Re: [Serusers] gflags

It is true, it is not elegant, but its a stepping stone, I will migrate to a full sql based version in due course, now that I know the settings in the db work as I want them to, in fact all I need to do is to work out howto map username ---> grp ---> package ----> prefixes allowed and denied first 3 steps seem fine, the last one, is one I dont like...am sure theres a way Iqbal On 11/6/2005, "sip" <sip(a)arcdiv.com> wrote: >I don't know, Iqbal... I can't imagine any situation in which you need more >than 32 different flags set/checked to be one of efficiency or elegance. ;) > >I wouldn't want to see THAT config file. > >N. > > >On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:11:40 GMT, Iqbal wrote >> tks I was going to use them to replace setflags in some cases, simply >> because i can use more than 32 of them >> >> Iqbal >> >> On 11/6/2005, "Greger V. Teigre" <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote: >> >> >gflags is ... global, i.e. completely different purpose. Ex. test for >> >global flag 1 before every xlog. Then you can turn debugging on and off >> >without restarting ser. >> >g-) >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "Iqbal" <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk> >> >To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> >> >Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:33 PM >> >Subject: [Serusers] gflags >> > >> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> Can I just replace flag usage with gflag usage within my config, or are >> >> there any caveats >> >> >> >> Iqbal >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Serusers mailing list >> >> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >