark those
definition?
It hardly depends on the modules you use. But usrloc for example will
not work
without shared memory. And i think also tm will not work without shared
memory.
So if do not use any module which needs shared mem you will probably end up
with a stateless SIP proxy with not many features.
Conclusion: it could theoreticly be possible to use Ser without shared mem
with probably a lot code changes. Allthough i do not understand the intention
for this goal and the result would be unsatisfactoy in terms of performance,
features etc.
Greetings
Nils