Re: [SR-Users] [TOPOH] Contact header for 302 Moved Temporarily

Yep, got same problem. Not sure it’s a bug, but seems to be topoh module is really lack some configuration. 2016-02-12 21:13 GMT+02:00 SamyGo &lt;govoiper(a)gmail.com <mailto:govoiper@gmail.com>>: Hi All, I've recently stumbled upon this little hitch while using kamailio with topoh module that the Contact header do not contains the User part for the 302 Moved temporarily packet. _My topology:_ UserA<====\ ->Kamailio<===>FreeSwitch UserB<====/ The B party has set Call forwarding on their phone hence phone sends a 302 Moved Temporarily to Kamailio. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0767.4e4e57deca89da5c5f5ae97228325f85.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycM.y7MGZLMGZwM.1LgRWIC9gIgx4fMGZAOBVAOBNfzuaVHRaYpB1LNSQLpx4uMx3Az6eL3RsBCxu-zRrUWSeOgjeBk.IVm4ds34aONc** From: "+4319714111 <tel:%2B4319714111>" <sip:+4319714111 <tel:%2B4319714111>@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K To: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;tag=105223296 Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc CSeq: 87257355 INVITE Contact: <sip:06606017597@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE:5060> User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70 Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional Content-Length: 0 This is modified in Kamailio TOPOH and sent to FreeSwitch as following SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.20.71;received=10.0.20.71;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKeBcy9HKK9cDKr From: "+4319714111 <tel:%2B4319714111>" <sip:+4319714111 <tel:%2B4319714111>@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K To: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;tag=105223296 Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc CSeq: 87257355 INVITE Contact: <*sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**> User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70 Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional Content-Length: 0 Which results in a Call Originate from FreeSwitch with RURI as this: INVITE *sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP*;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My** SIP/2.0 I am thinking that in TOPOH Module some patch is required to atleast retain the $rU for 3XX replies , not sure if this will break some RFC or Kamailio stability etc ! Thanks, Sammy. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Best regards, Igor _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users