Dear Sirs,
Our company is currently evaluating several freely available SIP
proxy/registrars to extend our VoIP billing engine, which currently
only supports H323, to support SIP as well. We found SER to be one of
the best for our needs: speed, documentation, flexibility - everything
is great. Hovewer, since our billing engine uses Radius for AAA, we need
to get Radius modules working. Unfortunately, we can't compile radius
modules with virgin radiusclient 0.3.2 as suggested in documentation - it
seems that some SIP-specific changes need to be applied to radiusclient
headers, see the following log:
gcc -fPIC -DPIC -pipe -O -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=pentium2 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -malign-double -falign-loops -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.8.10"' -DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"freebsd"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 3.2"' -D__CPU_i386 -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN -I/usr/local/include -c acc.c -o acc.o
acc.c: In function `radius_log_reply':
acc.c:125: `PW_SIP_METHOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:125: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
acc.c:125: for each function it appears in.)
acc.c:136: `PW_SIP_RESPONSE_CODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:156: `PW_SIP_FROM_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:189: `PW_SIP_TO_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:213: `PW_SIP_CSEQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:288: `PW_SIP_TRANSLATED_REQ_URI' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c: In function `radius_log_ack':
acc.c:434: `PW_SIP_METHOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:442: `PW_SIP_RESPONSE_CODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:461: `PW_SIP_FROM_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:491: `PW_SIP_TO_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:514: `PW_SIP_CSEQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:588: `PW_SIP_TRANSLATED_REQ_URI' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c: In function `rad_acc_request':
acc.c:733: `PW_SIP_METHOD' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:744: `PW_SIP_RESPONSE_CODE' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:764: `PW_SIP_FROM_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:797: `PW_SIP_TO_TAG' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:821: `PW_SIP_CSEQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
acc.c:904: `PW_SIP_TRANSLATED_REQ_URI' undeclared (first use in this function)
Would you be so kind to provide us with your changes for radiusclient or
point out where that modified version can be downloaded?
Thank you in advance!
On a separate note I would like to ask you to let me know if there is
any progress on pre-paid module discussed on this list recently. Since we
will also need this functionality, perhaps we can team-up to implement it.
Sincerely,
Maxim Sobolev
PortaOne Ltd
I really hate answering my own question :-)
> } else if(method=="BYE") {
> setflag(1);
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
I changed this to t_relay() and then I get the BYE
ACC output in the syslog file. This explains something else
(I think). Sometimes the BYE would work, sometimes it would
not make it all the way to the other device (either the PSTN gateway or the
UA). That is probably because forward() simply bounces the
packet via UDP and the UDP can fail ??? t_relay() retries??
Does this make sense?
---greg
>
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to create a basic script for routing calls to and from
>the PSTN. I have experimented with many scripts over the last month,
>this included script is an example. I can use a UA on my
>laptop called 'estara' and REGISTER with my ser sip server.
>I can make a phone call (INVITE) to the PSTN. I can hang up the call
>from either end (BYE) and everything seems to work well.
>
>I am trying to get accounting working. I see the call acceptance
>record in my syslog file:
>
>Jan 7 00:21:09 build ser[3507]: ACC: transaction answered: method=INVITE, i-uri=sip:92143357976@build.august.net, o-uri=sip:2143357976@64.90.42.16:5060, call_id= 847b3d22-131d-46b0-abcb-dc8e6a9f32b5(a)192.168.100.100, from= greg <sip:1107@build.august.net>;tag=3a7b9c52, code=200
>
>However, I can't get the 'BYE' event to record the transaction to the
>syslog file. The 'BYE' event is bouncing through my SIP server.
>Can someone give me a hint?
>
>Thank you,
>---greg
>Greg Fausak
>
>Included file----example.cfg----------------------------------------
>debug=1 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
>fork=yes
>log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
>check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
>dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
>rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
>port=5060
>children=4
>fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
>
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
>modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
>modparam("acc", "acc_flag", 1 )
>
>route{
> # filter too old messages
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> log("LOG: Too many hops\n");
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> break;
> };
> if (len_gt( max_len )) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Wow -- Message too large");
> break;
> };
>
> /* ********* RR ********************************** */
>
> /* Do strict routing if route headers present */
> rewriteFromRoute();
> /* record-route INVITEs -- all subsequent requests must visit us */
> if (method=="INVITE") {
> addRecordRoute();
> } else if (method=="REGISTER") {
> log("here is a register");
> save("location");
> break;
> };
>
> # now check if it really is a PSTN destination which should be handled
> # by our gateway; if not, and the request is an invitation, drop it --
> # we cannot terminate it in PSTN; relay non-INVITE requests -- it may
> # be for example BYEs sent by gateway to call originator
> if (!uri=~"sip:9[2-9][0-9]{9}@.*") {
> if (method=="INVITE") {
> sl_send_reply("403", "Call cannot be served here");
> } else if(method=="BYE") {
> setflag(1);
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> } else {
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> };
> break;
> };
>
> # account completed transactions via syslog
> setflag(1);
>
> strip(1);
>
>
> rewritehostport("64.90.42.16:5060");
>
> # forward the request now
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> break;
> };
>}
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
hi,
i have a problem about qm_malloc.
my ser has been running correctly before sevral days. but on the day before yesterday it doesn't work suddenly, in the debug mode, the output informations are:
..
0(1114) find_export: found <~db_insert> in module mysql [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so]
0(1114) find_export: found <~db_delete> in module mysql [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so]
0(1114) find_export: found <~db_update> in module mysql [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so]
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 24) called from dbase.c: db_init(266)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 24) returns address 0x80b43d0 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 30) called from dbase.c: connect_db(69)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 32) returns address 0x80b4418 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 544) called from dbase.c: connect_db(89)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 544) returns address 0x80b4468 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4418), called from dbase.c: connect_db(106)
0(1114) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from dbase.c: connect_db(69)
0(1114) mod_init(): Database connection opened successfuly
Maxfwd module- initializing
rr - initializing
0(1114) TM - initializing...
0(1114) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (t_uac) registered
0(1114) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (t_uac_from) registered
0(1114) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (t_hash) registered
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 1572864) called from h_table.c: init_hash_table(276)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 1572864) returns address 0x421354b8 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) DEBUG: lock_initialize: lock initialization started
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 16) called from lock.c: lock_initialize(169)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 16) returns address 0x422b54e8 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 448) called from timer.c: tm_init_timers(484)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 448) returns address 0x422b5528 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 40) called from t_stats.c: init_tm_stats(110)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 40) returns address 0x422b5718 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 12) called from t_stats.c: init_tm_stats(118)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 12) returns address 0x422b5770 on 0 -th hit
..
stateless - initializing
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 320) called from sl_stats.c: init_sl_stats(128)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 320) returns address 0x422b5824 on 0 -th hit
0(1114) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (sl_stats) registered
0(1114) DEBUG: MD5 calculated: d907c037823644515dfe0ede38ca9976
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 4) called from sl_funcs.c: sl_startup(65)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 4) returns address 0x422b5994 on 0 -th hit
mysql - initializing
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 396) called from main.c: main(1363)
0(1114) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 396) returns address 0x422b59c8 on 0 -th hit
0(0) fixing /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so mf_process_maxfwd_header
0(0) fixing /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so sl_send_reply
0(0) fixing /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so sl_send_reply
0(0) fixing /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so rewriteFromRoute
0(0) fixing /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so save
0(0) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 16) called from dlist.c: new_dlist(87)
0(0) qm_malloc(0x4212f000, 16) returns address 0x422b5b84 on 0 -th hit
...
0(0) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 96) called from db_row.c: convert_row(49)
0(0) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 96) returns address 0x80b47cc on 0 -th hit
0(0) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 96) called from db_row.c: convert_row(49)
0(0) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 96) returns address 0x80b485c on 0 -th hit
Segmentation fault
it seems that ser can't allocate memory by qm_malloc function. what's wrong with it?
i have tried to reinstall my linux8.0 OS, but the problem is still existed.
please help me!
thanks!
regards,Joe_chen
Hi,
I am trying to create a basic script for routing calls to and from
the PSTN. I have experimented with many scripts over the last month,
this included script is an example. I can use a UA on my
laptop called 'estara' and REGISTER with my ser sip server.
I can make a phone call (INVITE) to the PSTN. I can hang up the call
from either end (BYE) and everything seems to work well.
I am trying to get accounting working. I see the call acceptance
record in my syslog file:
Jan 7 00:21:09 build ser[3507]: ACC: transaction answered: method=INVITE, i-uri=sip:92143357976@build.august.net, o-uri=sip:2143357976@64.90.42.16:5060, call_id= 847b3d22-131d-46b0-abcb-dc8e6a9f32b5(a)192.168.100.100, from= greg <sip:1107@build.august.net>;tag=3a7b9c52, code=200
However, I can't get the 'BYE' event to record the transaction to the
syslog file. The 'BYE' event is bouncing through my SIP server.
Can someone give me a hint?
Thank you,
---greg
Greg Fausak
Included file----example.cfg----------------------------------------
debug=1 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
modparam("acc", "acc_flag", 1 )
route{
# filter too old messages
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
log("LOG: Too many hops\n");
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (len_gt( max_len )) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Wow -- Message too large");
break;
};
/* ********* RR ********************************** */
/* Do strict routing if route headers present */
rewriteFromRoute();
/* record-route INVITEs -- all subsequent requests must visit us */
if (method=="INVITE") {
addRecordRoute();
} else if (method=="REGISTER") {
log("here is a register");
save("location");
break;
};
# now check if it really is a PSTN destination which should be handled
# by our gateway; if not, and the request is an invitation, drop it --
# we cannot terminate it in PSTN; relay non-INVITE requests -- it may
# be for example BYEs sent by gateway to call originator
if (!uri=~"sip:9[2-9][0-9]{9}@.*") {
if (method=="INVITE") {
sl_send_reply("403", "Call cannot be served here");
} else if(method=="BYE") {
setflag(1);
forward(uri:host, uri:port);
} else {
forward(uri:host, uri:port);
};
break;
};
# account completed transactions via syslog
setflag(1);
strip(1);
rewritehostport("64.90.42.16:5060");
# forward the request now
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
}
Hi All,
I am newbie of this field, thanks everyone help me.
I am interesting in B2BUA, however, except some brief defination in 3261, I could not find any further defination or how to implement about B2BUA, I noticed that SER could be implemented as a B2BUA, where can I find some implementation? or where can I get any description?
Koalas
I just setup an account on iptel.org (joejoe(a)iptel.org)
and I connected it to it fine with Messenger which leads me to believe
that I have done something wrong with my ser installation.
thanks,
-joe
Hi,
I've got ser installed and running (0.8.10 on Linux 2.4.18-18.8.0) I
attempt to connect to it with MS "Windows Messenger" version
4.7.0104 on WindowsXP, but it never connected and I don't see
anything in the logfile showing even an attempt to connect.
Just to make sure that I didn't have any firewall rules blocking
access, I wrote a little script to connect to port 5060 on the sip
server and send it "Asdf\n", that appeared to work fine, as this
appeared in my log:
Jan 6 10:57:39 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14077]: ERROR: parse_first_line: message too short: 5
Jan 6 10:57:39 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14077]: ERROR:parse_first_line: bad message
Jan 6 10:57:39 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14077]: ERROR: parse_msg: message=<Asdf >
Jan 6 10:57:39 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14077]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed
So it appears that packets can get to the sip server fine from the
machine that runs the Messenger client.
I also ran serctl moni and didn't see any different output when I
tried to connect with Messenger, i.e. there is no indication that a
connection attempt is even made.
Is there another IM client I can try connecting with? Any other
tricks to know about Messenger other than what I found at:
http://www.iptel.org/ietf55/use_msn.html
BTW, this is using the mysql module and I created a user with serctl
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 ser: ser startup succeeded
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14068]: mod_init(): Database connection opened successfuly
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14068]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14068]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14068]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14068]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14080]: INFO: fifo process starting: 14080
Jan 6 10:53:50 dell1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[14080]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo...
thanks,
-joe
I'm seeing the following errors in syslog when I place a call to one
particular URI in my system. There are 5 devices registered to receive
calls for this URI. Is this a problem? Is there a limit to how many
telephone sets can have the same number appearance?
Jan 3 12:15:44 sip /usr/sbin/ser[9845]: lookup(): Error while appending a branch
Jan 3 12:15:44 sip /usr/sbin/ser[9845]: USRLOC DB lookup not found...
Jan 3 12:15:52 sip /usr/sbin/ser[9846]: ERROR: append_branch: max nr of branches
exceeded
1) use [serusers]
2) really do use [serusers]
3) I mean it really -- please, use [serusers] and not
[sip-implementors]
Thank you :-) ([sip-implementors] is for discussing of sip
developers' issues and is not related to any specific implementation)
--
As for your problem -- please, look first at your log files. It is
otherwise difficult to guess why ser does not start or stops.
See http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser-html/x156.html
for more guidelines on error reporting. We will be glad to review your
issue as soon as you submit more detailed information.
Thank you,
-Jiri
At 08:46 PM 1/4/2003, Erik Lagerway wrote:
>I have tried to connect with several SIP clients to our SER and this is
>the message sent to the server by the client, ngrep on the server shows
>the same message:
>
>U 206.12.30.135:1053 -> 65.39.143.170:5060
> REGISTER sip:xten.net SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>206.12.30.135:5060..From: s
> ip:xlags@xten.net..To: sip:xlags@xten.net..Contact:
>sip:xlags@206.12.30.135
> :5060..Call-ID:
>31f2da21-b0d8-41b4-a047-6058b9997f1f@206.12.30.135..CSeq: 4
> 56557 REGISTER..Content-Length: 0..Expires: 3600....
>
>When I run "serctl ps" it do not see any running processes. I get the
>same result when I use "ps -aux". It's like the server isn't running or
>something yet I am not getting an error, just black space.
>
>When I do /etc/rc.d/init.d/ser restart, I get this:
>
>[root@localhost /]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/ser restart
>Stopping ser: /etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17491) - No such
>process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17490) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17489) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17488) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17482) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17481) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17480) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17479) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17478) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (17477) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2533) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2516) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2515) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2514) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2513) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2511) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2510) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2509) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2508) - No such process
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/ser: line 201: kill: (2507) - No such process
> [ OK ]
>Starting ser: [ OK ]
>
>After restarting I have to add my SIP _DOMAIN again, then I get the same
>results as stated above.
>
>My SIP_DOMAIN is xten.net, my realm is the same. The SIP server address
>is ser.xten.net. Registered users: xlags(a)xten.net pwd: 484827,
>mark(a)xten.net pwd: 484827
>
>Could someone help me with this, I would really like to get this working
>:)
>
>erik(a)xten.com
>Msn id: elagerway(a)hotmail.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sip-implementors mailing list
>Sip-implementors(a)cs.columbia.edu
>http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi,
I just installed ser from cvs and when I ran it I got:
% /usr/local/sbin/ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser.cfg
ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
So I turned on debugging in the ser.cfg file and saw:
% /usr/local/sbin/ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser.cfg
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so
0(22488) loading module /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so
0(22488) find_param_export: found <db_mode> in module usrloc [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/\
usrloc.so]
0(22488) find_export: found <mf_process_maxfwd_header> in module maxfwd_module [/usr/loca\
l/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so]
0(22488) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/local/lib/ser/modul\
es/sl.so]
0(22488) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/local/lib/ser/modul\
es/sl.so]
0(22488) find_export: <rewriteFromRoute> not found
0(22488) parse error (80,19-20): unknown command, missing loadmodule?
[...]
So I commented out the rewriteFromRoute(); line and the server started
up fine.
Any ideas why it doesn't like that line?
This is on Linux 2.4.18-18.0
thanks,
-joe
