24 May
2012
24 May
'12
6:26 p.m.
Hello,
On 5/24/12 11:36 AM, Laurent Schweizer wrote:
Hello all,
I see the new timeout notification feature from the rtpproxy when no
voice traffic is detected.
do you mean the patch from the rtpproxy module?
I have 2 questions regarding this timeout
notification:
1)When a timeout is detected and kamailio send the BYE is that
possible to manipulate the BYE before he is sent to add maybe an extra
header that indicate that the call was stopped due to a timeout issue ?
The attempts so far to get this done were by sending mi/rpc command to
dialog module, which can take a parameter with extra headers, see for
example:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/dialog.html#id2555056
2)If a user put the call on hold (with a=recvonly or
maybe old way
IP=0.0.0.0.0) what will happens (the music on hold is not generated by
rtpproxy but by another server) ? he will detect this as a timeout ?
Is that possible to indicate to rtpproxy that for a
moment stream will be only in one way ?
Personally I don't have the insights for these questions, maybe someone
else can answer. I expect there should be anyhow a timeout (maybe
higher) even for such case, not to get the endless call dead in on-hold
state.
Cheers,
Daniel
Best regards
Laurent
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda