Hello,
I experienced some strange behaviour of my kphone (V3.11). When I click
on register the first time nothing happens (no error message, keeps
offline). Clicking the "register" button the second time makes kphone go
online.
With the help of Uli and Daniel (thanks !) I could record the network
traffic caused by both clicks. In the attached file the first two
messages were caused by the first (unsuccessful) click on "register".
The next two messages where caught after my second click on register
which succeeds. Comparing the two requests I saw the different entries
in the "Expires" field (fist 0, second 900) but to my surprise even the
call-IDs are the same.
Do you know what is going wrong here ?
BTW: Of course I don't mind to click on register twice in kphone. But
right now I have a problem receiving messages with MS Messenger (will
describe that separately if I cannot solve it myself) and I'm trying to
find out if the reason is within the SER on UA's side. Therefore I
cannot ignore anything that looks like an error (e.g. wrong config) in
SER or an UA while I'm testing different scenarios.
Thanks,
Alex
Hello,
I'm running an SER checked out from cvs with almost unchanged standard
config file based on [ser]/etc/ser.cfg (see attachment).
Sending a short plain text message from a MS Messenger on a Win XP
machine in the LAN to a kphone on the linux host running also the SER
works fine. And that even though the SDP part of the request claims
about an "invalid line" (btw.: you can watch the attached *.ngrep files
with ethereal).
Sending a message the other way around (from kphone to messenger) the
messenger replies with 400 Bad Request. I made sure that the messenger's
privacy settings allow any user to send messages to me. The same (reply:
400 Bad request) happens if I send a plain text message from one MS
Messenger to another on two different hosts in any direction.
Can you help my find out why I can't receive text messages with MS
Messenger ?
Thank you very much,
Alex
Starting using ser with the default ser.cfg on my linux system, I was able to successfully REGISTER a SIP UA to the ser proxy. 200 OK was answered by the proxy to the UA.
I did not install MySql and would like to look at InMeme DB Registration status.
serctl ul show returns the following and I can't get any info about my registered UA. Could you help me ?
===Domain list===
---Domain---
name : 'location'
size : 512
table: 0x402fb350
d_ll {
  n   : 0
  first: (nil)
  last : (nil)
}
lock : 0
__________________________________________________________________
McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network.
Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397
Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455
Hi,
This is the error message I get when I'm trying:
Warning: Access denied for user: 'admin@localhost' (Using password: YES)
in /var/www/phplib/db_mysql.inc on line 73
Database error: pconnect(localhost, admin, heslo) failed.
MySQL Error: ()
Session halted.
Any further idea?
-----Original Message-----
From: Karel Kozlik [mailto:kozlik@kufr.cz]
Sent: Tuesday, 03 June, 2003 14:50
To: George KAPELIOS
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Serweb admin remote access
Hello,
no in serweb isn't any restriction to IP range. Check your apache
configuration.
Karel
George KAPELIOS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have serweb up and running, but when I'm trying to
> access at the /admin/index.php from a remote host (on
> the same LAN where the ser & serweb are running), it's
> not possible.
>
> Does any one tell me if there is any restirction to
> localhost only and how shall I change it ?
>
> Thanks,
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
Hello,
I have serweb up and running, but when I'm trying to
access at the /admin/index.php from a remote host (on
the same LAN where the ser & serweb are running), it's
not possible.
Does any one tell me if there is any restirction to
localhost only and how shall I change it ?
Thanks,
George
Hi,
It would be very useful if we could assign a SIP address for voicemail redirect on an individual basis. For example if I call somebody and they are not registered, or the number is busy, then an entry in the subscriber table could point to the voicemail SIP address so the caller could at least leave a message. Does somebody else think this would be a good feature to have?
How are people handling Voicemail with SER today?
Thanks,
Ricardo Villa
As speaker and exhibitor at the event, iptel.org is glad to invite you to VoN London
(http://www.pulver.com/europe2003/). We will be presenting our application architecture
for integration of SIP telephony with legacy networks and Internet services.
In the exhibition, we are located in the booth #4 (nic.at) as a part of a world-wide
ENUM trial which leverages our SIP Express Router (SER) (http://www.iptel.org/ser/).
We will be demonstrating ENUM interoperability and our SIP applications based on the
latest SER version with numerous new features (media component, ENUM support, DDM,
presence agent, NAT traversal, web applications, etc.)
On the 9th, iptel.org founder, Jiri Kuthan, will be holding a SIP tutorial (9am-6pm).
On the 10th, he will participate in an "Open Source Voice" session (2:15-3:30pm) and
share our deployment experience with audience.
See you in London. If you need to arrange a time-slot with us, drop us an e-mail.
Andy Blen
Hi everyone,
What's happening to the function (In the latest CVS version of Ser)?:
int is_user_in(struct sip_msg* msg, char* hf, char* group);
When I use this function in the config file it returns an error.
Did it change is name?
Did it simply desapear?
What coud it be missing here?
Best Regards,
Toni
At 03:43 PM 5/13/2003, Andrzej Radke wrote:
>One question yet.
>What with aliases for separate domains ?
That depends...
If that is about numbers (the common case) you can designate a numbering
plan that can be shared accross the domains (prefix 1--domain 1, prefix 2 --
domain 2) -- then you will have only 1 alias table to maintain.
>Have to I add something to my configuration ?
>something like this: save("aliases") save("aliases1")
>for separate domian registration ?
Typically you do not modify aliases from SER scripts on receipt of a SIP
message -- you just look them up.
-Jiri
