9 Apr
2020
9 Apr
'20
10:25 a.m.
On 09.04.20 09:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
[...]
>
> Any idea why Async is not allowed in reply_route()?
>
Didn't notice this question in the first place to respond in my previous
email.
Probably the developer that did it needed it for SIP requests. However,
you can make a patch (pull request) to make it work for other cases. The
developers will review the changes and if they don't break anything, it
will be merged.
Cheers,
Daniel
9 Apr
9 Apr
2:21 p.m.
New subject: Kamailio propagates 180 and 200 OK OUT OF ORDER
Actually, I was looking at the code yesterday, trying to figure it if
it's just a validation, to not accept reply_route(), or if it needs some
more logic to work inside that block. It's still an option.
Best regards,
Luis
On 4/9/20 4:25 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 09.04.20 09:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
--
Luis Rojas
Software Architect
Sixbell
Los Leones 1200
Providencia
Santiago, Chile
Phone: (+56-2) 22001288
mailto:luis.rojas@sixbell.com
http://www.sixbell.com
[...]
> Any idea why Async is not allowed in reply_route()?
>
Didn't notice this question in the first place to respond in my previous
email.
Probably the developer that did it needed it for SIP requests. However,
you can make a patch (pull request) to make it work for other cases. The
developers will review the changes and if they don't break anything, it
will be merged.
Cheers,
Daniel
.
1488
days inactive
1488
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Luis Rojas G.