4 Mar
2008
4 Mar
'08
12:33 a.m.
At 06:04 PM 3/3/2008, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
So what was the issues that were out-of-order .... was
it modules
that have not been migrated to the new DB-API yet, or even more?
Both of the above. The out of order was my cause and easily resolved.
The "not been migrated" . lcr was the important one. I just skipped it
for now and did something simple in the ser.cfg to simulate lcr.
Would you be willing/interested in looking at the OOB
and Ai1 deb packages
and testing those and/or porting those to RH? I think they now greatly
help to define a self-contained system, but they haven't really been
tested or fine-tuned.
I can do this.
For practice, I have taken several CVS snapshots for ser /
ser_ctl and have built them
on RH (CentOS/5, FC6, FC7). FC8 is next on my list. On the earlier
FC6 I had some
yum updates for tshark and tools. FC7 all seems ok. Expect FC8 to
also be OK.
I have not yet ventured into SERWEB or SEMS trying to stay focused on
learning the
basics. I look forward to those two as well.
For further practice, I have written and am testing a new module for
something that
interested me. Runs well. I may have a question for you regarding AVP and my
new module. Or shall I just toss the question to the serdev list?
Therefore, I feel comfortable enough to port from DEB to RH/FCx.
Do you have a CVS/svn repository for all the pieces?
..mike..
Thanks a lot!
-jiri