I suggest we focus on the technical board right now and pick up that ball a bit later. Note also that it's iptel.org contributors and not only SER contributors who are within the scope of nominations to the technical board. g-)
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
Shall not we have another narrowly focused group for resolving interop issues, ideally recruited on a wider basis than SER contributors?
-jiri
At 12:41 24/05/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)
-jiri
At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik Scholz.
Jan.
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and when people accept the nominations.
Let me start: I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across SER), N. (sip@arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider installations).
As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS representative/developer, I only nominate four. g-)
SIP wrote:
You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when deciding their votes. Just an idea.
I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating stuff! Seconded? ;)
N.
Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear rationale in order to prefer it. g-) ------- Original message ------- From: Martin Hoffmann hn@nvnc.de Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org, serdev@lists.iptel.org, semsdev@iptel.org Sent: 18.5.'07, 10:54
> Greger V. Teigre wrote: > > >> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote. My >> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and >> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building: >> posting to the list. >> >> > I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be > secret. > > Regards, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serdev mailing list Serdev@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
-- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/