Hello,

isn't the username then decoded from the value of

sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**

In other words, when the follow up invite in Kamailio comes, can you print the value of $ru with xlog and see if it has username?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 16/02/16 22:54, Igor Olhovskiy wrote:
Yep, got same problem.
Not sure it’s a bug, but seems to be topoh module is really lack some configuration.

2016-02-12 21:13 GMT+02:00 SamyGo <govoiper@gmail.com>:
Hi All,
I've recently stumbled upon this little hitch while using kamailio with topoh module that the Contact header do not contains the User part for the 302 Moved temporarily packet. 

My topology:
UserA<====\ 
                    ->Kamailio<===>FreeSwitch
UserB<====/

The B party has set Call forwarding on their phone hence phone sends a 302 Moved Temporarily to Kamailio. 


Via: SIP/2.0/UDP TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0767.4e4e57deca89da5c5f5ae97228325f85.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycM.y7MGZLMGZwM.1LgRWIC9gIgx4fMGZAOBVAOBNfzuaVHRaYpB1LNSQLpx4uMx3Az6eL3RsBCxu-zRrUWSeOgjeBk.IVm4ds34aONc**
From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional
Content-Length: 0

This is modified in Kamailio TOPOH and sent to FreeSwitch as following
SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.20.71;received=10.0.20.71;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKeBcy9HKK9cDKr
From: "+4319714111" <sip:+4319714111@FREESWITCH.IP.HERE>;tag=yUr5UZ7eF794K
Call-ID: cd811276-4b4d-1234-66ae-005056867dbc
CSeq: 87257355 INVITE
Contact: <sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My**>
User-Agent: Yealink SIP-T46G 28.80.0.70
Diversion: <sip:502@USER.B.IP.HERE:5060>;reason=unconditional
Content-Length: 0


Which results in a Call Originate from FreeSwitch with RURI as this:

INVITE sip:TOPOH.KAMAILIO.IP;line=sr-N6IAzBy6WBy6MxFwW.qwPSW5ohWINhaYNLu4g9W4OhWI3wKLgRsIpUg5kGs7g9P-W.y6My** SIP/2.0


I am thinking that in TOPOH Module some patch is required to atleast retain the $rU for 3XX replies , not sure if this will break some RFC or Kamailio stability etc !


Thanks,
Sammy.


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




--
Best regards,
Igor


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
http://miconda.eu