Actually, I was looking at the code yesterday, trying to figure it if it's just a validation, to not accept reply_route(), or if it needs some more logic to work inside that block. It's still an option.
Best regards,
Luis
On 4/9/20 4:25 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 09.04.20 09:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
[...]
Any idea why Async is not allowed in reply_route()?
Didn't notice this question in the first place to respond in my previous email.
Probably the developer that did it needed it for SIP requests. However, you can make a patch (pull request) to make it work for other cases. The developers will review the changes and if they don't break anything, it will be merged.
Cheers, Daniel
.