- sr-users - kamailio.org

Kamailio hardware requirements
by Mickael Marrache 20 Mar '15

20 Mar '15

Hi, We are currently deploying an entire architecture composed of load balancers, proxies and media relays. All the components except the media relays are Kamailio instances. The media relays are RTP proxy instances. We are trying to determine the hardware requirements for the different servers. We will start with an architecture composed of: . 2 load balancers (one kept as backup to ensure availability) . 2 proxies (load is balanced over the 2 using the DISPATCHER module) . 2 media relays We are trying to determine the recommended hardware for the different components taking into account we will need to serve around 400000 users. How many registrations per second can Kamailio support? How many concurrent calls can Kamailio support? What is the recommended number of children processes? What is the recommended size for PKG memory? What is the recommended size for SHM memory? Thanks for your help, Mickael

2 1

auth_diameter module
by Grant Bagdasarian 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Hello, Does Kamailio still support authentication using the auth_diameter module? There is a note on the modules page stating the module is now obsolete. "NOTE: diameter support was developed for DISC (DIameter Server Client project at http://developer.berlios.de/projects/disc/). This project seems to be no longer maintained and DIAMETER specifications were updated in the meantime. Thus, the module is obsolete and needs rework to be usable with opendiameter or other DIAMETER servers." Is the page referring to this module or the DISC? Are there perhaps any other ways to do authentication with Kamailio using diameter?

2 1

RTPProxy issue?
by Igor Potjevlesch 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Hello, I discovered an issue related to the handling of "timestamp" and/or "Marker bit" with rtpproxy (I use the latest Extension 20081224). The call-flow is the following: one UA places a call to A and put this call on hold. Then, the same UA call another number B. Individual streams are ok. When the UA tries to transfer A with B, the RTPProxy receive a RTP packet with a huge timestamp and the Marker bit set to "True". Just after this RTP packet, RTPProxy stop forward the RTP packets from A to B. B to C is still working. Anyone have an idea? Regards, Igor.

3 9

Sending PUSH notification asynchronously
by Mickael Marrache 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Hi, I'm trying to add PUSH support to my system using Kamailio. When a call is received and the callee has no active registration, a PUSH is sent to the callee endpoint. In order to send this PUSH, my proxy sends an HTTP requests to another server that will send the PUSH. So, my route block is as follows: route[PUSH] { #Send PUSH notification using a custom module I wrote #Suspend transaction execution. t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); if(!t_suspend()) { send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); exit; } $sht(push=>join::$rU) = "" + $T(id_index) + ":" + $T(id_label); exit; } I would like to execute this route block asynchronously (i.e. in a separate process). I tried using the async_task_route command, and I can see the route block is execute in a separate process, however some stuffs are broken (e.g. transaction timeout, failure route). So, I thought it may be related to the fact asynchronous execution is implemented using t_suspend/t_continue and in this case, t_suspend/t_continue would be called twice. The important point is to make the interaction with the PUSH server asynchronous. Any idea? Thanks, Mickael

2 6

Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
by Mickael Marrache 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael

2 7

missing BYE when 2 redundant kamailio servers share the same database
by Ding Ma 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

This is the SIP log when using location routing for BYE from peer server.

1 0

missing BYE when 2 redundant kamailio servers share the same database
by Ding Ma 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

This is the SIP log with the 500 error for BYE.

1 0

SQLOPS bug
by Mihaly Zachar 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi Gents, Please consider applying this patch: --- ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c.orig 2015-03-18 16:33:56.994320505 +0100 +++ ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c 2015-03-18 16:34:11.254419341 +0100 @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ LM_ERR("row index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n", i, res->nrows); goto error; } - if(i>=res->ncols) + if(j>=res->ncols) { LM_ERR("column index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n", j, res->ncols); goto error; Regards, Misi

2 3

missing BYE when 2 redundant kamailio servers share the same database
by Ding Ma 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi, all I'm trying to set up 2 kamailio servers for active-active redundancy. The two kamailio severs share the the same database with db_mode=3, and no registration replication. Use pjsua2 as SIP client for testing. The test setup is as follows: kamailio server 1(k1): 10.0.1.30:5061 kamailio server 2(k2): 10.0.1.32:5061 sip client c1: sip:16317@10.0.1.30, client ip: 10.0.1.254 sip client c2: sip:72316@10.0.1.30, client ip: 10.0.1.254 c1 is registered with k1. c2 is registered with k2. When c1 calls c2, the call flow is as follows: INVITE: c1------>k1------>k2------>c2 200 OK: c1<------k1<------k2<------c2 So far, the INVITE works. c1 and c2 can establish a call. However, when c2 hangs up and sends BYE, the BYE is forwarded all the way to k1, and then k1 gives a 500 server error. The log on k1 seems to indicate k1 was attempting to create a TLS connection to itself instead of using the existing TLS connection to c1 to forward the BYE. BYE: c1 X k1<------k2<------c2 | |------->Connection refused/500 Here is the kamailio log on k1: Mar 16 10:34:21 kamailio.sip.com /usr/sbin/kamailio[13396]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 10.0.1.30:55999 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 16 10:34:21 kamailio.sip.com /usr/sbin/kamailio[13396]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 10.0.1.30:55999: connect & send for 0x7fc96a68a1a0 failed: Connection refused (111) This is the routing logic for BYE in kamailio.cfg: if (loose_route()) { route(DLGURI); if (is_method("BYE")) { xlog("L_DBG", "=====BYE $ru from $fu $si:$sp to $du=====\n"); dlg_manage(); setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) { # ACK is forwarded statelessy route(NATMANAGE); } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) { # Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per RFC 6665. record_route(); } route(RELAY); exit; } else {...... If I add location based routing for BYE from peer kamailio, then the BYE seems to be forwarded correctly: if (loose_route()) { route(DLGURI); if (is_method("BYE")) { xlog("L_DBG", "=====BYE $ru from $fu $si:$sp to $du=====\n"); dlg_manage(); setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails # If BYE coming from Kamailio peer, route BYE by location $var(peerlist)=$sel(cfg_get.trusted.peers); $var(i) = 0; while($var(i)<$(var(peerlist){param.count})) { xlog("L_DBG", "=====$(var(peerlist){param.count})=====$(var(peerlist){param.valueat,$var(i)})=====\n"); if(src_ip==$(var(peerlist){param.valueat,$var(i)})) { lookup("location"); xlog("L_DBG", "=====BYE from $fu $si:$sp to $du=====\n"); break; } $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) { # ACK is forwarded statelessy route(NATMANAGE); } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) { # Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per RFC 6665. record_route(); } route(RELAY); exit; } else {...... My first question is why k1 loose_route sends the BYE to itself instead of the client. Is this a bug? My next question is whether the above location routing for BYE from peer kamailio a good/safe approach. The SIP traces are enclosed. Thanks

1 0

Kamailio and Busy Lamp Fields (BLF)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hello, a bit of time ago I played with Kamailio and BLF, therefore I published kind of getting started configuration file for this feature. It is available at: - http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf The plan was to add more to the tutorial, some guidelines for configuring the phones, but the time didn't allow it so far. Keep an eye on it for some new content. Contributions are also welcome, send them to me or take the content and publish it with new additions on another place. Hopefully is going to be useful for some people out there. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

siremis login issue
by Boris Ivanov 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi Hope this is right place to post my question. I have installed siremis under FreeBSD 10 It went through well. DB created with /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create. Problem happen when I trying to login as admin. [{"target":"ERROR","content":" \n[2015-03-11 17:31:37 (GMT)] An exception occurred while executing this script: \nError message: #8192, Non-static method BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context<\/font> \nScript name and line number of error:\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php:268<\/font> \n function:<\/b> errorHandler ( 8192, \"Non-static method BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\", \"\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\", 268, Array(0) ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/sysheader.inc 117\n function:<\/b> userErrorHandler ( 8192, \"Non-static method BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\", \"\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\", 268, Array(0) ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php 268\n function:<\/b> setQuoteIdentifiers ( ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php 177\n function:<\/b> __construct ( Array(1) ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj.php 37\n function:<\/b> __construct ( Array(1) ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php 166\n function:<\/b> constructObject ( \"system.do.UserDO\" ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php 56\n function:<\/b> getObject ( \"system.do.UserDO\", 0 ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizSystem.php 252\n function:<\/b> getObject ( \"system.do.UserDO\" ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php 92\n function:<\/b> authDBUser ( \"admin\", \"admin\" ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php 66\n function:<\/b> authenticateUser ( \"admin\", \"admin\" ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/user\/form\/LoginForm.php 92\n function:<\/b> Login ( ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 310\n function:<\/b> invoke ( ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 110\n function:<\/b> dispatchRequest ( ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 32\n function:<\/b> include_once ( \"\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php\" ) @ \/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/bin\/controller.php 6<\/div>\n _____ Please ask system administrator for help...<\/div>\n"}] Anyone knows how to fix? Boris ____________________________________________________________ This message and any attachments contain confidential information and must not be disclosed to a third party without the prior written consent of setcom. If you have received it erroneously, please discard it and contact us by return. ____________________________________________________________

2 5

Redirect server for load balancing and HA
by Markus 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi list, I'm new here, also to Kamailio. My goal is to achieve the "standard solution": Kamailio for load balancing and high availability of several Asterisk servers. For starters, I've set it up with Kamailio+dispatcher+permissions acting as a proxy and it was working fine, but I'd like to try to keep it much more simple. For these reasons: 1) I'd like to maintain different peer settings in Asterisk (DTMF, codecs). 2) I don't want/need a database for Kamailio. I think it is mandatory for permissions module + IP auth. So, let's do Asterisk the authentication, it's already there. 3) Accounting. I'm using a software where it's really useful for accounting purposes if every peer/user has its own entry in Asterisk's sip.conf / in realtime table. Long story short, my config now looks like this and it seems to be working fine for me: request_route { route(DISPATCHER); } route[DISPATCHER] { if ( method=="REGISTER") { ds_select_domain("1","4"); sl_send_reply("300","Redirect"); exit; } if ( method=="INVITE" ) { ds_select_domain("1","4"); sl_send_reply("300","Redirect"); exit; } if ( method=="SUBSCRIBE" ) { ds_select_domain("1","4"); sl_send_reply("300","Redirect"); exit; } } My questions: 1) There are other approaches to the DTMF+codecs issue. Like this thread from 2013: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2013-January/076379.html - but I have dozens of changing PSTN peers, so authentication/accounting based on port would be cumbersome. Are there new/alternative ways? 2) I searched the archive and the Web but did not find many questions about a "I-don't-want-Kamailio-to-show-as-the-only-peer-to-Asterisk" solution. Therefore I'm wondering: Is everyone a) running such homogeneous setups that they can survive with the same codec + DTMF settings in Asterisk for all their peers + users? Or b) doing some rewriting magic within Kamailio to deal with it? Or c) I'm overlooking a simple solution. Which one is it? :) 3) And the biggest question: Everywhere I read basically "Redirect server for LB + HA is not recommended, better use proxy". Is this still true, and if so, what are the reasons? Because I should be worried that not all clients/gateways out there respect a SIP 300 Redirect? Other reasons? Thanks so much! :) Markus

4 8

msilo clarification
by mayamatakeshi 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hello, maybe this phrase in the msilo doc is misleading: *Every time when a user registers with Kamailio, the module is looking in database for offline messages intended for that user. All of them will be sent to contact address provided in REGISTER request.* http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/msilo.html The above seems to imply that msilo would send the call directly to the contact address. But this doesn't seem to be the case based on what is mentioned in several threads in the mailing list and in what I saw in the msilo.c code. If so, is there a reason to be a such? Would it be a problem to allow msilo m_dump to get the values of contact, received and path and use them when calling t_request? Regards, Takeshi.

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value
by Slava Bendersky 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, I want do clean up on routes from first SUBSCRIBE, that when traffic goes to public side of kamailio will be only public route and when traffic is internal the Record-Route will stay internal only. In SDP I see like this. I tired double routes set 0 in rr, but didn't clean enough. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.88.252:5062;received=client_pub_ipbranch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> On public side remote this Record-Route Record-Route: <sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5084;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> On private side remote this Record-Route From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:01:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value Hello, can you give an example of incoming header and how you want to be after modification? It is not clear for me what end result you want/expect. Cheers, Daniel On 14/03/15 06:41, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma. My log shows Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Inbound connection from <Client Public IP> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: ERROR: <script>: <null> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Route for removal: '<null>' route snippet. route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Route")) { xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Inbound connection from <$si>\n"); if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { if(is_ip_rfc1918($si)) { xlog( "$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])" ); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[-1]"); } else { xlog( "$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])" ); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } } return; } Slava, From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:00:44 PM Subject: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value Hello Everyone, I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG); route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) { if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog( "$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])" ); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } return; } Any help Thank you, Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

Dialogs not deleted on BYE
by Shane Harrison 18 Mar '15

18 Mar '15

Hi all, Have found a few threads on this before which have clarified my understanding a little but not yet presented me with a solution. I am using dialog_ng. dlg_manage() is deprecated and as per the documentation, I am simply setting a dialog flag early in the request_route. Kamctl dialog show does indeed show the dialogs are tracked, but they are not destroyed on the receipt of the BYE. Dialog ref count remains at 2 and in state=4 Log shows the following Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=16 , global msg id=15 , T on entrance=(nil) Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=5943, isACK=0 Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fc8d79af798, callback type 1, id 0 entered Mar 16 22:43:42 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15484]: DEBUG: dialog_ng [dlg_handlers.c:855]: dlg_new_dialog(): starting dlg_new_dialog and method is [BYE] Looks to me as if fails to find a dialog match and actually creates a new dialog..... Dialog_ng only has one matching mode - DID, others have been deprecated. I have captured the outgoing INVITE and there is no dialog_id parameter added to the record_route. Is that causing my matching problem? Record-Route: <sip:64.208.160.211;transport=tcp;lr=on;ftag=5419eecb;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:203.171.39.49:5061;transport=tls;lr=on> Cheers Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

2 10

PRACK not sent
by Dharm S 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

Hi All, I am using kamailio 3.1.5. I am trying to send the PRACK message but it sends back 404 Not Here. I am new to using this. I am adding details in the configuration file below: I guess route[WITHINDLG] ####### Defined Values ######### # *** Value defines - IDs used later in config #!ifdef WITH_MYSQL # - database URL - used to connect to database server by modules such # as: auth_db, acc, usrloc, a.s.o. #!define DBURL "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_MULTIDOMAIN # - the value for 'use_domain' parameters #!define MULTIDOMAIN 1 #!else #!define MULTIDOMAIN 0 #!endif # - flags # FLT_ - per transaction (message) flags # FLB_ - per branch flags #!define FLT_ACC 1 #!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2 #!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3 #!define FLT_NATS 5 #!define FLB_NATB 6 #!define FLB_NATSIPPING 7 ####### Global Parameters ######### #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG debug=4 log_stderror=yes #!else debug=2 log_stderror=no #!endif memdbg=5 memlog=5 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 fork=yes children=4 /* uncomment the next line to disable TCP (default on) */ #disable_tcp=yes /* uncomment the next line to disable the auto discovery of local aliases based on reverse DNS on IPs (default on) */ #auto_aliases=no /* add local domain aliases */ #alias="sip.mydomain.com" /* uncomment and configure the following line if you want Kamailio to bind on a specific interface/port/proto (default bind on all available) */ #listen=udp:10.0.0.10:5060 /* port to listen to * - can be specified more than once if needed to listen on many ports */ port=5060 #!ifdef WITH_TLS enable_tls=yes #!endif ####### Custom Parameters ######### # These parameters can be modified runtime via RPC interface # - see the documentation of 'cfg_rpc' module. # # Format: group.id = value 'desc' description # Access: $sel(cfg_get.group.id) or @cfg_get.group.id # #!ifdef WITH_PSTN # PSTN GW Routing # # - pstn.gw_ip: valid IP or hostname as string value, example: # pstn.gw_ip = "10.0.0.101" desc "My PSTN GW Address" # # - by default is empty to avoid misrouting pstn.gw_ip = "" desc "PSTN GW Address" #!endif ####### Modules Section ######## # set paths to location of modules #!ifdef LOCAL_TEST_RUN mpath="modules_k:modules" #!else mpath="/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_MYSQL loadmodule "db_mysql.so" #!endif loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" loadmodule "acc.so" #!ifdef WITH_AUTH loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH loadmodule "permissions.so" #!endif #!endif #!ifdef WITH_ALIASDB loadmodule "alias_db.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_MULTIDOMAIN loadmodule "domain.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_PRESENCE loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "presence_xml.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_NAT loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "rtpproxy.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS loadmodule "tls.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD loadmodule "htable.so" loadmodule "pike.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_XMLRPC loadmodule "xmlrpc.so" #!endif # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # ----- mi_fifo params ----- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") # ----- tm params ----- # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) # default retransmission timeout: 30sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) # default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 120sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 120000) # ----- rr params ----- # add value to ;lr param to cope with most of the UAs modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # do not append from tag to the RR (no need for this script) modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 0) # ----- registrar params ----- modparam("registrar", "method_filtering", 1) /* uncomment the next line to disable parallel forking via location */ # modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) /* uncomment the next line not to allow more than 10 contacts per AOR */ #modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 10) # ----- acc params ----- /* what special events should be accounted ? */ modparam("acc", "early_media", 0) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 0) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 0) /* by default ww do not adjust the direct of the sequential requests. if you enable this parameter, be sure the enable "append_fromtag" in "rr" module */ modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 0) /* account triggers (flags) */ modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACCFAILED) /* enhanced DB accounting */ #!ifdef WITH_ACCDB modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("acc", "db_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") #!endif # ----- usrloc params ----- /* enable DB persistency for location entries */ #!ifdef WITH_USRLOCDB modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) #!endif # ----- auth_db params ----- #!ifdef WITH_AUTH modparam("auth_db", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "") modparam("auth_db", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) # ----- permissions params ----- #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH modparam("permissions", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("permissions", "db_mode", 1) #!endif #!endif # ----- alias_db params ----- #!ifdef WITH_ALIASDB modparam("alias_db", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("alias_db", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) #!endif # ----- domain params ----- #!ifdef WITH_MULTIDOMAIN modparam("domain", "db_url", DBURL) # use caching modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1) # register callback to match myself condition with domains list modparam("domain", "register_myself", 1) #!endif #!ifdef WITH_PRESENCE # ----- presence params ----- modparam("presence", "db_url", DBURL) # ----- presence_xml params ----- modparam("presence_xml", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("presence_xml", "force_active", 1) #!endif #!ifdef WITH_NAT # ----- rtpproxy params ----- modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:127.0.0.1:7722") # ----- nathelper params ----- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", FLB_NATSIPPING) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@kamailio.org") # params needed for NAT traversal in other modules modparam("nathelper|registrar", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)") modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", FLB_NATB) #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "config", "/etc/kamailio/tls.cfg") #!endif #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD # ----- pike params ----- modparam("pike", "sampling_time_unit", 2) modparam("pike", "reqs_density_per_unit", 16) modparam("pike", "remove_latency", 4) # ----- htable params ----- # ip ban htable with autoexpire after 5 minutes modparam("htable", "htable", "ipban=>size=8;autoexpire=300;") #!endif #!ifdef WITH_XMLRPC # ----- xmlrpc params ----- modparam("xmlrpc", "route", "XMLRPC"); modparam("xmlrpc", "url_match", "^/RPC") #!endif ####### Routing Logic ######## # Main SIP request routing logic # - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # NAT detection route(NAT); # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); ### only initial requests (no To tag) # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) t_relay(); exit; } t_check_trans(); # authentication route(AUTH); # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route(); # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } # dispatch requests to foreign domains route(SIPOUT); ### requests for my local domains # handle presence related requests route(PRESENCE); # handle registrations route(REGISTRAR); if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } # dispatch destinations to PSTN route(PSTN); # user location service route(LOCATION); route(RELAY); } route[RELAY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } if (isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { route(RTPPROXY); } #!endif /* example how to enable some additional event routes */ if (is_method("INVITE")) { #t_on_branch("BRANCH_ONE"); t_on_reply("REPLY_ONE"); t_on_failure("FAIL_ONE"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Per SIP request initial checks route[REQINIT] { #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD # flood dection from same IP and traffic ban for a while # be sure you exclude checking trusted peers, such as pstn gateways # - local host excluded (e.g., loop to self) if(src_ip!=myself) { if($sht(ipban=>$si)!=$null) { # ip is already blocked xdbg("request from blocked IP - $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); exit; } if (!pike_check_req()) { xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: pike blocking $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); $sht(ipban=>$si) = 1; exit; } } #!endif if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(RELAY); } else { if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(PRESENCE); exit; } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be an ACK after a 487 # or e.g. 404 from upstream server t_relay(); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging ## setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } if (!save("location")) sl_reply_error(); exit; } } # USER location service route[LOCATION] { #!ifdef WITH_ALIASDB # search in DB-based aliases alias_db_lookup("dbaliases"); #!endif if (!lookup("location")) { switch ($rc) { case -1: case -3: t_newtran(); t_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: sl_send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); } } # Presence server route route[PRESENCE] { if(!is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) return; #!ifdef WITH_PRESENCE if (!t_newtran()) { sl_reply_error(); exit; }; if(is_method("PUBLISH")) { handle_publish(); t_release(); } else if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { handle_subscribe(); t_release(); } exit; #!endif # if presence enabled, this part will not be executed if (is_method("PUBLISH") || $rU==$null) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not here"); exit; } return; } # Authentication route route[AUTH] { #!ifdef WITH_AUTH if (is_method("REGISTER")) { # authenticate the REGISTER requests (uncomment to enable auth) if (!www_authorize("$td", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("$td", "0"); exit; } if ($au!=$tU) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } } else { #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH if(allow_source_address()) { # source IP allowed return; } #!endif # authenticate if from local subscriber if (from_uri==myself) { if (!proxy_authorize("$fd", "subscriber")) { proxy_challenge("$fd", "0"); exit; } if (is_method("PUBLISH")) { if ($au!=$tU) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } } else { if ($au!=$fU) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } } consume_credentials(); # caller authenticated } else { # caller is not local subscriber, then check if it calls # a local destination, otherwise deny, not an open relay here if (!uri==myself) { sl_send_reply("403","Not relaying"); exit; } } } #!endif return; } # Caller NAT detection route route[NAT] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT force_rport(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (method=="REGISTER") { fix_nated_register(); } else { fix_nated_contact(); } setflag(FLT_NATS); } #!endif return; } # RTPProxy control route[RTPPROXY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (is_method("BYE")) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } else if (is_method("INVITE")){ force_rtp_proxy(); } if (!has_totag()) add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); #!endif return; } # Routing to foreign domains route[SIPOUT] { if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(RELAY); } } }

2 1

xlog from 1.5 to 4.2
by Juan Perez 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

I installed 4.2 and I am using the same config file form my current version 1.5.2, but none of my custom logs (xlog) are being printed in the log file, even after rising the debug level, the only messages I see are DEBUG these are my settings: loadmodule "xlog.so" # ----- xlog parms ------ modparam("xlog", "buf_size", 4096) Sample uses:xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Main logic started.\n"); xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Switchover Activated!\n"); xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Redundancy test, last 11 digits [$var(number)].\n"); xlog("L_INFO","mylog: Too Many Hops.\n"); am I missing something ?

2 1

PKG and Shared Memory statistics
by Dirk Teurlings Signet B.V. 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

Hi, We'd like to be able to get statistics of the used amount of memory in Kamailio. # kamctl stats shmem The above command only tells us what the shared memory is doing. Is there any way to get the committed size of memory for each of the PKG_MEMORY pools? If not, could this be added at some point? Kind regards, -- Dirk Teurlings

3 3

Deleted Domain
by Eric Fetty 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

Hi, I accidently deleted my domain from iptel.org. I went to re-create my account and it will not let me. Domain: kingfetty.com

2 1

478/sl and 478/sm on BYE?
by Don Fanning 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

I am getting these both when one end of the client sends a BYE - after the other client has already sent a BYE and got a 200 back. Config: http://pastebin.com/5gcFpJ3m /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3259]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {1070} /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3259]: INFO: <script>: sip:1070@df7jal23ls0d.invalid /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3259]: ERROR: <core> [resolve.c:1726]: sip_hostport2su(): could not resolve hostname: "df7jal23ls0d.invalid" /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3259]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:531]: forward_request(): bad host name df7jal23ls0d.invalid, dropping packet /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3259]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unresolvable destination (478/SL)

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] [RTPproxy] Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Announcing rtpproxy v2.0.0
by Maxim Sobolev 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

Do you have any particular RFC in mind? On Mar 12, 2015 10:28 AM, "John Mathew" <john.mathew(a)divoxmedia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Maxim, > Is there any plans for rtp header compression in future. I can't see > anything in the change log for 2.0.0 > > On Tuesday, 10 March 2015, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax(a)sippysoft.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm happy to announce that we have released rtpproxy v2.0.0. >> >> You can review the release notes here: >> https://github.com/sippy/rtpproxy/releases/tag/v2.0.0 >> >> -sobomax >> >> > > -- > Sent from iPhone 6 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rtpproxy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rtpproxy+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rtpproxy(a)googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rtpproxy/CA%2BSkwpUhu9fpwmqpRFiaXsQo9_%2B… > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rtpproxy/CA%2BSkwpUhu9fpwmqpRFiaXsQo9_%2B…> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >

2 1

Kamailio IMS: can not register
by dfretes＠ing.una.py 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi all. I'm trying to setup Kamailio for IMS server, but I've reached a point where I can not move. Trying to register from the Boghe client, I get these errors from the pcscf: tail -f /var/log/syslog|grep './pcscf' Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=402 a=25 n=xlog Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: <script>: REGISTER (sip:alice@ open-ims.test (192.168.1.105:62044) to sip:alice@open-ims.test, 20236156-7eed-01 e4-daac-5072e67f99e9) Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=414 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=594 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=576 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=584 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=590 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=584 a=24 n=pike_check_req Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=606 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=611 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=606 a=25 n=mf_process_maxfwd_heade r Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=617 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=611 a=26 n=sanity_check Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=623 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=617 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=629 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=623 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=633 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=629 a=24 n=t_lookup_request Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=636 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=633 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE QINIT] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=634 a=26 n=send_reply Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=417 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=673 a=55 n=force_rport Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=694 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=675 a=25 n=nat_uac_test Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=679 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=676 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=679 a=39 n=setflag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=687 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=680 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=681 a=24 n=set_contact_alias Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=683 a=26 n=xlog Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=684 a=24 n=nat_keepalive Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[NA T] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=694 a=2 n=return Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=424 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=420 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=458 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=424 a=24 n=has_totag Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=465 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=458 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=465 a=24 n=t_check_trans Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=472 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=467 a=25 n=is_method Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DE FAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=468 a=5 n=route Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=812 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=810 a=25 n=is_present_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=811 a=25 n=pcscf_save_pending Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=812 a=25 n=t_on_reply Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=813 a=25 n=t_on_failure Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=861 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=856 a=25 n=is_present_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=860 a=25 n=append_hf Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=872 a=24 n=t_relay Jan 29 22:36:29 kamailioast ./pcscf[3841]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RE GISTER] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=873 a=2 n=exit Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=910 a=16 n=if Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=908 a=25 n=t_check_status Jan 29 22:36:39 kamailioast ./pcscf[3845]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[RE GISTER_failure] c=[/etc/kamailio/pcscf/kamailio.cfg] l=909 a=26 n=send_reply All the time, this messages from the scscf: tail -f /var/log/syslog|grep './scscf' Jan 29 23:50:55 kamailioast ./scscf[3874]: INFO: cdp [peermanager.c:278]: peer_timer(): peer_timer(): Peer hss.open-ims.test #011State 6 Jan 29 23:50:55 kamailioast ./scscf[3874]: WARNING: cdp [peermanager.c:313]: peer_timer(): Inactivity on peer [hss.open-ims.test], sending DWR... - if we don't get a reply, the peer will be closed and nothing from the icscf. Thank you very much for any advice, I've run out of ideas.

2 4

seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it. As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch. I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3. Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.

3 8

Interoperability issues with older SIP clients
by Magnus Nordström 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi, We got interoperability issues with older SIP-clients. When e.g. some parameters are included in the SIP header Record-Route the call does not get connected. Now we are looking for a solution for that. We are using kamailio as SIP-registrar/proxy and would like to know if we can keep the call state and rewrite headers that causes interoperability issues. We are aware that kamailio is not a B2BUA. The basic idea would be e.g.: 1. kamailio proxy identifies a call from a modern SIP-client to an old SIP-client 2. kamailio send the call to a interoperability module (?) 3. the interoperabilty module removes sip-headers known to cause issues and saves them. 4. the interoperabilty module makes sure it is in the SIP signaling path 5. the interoperabilty module send the call forward to the old SIP-client 6. the interoperabilty module stays in path rewriting the SIP-headers. The modern SIP-client receives the SIP-signaling as if it was not rewritten. Do you think this is possible with kamailio? Thankful for any hints or ideas. Magnus Nordström

2 1

does ipops module dns_int_match_ip(hostname, ipaddr) search all returned records?
by canuck15 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

I am reading the documentation for the ipops module dns_int_match_ip() function and it states the following: "Returns TRUE if ipaddr is associated by DNS to hostname. FALSE otherwise. It uses internal DNS resolver. At this moment, the function might not check all the IP addresses as returned by dns_sys_match_ip(), because the internal resolver targets to discover the first address to be used for relaying SIP traffic. Thus is better to use dns_sys_match_ip() if the host you want to check has many IP addresses, in different address famililies (IPv4/6)." I am not sure what that statement means. I will be using this for IP authentication where the records it is checking against are in a mysql database and may or may not be be using the DNS name instead of the IP. Many of those DNS names could return several IP addresses and the incoming call could be on any one of those IP addresses. So when I do a check of a hostname against an IP address I want all returned A or srv IP's to be checked against the IP. Not just the first IP returned when checked. I do not believe dns_sys_match() will be fast enough on a busy server so I would prefer to using dns_int_match_ip(). If anyone can clarify what that statement means regarding "internal resolver targets to discover the first address" and whether that would affect my use it would be greatly appreciated. On a related note, is there any way to check the contents of the dns resolver cache? I looked through kamctl and kamcmd but didn't find anything. I tried "kamctl address show" but that didn't return anything.

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value
by Slava Bendersky 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma. My log shows Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Inbound connection from <Client Public IP> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: ERROR: <script>: <null> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Route for removal: '<null>' route snippet. route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Route")) { xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Inbound connection from <$si>\n"); if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { if(is_ip_rfc1918($si)) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[-1]"); } else { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } } return; } Slava, From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:00:44 PM Subject: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value Hello Everyone, I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG); route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) { if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } return; } Any help Thank you, Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

What does it mean when auth_check and auth_challenge flags are "0"?
by canuck15 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

I am trying to decipher a kamailio.cfg file for a particular open source project. There are problems with authentication and I am trying to understand why. They use the following lines for authentication check if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "0")) { auth_challenge("$fd", "0"); exit; The documentation only talks about using "1" and not "0". So I am trying to understand what the above statement with "0" is actually doing. Any help in this regard would be greatly appreciated.

2 1

Kamailio Freeswitch TCP call origination
by Niraj Roy 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi, Here is the setup I have configured. --Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer -- Three freeswitch works as the media server. -- They follow common MySQL database. Regular call flow User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B. Everything works fine as long as all users are registered and making call with single Kamailio. Now the problem starts when we distribute users on more than one kamailio. Let us take the case. UserA -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K1) UserB -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K2) Now User A initiates a call.. It will follow the same path User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B. Since User B is registered with K2. K1 being a public server won't be able to initiate any call to User B because there is no TCP connection established with it. Can anybody shade some light on this? Thanks,

3 2

how can I use WITH_IPAUTH when the IP may be stored in the DB as a FQDN?
by canuck15 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Here is is the relevant section of kamailio.cfg $var(tempfU) = $fU; #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH if((!is_method("REGISTER")) && allow_source_address() && $au == "") { # Loading $fU from database using IP sql_pvquery("elxpbx", "SELECT name FROM sip WHERE host = '$si' AND sippasswd IS NULL", "$var(tempfU)"); # source IP allowed return; } The problem is that when host= somefqdn.com the above will fail since $si will always be an IP address as far as I can tell. More often than not host= is a fqdn and requiring it to always be an IP address is not an option. Converting it to IP before storing it in the DB is also not an option because it needs to be able to work of the IP address changes. So how can the above be done to accomodate the possibility that host= somefqdn.com or an IP address. Preferably in such a way that it can scale to hundreds/thousands of rows in the database without slowing things down or crashing.

3 4

Help with 407 Proxy Auth. Required
by Agiftel 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Hi all, i cannot understand where is the problem with this transaction: Kamailio ask for Proxy authorization and in the second INVITE credentials are present. Can you help me understand? Regards U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.191831 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 INVITE sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, PRACK, NOTIFY, UPDATE. Supported: 100rel,from-change,timer,histinfo. User-Agent: OXO_GW_820/092.001. Session-Expires: 43200. P-Asserted-Identity: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>. History-Info: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;index=1. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Contact: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@10.160.21.51;transport=UDP;user=phone>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945190 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28. Max-Forwards: 70. Content-Length: 208. . v=0. o=default 1425909984 1425909984 IN IP4 10.160.21.51. s=-. c=IN IP4 10.160.21.51. t=0 0. m=audio 32000 RTP/AVP 18 106 4 8 0. a=sendrecv. a=rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:106 0-15. a=maxptime:90. U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.193299 10.160.20.18:5060 -> 10.160.21.51:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.aa4d. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945190 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28;received=10.160.21.51. Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="oxo.longwave.labo", nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/". Server: lw-sipproxysrv. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.195800 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 ACK sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.aa4d. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28. CSeq: 178945190 ACK. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.199176 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 INVITE sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="oxo",realm="oxo.longwave.labo",nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/",uri="sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone",response="263ed33da80fb520af0fb0b2f246d310". Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, PRACK, NOTIFY, UPDATE. Supported: 100rel,from-change,timer,histinfo. User-Agent: OXO_GW_820/092.001. Session-Expires: 43200. P-Asserted-Identity: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>. History-Info: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;index=1. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Contact: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@10.160.21.51;transport=UDP;user=phone>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945191 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 70. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842. Content-Length: 208. . v=0. o=default 1425909984 1425909984 IN IP4 10.160.21.51. s=-. c=IN IP4 10.160.21.51. t=0 0. m=audio 32000 RTP/AVP 18 106 4 8 0. a=sendrecv. a=rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:106 0-15. a=maxptime:90. U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.200387 10.160.20.18:5060 -> 10.160.21.51:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d413. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945191 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842;received=10.160.21.51. Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="oxo.longwave.labo", nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/". Server: lw-sipproxysrv. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.203016 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 ACK sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d413. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842. CSeq: 178945191 ACK. Content-Length: 0. . -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Help-with-407-Proxy-Auth-Required-t… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 4

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Where possible find updated version of options for textops. [sr_module.c:701]: find_mod_export_record(): find_export_record: <remove_hf_value> not found Specially Record-Route manipulation. Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE. http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, can you get the sip traffic from the network (from the first subscribe of this presence dialog)? It will help to see the Route set. Cheers, Daniel On 12/03/15 00:36, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

remove_hf_value
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG); route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) { if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } return; } Any help Thank you, Slava.

1 0

using xHTTP module, bind port?
by SamyGo 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hi All, I am just trying xhttp_rpc module http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/xhttp_rpc.html Where can I set/change the port for this module ? currently its only 5060 !? Thanks, Sammy.

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Alex Balashov 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

I am also not at all an expert in GPL licencing or IP, but would like to add that any customisation you make specifically for the purpose of interacting with a billing server or other external application is likely to take the form of a Kamailio module, rather than modifications to the existing Kamailio modules, the Kamailio core, or any other part of the stock code tree. As far as I know, under the GPL--broadly speaking, for I certainly don't know or remember the specifics--modules get different treatment than modifications per se. As far sa I know, if you can stick your code into [a] completely self-contained module(s) (and given what you've said about what specifically you want to accomplish, it seems to me that you absolutely can) that interact(s) with Kamailio using its module APIs and requires no modifications to Kamailio itself, it's not subject to the same licence constraints as modifications per se. Please do not take my advice as stated, and consult a competent software/IP attorney. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

3 5

How to install kamailio-4.2.3 in debian Wheezy
by Yanko Marín Muro 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello: How to install kamailio-4.2.3 in debian Wheezy? I need the procedure!!!! we can install P-CSCF, I-CSCF, S-CSCF and HSS on separate servers? Best regards, YANKO MARIN MURO --- This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gateway 5.6.28/RELEASE running at host imx3.etecsa.cu Visit our web-site: <http://www.kaspersky.com>, <http://www.viruslist.com>

3 2

Loadmodule mi_xmlrpc.so gives error
by SamyGo 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hi All, Im trying to load up module 'mi_xmlrpc.so' into my v4.2.1 Kamailio. It compiles nicely but when I try to load the module in config and restart kamailio it gives following error(s) 0(30917) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:597]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so>: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so: undefined symbol: xmlrpc_strsol 0(30917) : <core> [cfg.y:3436]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 329, column 12-25: failed to load module 0(30917) ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:166]: set_mod_param_regex(): No module matching <mi_xmlrpc> found Now, I've done some searching around and it seems like pre-req library version mismatch thing.. Do you guys have any solution to this. My end objective is to be able to send MI commands to my Kamailio server(s) via web-Interface. Any recommendations, examples are welcome. Best Regards, Sammy.

2 1

Kamailio and rtpengine Load Testing
by Marc Soda 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

I'm wondering if anyone has any experience load testing with Kamailio and rtpengine using WebRTC. I've had success load testing just Kamailio with sipp, but now I'd like to add the media piece and, if possible, do it via WebRTC. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks, Marc

3 2

Continent Code GeoIP module, kamailio 4.2
by Rene Montilva 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

Hi list i'm trying to configure rtp engine routing by source ip, i'd like divide it by continent code, is there any pseudo-variables or possibilites to handle continent code. Team, any idea about it?

3 11

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Daniel Tryba 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: > We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the > first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using > kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization > (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary > applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided > to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to > our customised code? You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourceP… "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization. But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL." So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your endusers (a service or a (complete) software product).

4 3

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Shankar 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

Hi, Thank you very much for the clarification. Our intention is to provide VOIP service and hence we need not expose our customized code to end users. Regards, Shankar --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:56:02 +0100 From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL Message-ID: <DD23FDE1-C5DA-4D98-B20E-DE7173C4902F(a)edvina.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 11 Mar 2015, at 10:13, Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: >> We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the >> first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using >> kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization >> (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary >> applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided >> to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to >> our customised code? > > You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But > gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePo stedPublic > > "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free > to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. > This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can > make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it > outside the organization. > > But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL > requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's > users, under the GPL." > > So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source > (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your > endusers (a service or a (complete) software product). > There is a big difference between GPLv2 and GPLv3 here. For GPL2, providing services is not seen as distribution of the source, and the commercial code can stay in the company. For GPLv3 it's different as far as I understand. Kamailio is GPLv2 and Siremis - the web interface by Asipto - is GPLv3. /O

1 0

Parser error with sql_pvquery?
by Anthony Messina 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

I'm trying to do an sql_pvquery() and have PostgreSQL return the default value using COALESCE (if the other parts of the query return NULL) rather than placing the $null check on the return in the Kamailio script. I seem to be coming up on a parser issue, perhaps too many nested parentheses: sql_pvquery("kamailio", "SELECT COALESCE((SELECT value FROM usr_preferences WHERE attribute='callee_rtp_transport' AND (uuid='$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_ip)' OR username='$rU') LIMIT 1), 'RTP/AVP')", "$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_rtp_transport)"); <core> [cfg.y:3428]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1444, column 14: syntax error Is this query "too complex" for the parser, or is there something I've missed above? Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

SIREMIS error
by Agiftel 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hi, i tried to install SIREMIS v 4.2 and i get error, already posted on internet/forum, regarding versione of PHP 5.6 What i didn't find is a solution. So my question is, I still unsupported by SIREMIS php v 5.4 and upper? Is there a solution?' Regards -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIREMIS-error-tp135884.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

OT: results investigating why kamailio.org was not responding recently
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello, as some noticed and informed privately or on mailing list, several days ago kamailio.org was not accessible. It was caused by apache getting stuck on connecting to a remote host due to the pingback feature of wordpress. All the other services were fine. Listing running processes showed a large number of apache instances connecting to an address like 23.x.y.204 and being stuck in that state. Fetching the page from that address with wget resulted in some html with embedded obfuscated javascript. I couldn't find a reason why apache was not closing the connection, although there are some timeouts in configs. Also, as I expect apache/php/wordpress don't run javascript, the issue should be somewhere at the http layer. At some point apache reached the max number of threads and didn't serve other requests. The solution was to disable the pingbacks using a plugin for wordpress named: Disable XML-RPC Pingback . All seems ok for the last days. I posted here just in case it will be useful for someone else, but also to get hints on other tweaks that we should to do wordpress to prevent similar situation, if anyone can share from his/her experience. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Calling ims charging function in route_failure
by Shane Harrison 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hi all, What I want to do ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If a call to a SIP AoR fails then try the PSTN number associated with the AoR by routing the request to a PSTN gateway. Calls to a PSTN gateway need to be charged so need to call the Ro_CCR function in ims_charging module. How I tried to do it ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] block I call the Ro_CCR() Result was ~~~~~~~~ Kamailio fails to parse config file. yyparse(): misused command Ro_CCR yyerror_at(): parse error in config file //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1162, column 91: Command cannot be used in the block So two questions: 1) What constraints are there for calling functions in the failure_route blocks i.e. how does parser decide what can be called and what can't 2) Any thoughts of how I can do effectively a late charging decision Cheers and thanks in advance Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

1 1

ims_charging module
by Shane Harrison 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi all ims'ers I have modified the ims_charging module to cope with the CCA return code of "CREDIT CONTROL NOT APPLICABLE". This means the call is not a chargeable call and the charging module now returns a unique return code for this. Currently there are two scenarios handled: 1) CCA grants the credit required for the call --> route the INVITE and then automatically new CCR requests are made for further credit as the call progresses 2) CCA doesn't grant the credit ---> send an error response back to INVITE originator - I assume this will clear all dialogs and no further credit requests are made. The question I have, is how do I cope with this unique return code so that I can continue to route the call but not make any more CCR requests to the credit control server? As I am not sure how the ims_charging module continues to generate CCR requests, it is difficult for me to understand how to essentially clear the whole CCR session without clearing the call. Kind regards Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

1 0

kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava.

2 1

Sipcapture module insert error
by Spencer Thomason 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I’m not sure if this is the correct forum for this question but here goes… I’m facing an issue setting up a sipcapture server. I’m seeing several db errors in the logs: Mar 6 10:45:13 sipcapture /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[37872]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Data too long for column 'correlation_id' at row 1 I did a packet capture of the sql query and it appears that the value for the correlation_id is omitted. Interestingly its not all packets but maybe 60%. Do I have something misconfigured? Thanks, Spencer A sanitized version of the query is below: insert into sip_capture (date,micro_ts,method,reply_reason,ruri,ruri_user,from_user,from_tag,to_user,to_tag,pid_user,contact_user,auth_user,callid,callid_aleg,via_1,via_1_branch,cseq,reason,content_type,auth,user_agent,source_ip,source_port,destination_ip,destination_port,contact_ip,contact_port,originator_ip,originator_port,proto,family,rtp_stat,type,node,correlation_id,msg ) values ('2015-03-06 10:50:22',1425667824109829,'180','Ringing','','','+12052222222','gK007b315d','+12051111111','3Sr0m4vyjy2UK','','+12051111111','','2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1','','SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7','z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7','1888238783 INVITE','','','','','3.3.3.3',5060,'1.1.1.1',5060,'2.2.2.2',6038,'',0,1,2,'',2,'node1:2001','SIP/2.0 180 Ringing\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:3.3.3.3;lr;ftag=gK007b315d>\r\nFrom: <sip:+12052222222@1.1.1.1>;tag=gK007b315d\r\nTo: <sip:+12051111111@3.3.3.3>;tag=3Sr0m4vyjy2UK\r\nCall-ID: 2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1\r\nCSeq: 1888238783 INVITE\r\nContact: <sip:+12051111111@2.2.2.2:6038;transport=udp>\r\nAccept: application/sdp\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n','SIP/2.0 180 Ringing\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:3.3.3.3;lr;ftag=gK007b315d>\r\nFrom: <sip:+12052222222@1.1.1.1>;tag=gK007b315d\r\nTo: <sip:+12051111111@3.3.3.3>;tag=3Sr0m4vyjy2UK\r\nCall-ID: 2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1\r\nCSeq: 1888238783 INVITE\r\nContact: <sip:+12051111111@2.2.2.2:6038;transport=udp>\r\nAccept: application/sdp\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n')

2 2

building kamailio with MongoDB
by Tom Braarup Cuykens 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

I am trying to setup a Kamailio with MongoDB but the complilation fails: make include_modules="db_mongodb rtpproxy" cfg make all [...] In file included from mongodb_connection.c:24:0: mongodb_connection.h:26:20: fatal error: mongoc.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [mongodb_connection.o] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 1 I have build the mongodb C driver from https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-c-driver/ Not sure if the issue is related to the Kamailio MongoDB module or the Mongo C driver. -- Med venlig hilsen Tom Braarup Cuykens plusTEL.dk

2 1

kamailio 4.2.3 Segmentation fault when using db_cluster module
by Jan Hazenberg 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I have a issue on kamailio 4.2.3 when using the db_cluster module. I have the following config: #!define DBURL "cluster://cls1" # ----- db_cluster params ----- modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con1=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.120/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con2=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.121/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con3=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.122/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "cluster", "cls1=>con1=9r8r;con2=9r8r;con3=9r8r") modparam("db_cluster", "inactive_interval", 180) modparam("db_cluster", "max_query_length", 5) # ----- sqlops params ----- modparam("sqlops","sqlcon","ca=>cluster://cls1") When i start kamailio it fails with: Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.allow Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:608]: mod_init(): default allow file (/usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.allow) not found => empty rule set Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.deny Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:617]: mod_init(): default deny file (/usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.deny) not found => empty rule set Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kernel: kamailio[31063]: segfault at 80 ip 00007f7f4f9ffddc sp 00007fffde2f88a0 error 4 in db_cluster.so[7f7f4f9ec000+28000] Mar 9 17:11:50 localhost kamailio: ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:315]: daemonize(): Main process exited before writing to pipe Could this be a bug or is this a configuration issue? I tested the dbnodes and they seem to respond fine to any query's i send. Thanks, Jan Hazenberg

3 8

SIP 500 on WSS connection lookup failure
by Armen Babikyan 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I am setting up this scenario using Kamailio 4.2.2: [UA] <-> [kamailio1] <-> [kamailio2] <-> [other stuff] UA connects to kamailio1 using SIP/WSS, kamailio1 proxies request along to kamailio2. Note that my intent here is to have kamailio2 provide the registrar functionality. The kamailio2 (or something behind it) can also initiate transactions to UA, like OPTIONS, for example. I'm having an issue though: when the websocket connection between kamailio1 and UA dies, transaction requests from kamailio2 show up to kamailio1, and I get errors in kamailio1's logs because the WSS connection is gone. I get messages as follows (debug=2): Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: WARNING: <core> [msg_translator.c:2778]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1996]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:527]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1777]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches At debug=4, I get the output here: http://pastebin.com/d3RumekG In a running tshark, I see kamailio1 responding to kamailio2 with a "SIP/2.0 500 No error (2/TM)". It appears to me that this is happening before t_relay() even returns. Is there a way to prevent the SIP 500 from being sent back to the client? I am calling t_on_branch_failure("kam2bf") and t_on_failure("kam2f"), with each of those handlers (event_route[tm:branch-failure:kam2bf] and failure_route[kam2f]) written to print a log message, but it appears that neither of those handlers are being called. I tried installing these handlers independently to no avail. I also tried registering a t_on_reply() handler, thinking it was an internally-generated SIP response that might make it through my handler on its way out to kam2, but that is also not getting invoked. I want to return a 404 or something similar instead of having a 500 auto-returned for me. Related to this, is there a way to query kamailio's in-memory client connectivity data structure for the connectivity status of a client? Or is this something best done by keeping track of every client myself using (e.g.) localcache? Any pointers are appreciated. Thanks! Armen

2 3

help with a new install
by David Dunlap 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I am seeking help with a new test server. I have SIP messages coming from a working FreeSwitch and getting posted into the sip_capture table. Homer web service is responding allowing me to manage log on accounts and other database settings however I do not see any packets in the web gui. I used the install script from the web page and did not notice any errors as it worked. I sure would appreciate some help. The IRC channel was empty. Thanks David Dunlap [cid:D854C04A-3D89-4B99-AD05-D242790BFC94] 3105 N. Main St. East Peoria, IL 61611 Direct: 309-427-7226 Main: 309-427-7000 Fax: 309-427-7326 Email: ddunlap(a)heart.net www.heart.net

2 1

Transfer call between devices
by Phil Daws 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello: wish to ask how one may configure Kamailio so that if a user has a number of devices registered eg. deskphone, soft client on tablet, and soft client on cellphone when a call is originated or received how it can be passed between devices. Is it as simple as configuring a blind transfer ? Thanks for any help. Phil

2 1

4.2.3 textops: flag "f" doesn't work in subst_hf(hf, subexp, flags)
by Julia Boudniatsky 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I received INVITE with 3 Diversion headers. I try to make substitutions in the body of a first Diversion header field by using flag "f", command *subst_hf("Diversion", /sip:(.*)@/sip:$var(dU)@/", "f") ;* substitutes *all headers *Diversion instead of only first header, command *subst_hf("Diversion", /sip:(.*)@/sip:$var(dU)@/", "*l*") ;* substitutes only *last* Diversion header. Thanks for help, Julia.

2 3

core parsing of SIP message failed errors
by Jeff Cohn 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I finally got everything working but see to consistently receive the following 3 errors (see below) over and over when a call is being collected? Versions: Homer 3.6 kamailio 4.3.0-dev4 Captagent 4.2.0 Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeff ------------------------- Errors: Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=> Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message= Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1)

2 4

We’ve got free Tickets for CeBIT 2015!
by Carsten Bock 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, Due to our presentation at CeBIT 2015 at the Open-Source Business Alliance’s Booth, we’ve received a limited number of free tickets for CeBIT 2015! If you want a free ticket, please answer the following question: - What is the key benefit of deploying VoLTE in a mobile network? Send your answer to info(a)ng-voice.com (hint: we’ve got some benefits posted on our website: www.ng-voice.com/volte), I will send the ticket by email to the 5 best answers! Don’t miss my presentation on Kamailio & VoLTE at the booth of the Open-Source Business Alliance (www.osb-alliance.de), Tuesday, March 17th, ~2 PM, Hall 6, Stand H16, (410)! Thanks, Carsten -- Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer) ng-voice GmbH Schomburgstr. 80 D-22767 Hamburg / Germany http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com Office +49 40 5247593-0 Fax +49 40 5247593-99 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284 Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/

2 1

WARNING when querying data using db_mongodb
by Mickael Marrache 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, I'm continuously seeing the following WARNING in my logs: WARNING: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:454]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): unhandled data type column (instance) type id (10), use DB1_STRING as default It looks like the WARNING appears when data is fetched from the location collection. The instance field is always null in my case. Thanks, Mickael

2 1

Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Shankar 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to our customised code? Kindly clarify on this. Best Regards, Shankar

1 0

Dialog order of operations
by Alex Balashov 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, The dialog module documentation remains unclear about the order of operations with regard to when to call dlg_manage() or set the transaction flag. My impression is that dlg_manage() only registered TM callbacks, so it doesn't matter when you call it, as long as it's before t_relay(). However, the documentation neither confirms nor denies this. So, this raises the questions: 1) Is this okay? set_dlg_profile("caller", "$fU"); dlg_manage(); ... t_relay(); Or do I need to do this? dlg_manage(); set_dlg_profile("caller", "$fU"); ... t_relay(); 2) What about setting dialog-persistent variables? Is this okay? $dlg_var(account_id) = 49555; dlg_manage(); If so, where does the variable go if I never call dlg_manage() because the call is aborted beforehand, e.g. $dlg_var(account_id) = 49555; sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); exit; dlg_manage(); ... t_relay(); 3) Any other gotchas or caveats in relation to the order of operations? I suppose my preference would be to set the dialog profiles in various places throughout call processing and call dlg_manage() at the very end, right before t_relay(). Is this acceptable? Thanks, -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

2 9

Announcing rtpproxy v2.0.0
by Maxim Sobolev 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi All, I'm happy to announce that we have released rtpproxy v2.0.0. You can review the release notes here: https://github.com/sippy/rtpproxy/releases/tag/v2.0.0 -sobomax

1 0

Enable SNMP causes issue when forking exec_avp request
by Daniel Goepp 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

I have an issue that from what I can tell is related to forking. My configuration works just fine, and makes a request out to execute curl to hit an external API: $var(my_query) = "curl -m 2 -s http://x.x.x.x/service/method?fromAddr=" + $var(fu) + "\&toAddr=" + $var(tu); Normally this gives us back a nice JSON response, no problems. All I do is enable snmpstats module, and it fails. Mar 5 16:51:30 server-name /usr/sbin/kamailio[1051]: ERROR: exec [exec.c:291]: exec_avp(): cmd curl -m 2 -s http://x.x.x.x/service/method?fromAddr=me@mydomain.com\&toAddr=someone@mydo… failed. exit_status=-1, errno=10: No child processes I have edited this for security reasons of course. If I disable SNMP, the problem goes away. Thoughts?

2 1

rtpproxy failed to load
by Tom Braarup Cuykens 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

kb.asipto.com/kamailio:skype-like-service-in-less-than-one-hour I found this guide for an older version of Kamailio, but there seems to be some issues when trying to use it on the latest stable version. When I try to start Kamailio i get this : [....] 0(17153) INFO: tls [tls_init.c:399]: init_tls_compression(): tls: init_tls: disabling compression... 0(17153) ERROR: <core> [cfg.y:3286]: yyparse(): cfg. parser: failed to find command force_rtp_proxy (params 0) 0(17153) : <core> [cfg.y:3426]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 729, column 19: unknown command, missing loadmodule? 0(17153) ERROR: <core> [cfg.y:3286]: yyparse(): cfg. parser: failed to find command force_rtp_proxy (params 0) 0(17153) : <core> [cfg.y:3426]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config fil[FAILc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 806, column 19: unknown command, missing loadmodule? ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) ... It seems it cannot load the rtpproxy module or that force_rtp_proxy command does not exist. For Debian the modules are located in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/ and it was found there, seems to be loaded in the config file (line 5 and 235). According to the rtpproxy doc the module has this command. Does anyone have an idea what could be the issue ? I am planning to update this guide for the current version once I fixed all the issues. The most easy issues are the db/usernames/password and the path to the modules. -- Med venlig hilsen Tom Braarup Cuykens plusTEL.dk

2 1

lua_run seems to be working in asynchronous way
by José Seabra 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi there, I'm using kamailio version 4.2.2 to a short time, and I'm using lua scripts to build some avps with information needed to make calls(lua functions uses redis as source data to build avp data.), what i have noticed today making some tests is that when i make a call my lua function: if(!lua_run("get_prefs","$fU","$fd")) { xdbg("SCRIPT: failed to execute lua function!\n"); } kamailio gets the avp's after send the invite to the destine,(the invite will fail because kamailio needs avp information). it seems that kamailio calls the lua_run in asynchronous way, i never noticed that before in old version. is that a normal behavior or it is an issue in this version? Best Regards -- Cumprimentos José Seabra

2 5

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, I set up tcp and udp for right now to test all config and dialog is not established correctly. Call between extensions not working. Call from extesnsion to extension going right a way to voicemail. Any help thank you. Here one call debug. http://fpaste.org/195572/14258553/ Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:08:19 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Is notify should follow subscribe routes ? Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me. <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SUBSCRIBE sip:10102@networklab.ca SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5081;transport=tls;lr=on;ftag=08c99307d3;nat=yes> Accept: application/simple-message-summary Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKdee2.b83c2028dc57c641d2b8cad968347d6a.0;i=2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.16:5063;rport=5063;received=client_pub_ip;branch=z9hG4bK0c54032bd8905d262 Max-Forwards: 69 From: "10102" <sips:10102@networklab.ca>;tag=08c99307d3 To: <sips:10102@networklab.ca> Call-ID: cea703eb8c21f709 CSeq: 1096440084 SUBSCRIBE Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, MESSAGE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Allow-Events: message-summary Authorization: Digest username="10102",realm="networklab.ca",nonce="29ac01f1",uri="sips:10102@networklab.ca",response="0298c2a93bdd4969a3cd0b757d671dbb",algorithm=MD5 Contact: <sips:10102@client_pub_ip:5063>;audio Event: message-summary Expires: 3600 Supported: eventlist, replaces, timer User-Agent: Media5-fone/4.1.6.3283 Android/4.1.2 Content-Length: 0 Path: <sip:outbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:client_pub_ip:5063%3Btransport%3Dtls> P-hint: outbound Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:50:03 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I pushed a fix for it -- the issue was in a LM_DBG() trying to print te address for local socket, but it was not set yet, it was affecting only when running in debug mode with debug=3. I pushed the patch to branch 4.2, so if you want the fix, then you have to install from git branch 4.2. For REGISTER, you need to add the Path header (see path module), otherwise the OPTIONS and INVITE sent out to the phone are not going via Kamailio. You have to check the version of your Asterisk to be one that supports Path. Cheers, Daniel On 27/02/15 14:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060> ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

Group call advice: remove calling branch after alias_db_lookup/lookup_branches
by Anthony Messina 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

In terms of implementing "group" calling via the append_branch feature of both alias_db_lookup followed by lookup_branches, I'm looking for a reliable way to ensure that if the caller happens to be a member of the group (list of branches), the branch that's created to the original caller is dropped. Originally, I was thinking of comparing $rU and $fU in branch_route, but this would limit the ability for one contact of an AOR to call another contact of the same AOR. Can anyone offer an example of an efficient method to accomplish this? -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 3

ndb_redis set <null> reply to EXISTS query
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

Hello I try to get some replies from redis. Time after time redis request give me null result. But redis bs not disconnected. This happens only with websocket endpoints. My queries is: redis_cmd("srv1", "EXISTS $si", "s"); So at xLOG i see that $si correctly sended, but result is null. At db I keep key IP with value TIMESTAMP Intresting that route, that givesme this result idependend of WS or UDP endpoint. IT does not know about it anything.

2 11

Route Between WebSockets without rtpengine getting into the mix
by Don Fanning 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hello All, Prior to going down the rtpengine path for another need, calling was working fine between WSS client. Now that I've added in some pieces from caruizdiaz's config [ https://github.com/caruizdiaz/kamailio-ws/blob/master/kamailio-ws.cfg] relating to SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT, it has broken that functionality. Is there a way to skip rtpengine if the originator and destination are both on wss? route[RELAY] { # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. if (is_method("INVITE|BYE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); } if (is_method("INVITE")) { route(SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT); if(!t_is_set("failure_route")) t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } route[SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT] { if ($ru =~ "transport=ws") { xlog("L_INFO", "Request going to WS"); if(sdp_with_transport("RTP/SAVPF")) { rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force DTLS=passive"); t_on_reply("REPLY_WS_TO_WS"); return; } #rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force DTLS=passive RTP/SAVP"); t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); } else if ($proto =~ "ws") { xlog("L_INFO", "Request coming from WS"); rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove DTLS=passive RTP/SAVP"); t_on_reply("REPLY_TO_WS"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "This is a classic phone call"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); } } Thanks for any help! -Don

2 1

segfault problem with unixodbc module
by Lucas Wals Ochoa 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hello, this is the first time I send a question here, hope my english is good enough to explain my problem. I have a Kamailio 4.1.8+RTPProxy setup working, but recently I saw RTP Engine proxy, so I decided to give a try. I installed the latest kamailio stable version (4.2.3) and adapt the configuration I have(that uses a MariaDB database), to try the rtpengine module, but I couldn't even start kamailio process, cause I received a segfault problem at unixodbc module. The version of unixodbc that I installed is 2.3.1-10 That was the first time I encounter this error. I thought that maybe the database I have created with the version 4.1.8 wasn't compatible, so I decided to create a new database, but the problem persisted. So I'm here to know if someone know something about this, or have had a similar problem. I attached the system log for Kamailio, and a backtrace I made using "gdb" with the corefile that Kamailio creates when it crash. Log: Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Starting SYSV: Kamailio is a fast, reliable and flexible SIP Server.... Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1392]: fix_hostname(): could not rev. resolve 10.0.0.70 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: WARNING: tm [tm.c:845]: mod_init(): WARNING: mod_init: reparse_on_dns_failover is enabled on a multihomed host -- check the readme of tm module! Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: auth [auth_mod.c:350]: mod_init(): auth: qop set, but nonce-count (nc_enabled) support disabled Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kernel: kamailio[2369]: segfault at 10070 ip 00007fc3d554df7e sp 00007fff89556450 error 4 in libmyodbc5w.so[7fc3d5527000+47000] Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:315]: daemonize(): Main process exited before writing to pipe Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: Starting kamailio: Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: kamailio.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Failed to start SYSV: Kamailio is a fast, reliable and flexible SIP Server.. Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Unit kamailio.service entered failed state. Backtrace of gdb: Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid -m 64 -M 8 -u kamailio -g kamailio'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007fc3d554df7e in get_ctype () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install kamailio-4.2.3-3.1.x86_64 (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fc3d554df7e in get_ctype () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #1 0x00007fc3d554dfac in init_parser () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #2 0x00007fc3d554ec41 in parse () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #3 0x00007fc3d5553484 in prepare () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #4 0x00007fc3d5559e9c in SQLPrepareWImpl () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #5 0x00007fc3d5559eb9 in SQLExecDirectW () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #6 0x00007fc3de43b05f in SQLExecDirect () from /lib64/libodbc.so.2 #7 0x00007fc3de695302 in db_unixodbc_submit_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_unixodbc.so #8 0x00007fc3de21522e in db_do_submit_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #9 0x00007fc3de215cf7 in db_do_query_internal () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #10 0x00007fc3de21661a in db_do_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #11 0x00007fc3de696d90 in db_unixodbc_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_unixodbc.so #12 0x00007fc3de20ce90 in db_table_version () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #13 0x00007fc3da209693 in init_ds_db () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/dispatcher.so #14 0x00007fc3da1f4f1a in mod_init () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/dispatcher.so #15 0x0000000000520e8d in init_mod () #16 0x0000000000520be8 in init_mod () #17 0x000000000052119a in init_modules () #18 0x0000000000517951 in main () Hope someone can help me. Thanks in advance.

3 5

WARNING: <core> [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added"?
by Anthony Messina 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means "WARNING: <core> [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added"? I just started seeing this after pulling down 5c1a9df from git and it seems like something that I probably don't want happening. -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

3 13

wss calls between devices works but strange error
by Don Fanning 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hi All, I'm placing calls between two devices over WSS and sipML5. Connection seems to work and stays up (despite some grumbling sometimes with 603 failed to get local SDP) but my question is the following log entries - could someone translate what is happening here? Thanks! Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL)

2 1

How to Use Multiple DMQ Notification Addresses
by Robert Boisvert 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hello all, I would like to setup a DMQ bus where servers can come on and offline and have DMQ continue working with the online servers. I'm having trouble understanding how to do that with the notification address. Can someone point me in the right direction? More specifically, suppose I have five servers named A, B, C, D, and E. I would like all of them to be on the DMQ bus when active but they may come up at different times. For example, when A, B and C start I want each of them to be on the same DMQ bus. However, the way I understand it, if I make E the notification address none will be on the bus because E is not active. I could create a circular notification chain where A uses B as a notification server, B uses C, and so on. Of course, there are problems when one or more servers are missing from the chain. Any help on this is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bob

2 3

SCA fails to update appearance
by Andreas Granig 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi guys, Playing with SCA for the first time, I'm hittin the following issue: User phone1(a)domain.org is registered on two devices A and B, and device B sends SUBSCRIBE to phone1(a)domain.org with call-info Event. Subscription is handled properly, and my DB content is this: id: 4 subscriber: sip:phone1@10.15.20.174:5100;alias=1.2.3.4~5100~1 aor: sip:phone1@domain.org event: 1 expires: 1425296906 state: 0 app_idx: 0 call_id: dacf5194-3d6a8e16d03338102a940080f0e9071c(a)10.15.20.174 from_tag: 4247246264 to_tag: f3067022b00c564156251ba2f28f331f-7c92 record_route: <sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=4247246264;nat=yes;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:1.2.3.4:5060>,<sip:1.2.3.4;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=4247246264;nat=yes;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:1.2.3.4:5060> notify_cseq: 3 subscribe_cseq: 2 Kamcmd reports this: kamcmd> sca.all_subscriptions phone1 10.15.20.174:5100 call-info 2697 active If phone1(a)domain.org on device A does a call, I get this in my logs when calling sca_call_info_update() right as first thing in my routing config handling the INVITE: Mar 2 12:02:33 sp2 proxy[34517]: WARNING: sca [sca_appearance.c:976]: sca_appearance_update_index(): Cannot update sip:phone1@domain.org index 0 to unknown: index 0 not in use Mar 2 12:02:33 sp2 proxy[34517]: ERROR: sca [sca_call_info.c:1046]: sca_call_info_invite_request_handler(): Failed to update sip:phone1@domain.org appearance-index 0 to unknown Is there something I'm obviously doing wrong here? Andreas

2 4

switch called number
by jaflong jaflong 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi Guys I want to archive this setup Kamailio to switch called number and the switch to be hidden from the client so there should be no mention of the switched number in any of the messages back to the client. for example phone client calls "alex" kamailio to switch "alex" to "54321" and send to asterisk on response from asterisk, kamailio to revert all references to "54321" back to "alex" before send to client Any suggestions please

2 1

TLS conversion
by Kelvin Chua 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

I have 2 kamailio servers and 1 asterisk server. 1. asterisk calls kamailio1 2. kamailio1 relays INVITE to kamailio2 3. kamailio2 relays INVITE to client registered using TLS 4. client answers with 200 OK, sends to kamailio2 5. kamailio2 relays 200 OK to kamailio1 6. kamailio1 relays 200 OK to asterisk 7. asterisk sends ACK to kamailio1 8. kamailio1 complains "forward_request(): forward_req: ERROR: cannot forward to af 2, proto 3 no corresponding listening socket" which is because 200 OK has a contact header with tls transport from client 9. call drops in 30 secs which is expected because client never received the ACK any ideas on a fix or workaround? Kelvin Chua

2 7

Any suggestion if I just want to update one or some modules?
by jack wang 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

For example, If I modify only the registrar module, I thought the steps were: 1. make modules=modules\registrar modules 2. copy the registrar.so to the installed path And when starting kamailio I got the error message below: ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:417]: version_control(): ERROR: module compile flags mismatch for [my installed path]/registrar.so I've searched for the answer and it seems to need to re-build and re-install kamailio and all the module again... Is there more efficient way for just updating the specified module ?? Thanks a lot.:)

2 2

Can following scenario be implemented using Kamilio
by Jayanth Acharya 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be configured to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302 response from B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by the updated Contact URI) ? Alternatively, is there a way for the B-party SIP UAS to get the proxy (Kamilio) to forward the INVITE (from A-party) to C-party ? Does Kamilio have to be configured to act in a specific / non-default role ? In doing so, B-party receives no further SIP messages for this particular dialog. thanks, J

3 14

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Is notify should follow subscribe routes ? Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me. <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SUBSCRIBE sip:10102@networklab.ca SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5081;transport=tls;lr=on;ftag=08c99307d3;nat=yes> Accept: application/simple-message-summary Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKdee2.b83c2028dc57c641d2b8cad968347d6a.0;i=2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.16:5063;rport=5063;received=client_pub_ip;branch=z9hG4bK0c54032bd8905d262 Max-Forwards: 69 From: "10102" <sips:10102@networklab.ca>;tag=08c99307d3 To: <sips:10102@networklab.ca> Call-ID: cea703eb8c21f709 CSeq: 1096440084 SUBSCRIBE Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, MESSAGE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Allow-Events: message-summary Authorization: Digest username="10102",realm="networklab.ca",nonce="29ac01f1",uri="sips:10102@networklab.ca",response="0298c2a93bdd4969a3cd0b757d671dbb",algorithm=MD5 Contact: <sips:10102@client_pub_ip:5063>;audio Event: message-summary Expires: 3600 Supported: eventlist, replaces, timer User-Agent: Media5-fone/4.1.6.3283 Android/4.1.2 Content-Length: 0 Path: <sip:outbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:client_pub_ip:5063%3Btransport%3Dtls> P-hint: outbound Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:50:03 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I pushed a fix for it -- the issue was in a LM_DBG() trying to print te address for local socket, but it was not set yet, it was affecting only when running in debug mode with debug=3. I pushed the patch to branch 4.2, so if you want the fix, then you have to install from git branch 4.2. For REGISTER, you need to add the Path header (see path module), otherwise the OPTIONS and INVITE sent out to the phone are not going via Kamailio. You have to check the version of your Asterisk to be one that supports Path. Cheers, Daniel On 27/02/15 14:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060> ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

REmove Header line with tags
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

I need to remove all header line witht tags but remove_hf() removes only Header:value All tags after ";" stay at the packet as garbage and next Header moves up As there ACK sip:12345678900@phone.provider.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.server.com:5068 ;branch=z9hG4bKcb7a.9f70ce5990dd153cd0eaa6f1762c059c.0.cs102 *<There var another Via header that I removed with remove_hf_re but tags is stiil there and Route header mover up>*;rport=1578;received=23.101.134.111Route: <sip:54.241.2.206;lr=on;ftag=as38f20f7b;did=ce8.10a> Max-Forwards: 70 From: "New User" <sip:00987654321@phone.provider.com>;tag=as38f20f7b To: <sip:12345678900@phone.provider.com>;tag=B4r1B569001DB Contact: <sip:contact@10.0.1.17:50600;alias=23.101.134.111~1578~1> Call-ID: 473fc8a64d7d96aa515780dc6237a6d5@10.0.1.17:50600 CSeq: 103 ACK User-Agent: Some Device Content-Length: 0

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Kamailio as a SIP softphone to WebRTC/SIP-over-websockets proxy?
by Rion Carter 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

I'm pretty new to SIP, RTP/SRTP, WebRTC and Websockets, so I hope this question is coherent. I have a group of SIP Softphones that need to connect to a WebRTC/SIP-over-Websockets server. Can Kamailio be configured to let me do this? Any examples, tutorials or documentation would be appreciated. I'm trying to determine how feasible this task is. :) Thanks!

2 2

db_mysql errors
by jaflong jaflong 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

I am getting errors when I run the following code if (sql_xquery("mydb", "select * from account where account = 'demo'", "res") == 1) { xlog("L_INFO", "my number: $xavp(res=>number)\n"); } else { xlog("L_WARN", "Connection forbidden from $si\n"); sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); exit; } sql_result_free("res"); } 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_ut.c:225]: db_str2time(): Error during time conversion 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_val.c:159]: db_str2val(): error while converting datetime value from string 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_row.c:68]: db_mysql_convert_row(): failed to convert value 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_res.c:190]: db_mysql_convert_rows(): error while converting row #0 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_res.c:219]: db_mysql_convert_result(): error while converting rows 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:252]: db_mysql_store_result(): error while converting result 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:188]: db_do_raw_query(): error while storing result10(4033) ERROR: sqlops [sql_api.c:454]: sql_exec_xquery(): cannot do the query Any help please

2 3

kamctl: command not available
by Thomas Baeumer 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hi there, I want to use kamctl to monitor the state of a sip-proxy. I just have no idea which commands are available or should i use "kamctl mi" or "kamctl fifo" commands. Google dont give helpful links for that. Im am using kamailio 4.2.3+wheezy on a Debian wheezy and kamctrl dont work: # kamctl fifo uptime Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd uptime 500 command 'uptime' not available FIFO command was: :uptime:kamailio_receiver_19959 # kamctl fifo which Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd which 500 command 'which' not available FIFO command was: :which:kamailio_receiver_19985 # kamctl mi which Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd which 500 command 'which' not available FIFO command was: :which:kamailio_receiver_20016 here is my config: # grep -i fifo kamailio.cfg loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", "kamailio") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_mode", 0640) # ls -la /tmp/kam* srw-r----- 1 kamailio root 0 Feb 27 12:39 /tmp/kamailio_ctl prw-r----- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 Feb 27 14:25 /tmp/kamailio_fifo The only known command what is working is to look into a hashtable: # kamctl mi sht_dump foo Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd sht_dump foo Entry:: 135 sip:0049xxxxxxxxxxx@sip.domain.tld:: 1 Entry:: 205 sip:0049yyyyyyyyyyy@sip.domain.tld:: 1 FIFO command was: :sht_dump:kamailio_receiver_20144 foo any idea what is wrong? and is there a documentation how to use "kamcrl mi" and "kamctl fifo"? Thanks Thomas

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + SIP Over WebSocket examples
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hello, sr-users is the mailing list more appropriate for such discussions that the docs. However, you wrote to -owner address which is not the mailing list discussions address but mailing list control address. For the topic, look at the readme of the websocket module, it gives a sample for starting with webrtc. On github (search for), Carlos Ruiz Diaz has some more advanced examples. Cheers, Daniel On 02/03/15 06:48, vineet wrote: > Hi Geeks, > > I was trying to search the good article, blog or tutorials to get > working Kamailio + WEBRTC model i have found some but those are not > worth it to me because I am beginner on it. Folk if anyone has > experience about it or having an idea about it, please refer or > forward to me. > > Thanks In advance. > > Best Regards, > -Vineet > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 2

Kamailio + SIP Over WebSocket examples
by vineet 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hi Geeks, I was trying to search the good article, blog or tutorials to get working Kamailio + WEBRTC model i have found some but those are not worth it to me because I am beginner on it. Folk if anyone has experience about it or having an idea about it, please refer or forward to me. Thanks In advance . Best Regards, -Vineet

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 28 Feb '15

28 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Trying resolve issue with NOTIFY and OPTIONS that it will be send to client through kamailio from asterisk. 1. SUBSCRIBE record routes (works). On asterisk I see two records routes. 2. NOTIFY from asterisk should re use Records routes from SUBSCRIBE and send it to the client (works). I see in asterisk logs Route record. 3. NOTIFY received, but kamailio should send to client (not working). I see To: private Ip of the client or #4. 4. NOTIFY|OPTIONS sips to sip translation (not working). I see To: <sip:sips: none substr_uri helps include $rz. Here SDP conversation. http://fpaste.org/191761/14251457/ Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 192.168.88.252:5064 failed (RST) Connection refused Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 192.168.88.252:5064: connect & send for 0x7f00ed4a1228 failed: Connection refused (111) Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: tm [../../forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: WARNING: tm [t_fwd.c:1608]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request on branch 0 failed Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 8:40:10 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios
by Sebastian Damm 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hi, while testing IPv6 with customers, we fell over quite a few cases, where customers aren't reachable on inbound calls most of the time. And digging into this, we found the home router firewall as the cause for those problems. Normally, you would think, all the NAT problems cease when switching to IPv6. But actually, right now I don't know how to fix that problem. In IPv4 NAT scenarios, we would flag the customer during the registration, and Kamailio would send NAT pings (those 4 bytes of UDP junk) every few seconds to keep the firewall in the NAT router open. And that worked pretty great. Now we have IPv6. We don't have NAT. But we still have a home router in front of SIP devices, with a firewall. And this firewall will allow outbound traffic. But after a few seconds it won't allow incoming connections anymore. And the routers I have seen so far don't have a configurable firewall where you could allow inbound traffic from our server. Unfortunately, only our load balancer is IPv6, our registrar is still IPv4 only. And the loadbalancer doesn't know anything about registrations and which customer needs an IPv6 keepalive. Does anyone have a hint, how to keep the IPv6 registrations alive? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Sebastian

5 12

TEXTOPS parser problem with binary data in MIME body
by Federico San Martín 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hi Klaus, did you find a solution to this problem? I'm working with SIP-I and having the same issue with Binary encoding. I need to encode a 0x00 value and when the config script gets to that point, it breaks. If I encode any other hex value it's fine. This is the config part I'm using: route[INSERT_ACM]{ if(has_body()){ # Save the SDP body for future reference $var(sdp_body) = $rb; replace_body_atonce("^.+$", ""); remove_hf("Content-Type"); append_hf("MIME-Version: 1.0\r\n", "Content-Length"); append_hf("Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=unique-boundary-1\r\n", "Allow"); replace_body_atonce("^.+$", "--unique-boundary-1\r\nContent-Disposition: signal; handling=optional\r\nContent-Type: application/isup; version=itu-t92+\r\n\r\n'\x06''\x02''\x04''\x01''\x29''\x01''\x01''\x00'\r\n-unique-boundary-1\r\n"); msg_apply_changes(); replace_body_all("\047", ""); append_body_part("$var(sdp_body)","application/sdp"); } return; } I tried with the escape character \0 which should be translated to ASCII hex value '00' but it's parsed as ASCII literal values \0... Thanks! Federico Federico San Martín e-mail : fsanmartin(a)telecentro.net.ar On 9/17/13 4:34 PM, Daniel wrote: > Hello, > > most of the functions for pseudo-variables work with string types, that > because a script variable can have only integer or string values. Even > the length can be higher, these functions truncate at first 0. But > internally all should be kept, just not passed to config variables. > > Have you tried exec_msg(), that should pass entire msg? > > Otherwise, I presume there is need for some C coding to make binary > values work with variables in config. > > Cheers, > Daniel On 9/17/13 4:03 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote: > Hello, > > I have an update to the side effects of receiving an INVITE message that > contains a MIME body with binary data: > - pseudo variables are affected, too > - the message buffer ($mb) does not include the whole message; it is > ending with the nul character > - as the message buffer does not include all data, the modification > cannot be done with an external script / program (e.g. perl, bash script) > > The behaviour was tested with kamailio 4.0.3, too - no difference! > > In general, the whole message is stored in a buffer, but parts of it are > inaccessible for parsing / text functions. > > Any idea, what could cause this problem? > > regards, > Klaus > >> Hello, >> >> I have a problem with Kamailio version 3.2.4 (tested also with 3.3.5) >> regarding "binary data" in message bodies. According RFC3261 it is >> explicitly allowed using binary data within MIME bodies: >> >> RFC 3261 section 7.4.1: SIP messages MAY contain binary bodies or body >> parts. When no explicit charset parameter is provided by the sender, >> media subtypes of the "text" type are defined to have a default charset >> value of "UTF-8". >> >> However, the Kamailio function "Regular Expression Transformation" >> (re.subst), which is based on the transformation class (exported by the >> textops module) is causing problems in our customer system. In regular >> scenarios, Kamailio is receiving SIP INVITE messages with a MIME body, >> which is containing following parts: >> - application/sdp (standard conform) >> - application/x-q931 (Cisco proprietary with BINARY data!) >> - application/gtd (Cisco proprietary with ASCII strings) >> >> The content of the "x-q931" and "gtd" body parts is depending on (UUS1) >> data that were received on the ISDN line. Kamailio has to forward >> User-User specific information from the ISDN line to SIP user agents (in >> form of the "User-to-User" header field). The content of these UUS1 data >> may contain also byte values "00", which is legitimate. In general, >> Kamailio is in every INVITE message searching specific content in the >> last body (application/gtd) and copying this content to a config >> variable. As soon as the x-q931 body contains nul values (0x00 in binary >> format), the parser stops at this position and cannot parse the rest of >> the message. Therefore, I am missing the information that should be >> copied to the SIP header field, as the parser stops before the end of >> the message body! >> >> As long as the message body does not contain 0x00, it is working fine! >> >> My question is: >> - is this a bug in Kamailio parsing functions? >> - is this a design issue of Kamailio text parsers (as binary data are >> allowed acc. RFC3261) - does anybody know a solution for this problem? >> This "bug" is causing big troubles.... >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Klaus Feichtinger >> >> >> P.S. trace data (1)...(3) of my problem >> >> (1) exemplary content of the x-q931 body >> ======================Sending: Binary Message Body >> Sep 13 10:50:19: Content-Type: application/x-q931 >> 08 01 B4 05 04 03 80 90 A2 18 01 89 1E 02 82 88 6C 05 B1 35 30 30 34 70 >> 05 B1 35 30 30 31 7D 02 91 81 7E 18 04 1D 42 75 25 92 43 31 62 94 00 00 >> 2C 68 20 64 00 62 F2 10 41 B9 D7 BD 0D 0A >> >> (2) SIP INVITE message (debugger view) >> =============================INVITE sip:115101@<ipv4>:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: >> SIP/2.0/UDP <ipv4>:5060;branch=z9hG4bK171164E >> From: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>>;tag=29E16410-2541 >> To: <sip:115101@<ipv4>> >> Call-ID: 1DBCDACB-1B9911E3-8992FF70-D2BED293@<ipv4> >> Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat >> Min-SE: 90 >> CSeq: 101 INVITE >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Contact: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>:5060> >> Expires: 1800 >> P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>> >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=uniqueBoundary >> Mime-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Length: 820 >> >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session;handling=required >> >> v=0 >> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 1770 5294 IN IP4 <ipv4> >> s=SIP Call >> c=IN IP4 <ipv4> >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 8 0 >> c=IN IP4 <ipv4> >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 >> >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/x-q931 >> Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional >> Content-Length: 62 >> 4" l15004p15001}~Bu%C1b..,h d.brA9W >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/gtd >> Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional >> >> IAM, >> PRN,isdn*,,, >> USI,rate,c,s,c,1 >> USI,lay1,ulaw >> TMR,00 >> CPN,08,,1,5001 >> CGN,08,,1,,,5004 >> UUS,3,1d427525924331629400002c6820640062f21041b9d7bd >> CPC,09 >> FCI,,,,,,,y, >> GCI,185ef1291b9911e381d500270dff3fa0 >> >> --uniqueBoundary-- >> >> (3) config excerpt >> ============if (has_body("multipart/mixed")) { >> if (filter_body("application/sdp")) { >> remove_hf("Mime-Version"); >> remove_hf("Content-Type"); >> append_hf("Content-Type: application/sdp\r\n"); >> } else { >> xlog("L_WARN", " <route> message body part 'application/sdp' not >> found\n"); >> } >> $var(UUS)=$(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)UUS,.,([a-z0-9,]*)..[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z],(.*)/\2/s}); >> append_hf("User-to-User: $var(UUS)\r\n", "CSeq"); >> >> if >> !(subst_body('/Content-Disposition..session.handling=required....//s')) >> { >> xlog("L_WARN", " <route> substituting Content-Disposition >> FAILED!!! \n"); >> } >> msg_apply_changes(); >> if (search_body("a=[a-z]+:.+[\r\n]{4}$")) { >> #!ifdef WITH_XLOGDEBUG >> xlog("L_INFO", " <route> double CRLF at the end of the message >> body detected - is reduced to one now. \n"); #!endif >> $var(sdp) = $(rb{s.striptail,2}); >> set_body("$var(sdp)", "application/sdp"); >> } >> } >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Oct 21-24; Miami, Nov 11-13, 2013 > - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips: . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_BEGIN Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

allow_trusted and ipv6 addresses
by Sergey Okhapkin 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

allow_trusted() function of permissions module doesn't work right with ipv6 addresses - it treats IP addresses as strings and doesn't take into account variations aaa:bbb::0 vs aaa:bbb:0:0:0:0:0:0.

4 9

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

3 2

Hide Redirection from UAC
by ron.kamailio＠mcleodnet.com 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

I have an instance of Kamailio configured as an outbound proxy and I want to be able to hide the fact the a 3XX redirection result may have been encountered while attempting to route the call. I am using the fragment below and it does appear to work, but I am wondering if there is a better way. failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if (t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]")) { append_branch($(T_rpl($ct){nameaddr.uri})); route(RELAY); exit; } } Thanks.

2 3

source websocket ip address
by jaflong jaflong 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

On a request received over websocket how can the ip address of the http server that jssip library connected through and send the call from be know?

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, Thank you for all help and last solution getting closer, client register, but I see in log Feb 25 13:13:00 canlvprx01 kamailio: 3(5051) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [52]; uri=[sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5066] Feb 25 13:13:00 canlvprx01 kamailio: 3(5051) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5066> <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/TM) Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1bddbf73;rport=5060;received=10.18.130.50 From: "capbxsrv01" <sip:capbxsrv01@10.18.130.50>;tag=as7c3f6955 To: <sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5063>;tag=6eb8dc78f5 Call-ID: 08a2c6f10b91e480 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux)) Content-Length: 0 I think need updated $ru for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY. Please let me know what additional information required for backtrace. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:04:28 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_BEGIN Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

3 2

usrloc table to redis
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

Hello. We try to use redis for maximum features of kamailio. We already realise dispatcher (not as module, but I want to do it at the future), and now we want to relocate usrloc to redis. Does anyone do this with Redis?

2 1

RTPEngine IPv4 to IPv6 bridging returning c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 on answer?
by Anthony Messina 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

This is probably very likely a configuration issue on my part, but I wanted to check before reporting an RTPEngine bug... Thank you for any pointers or suggestions. This is a multi-homed server where em1: INTERNAL_IPv4 & GLOBAL_IPv6 em2: EXTERNAL_IPv4 Note that below, the IPv6 address on my server is the same on priv and pub and is reachable from "internal" and "external" endpoints. I have it set this way as I eventually want to use ICE and have it create the proper IPv4/IPv6 candidates regardless of the RTPEngine --interface. I'm running RTPEngine with the following: /usr/sbin/rtpengine --table=0 --interface=pub/EXTERNAL_IPv4 --interface=pub/GLOBAL_IPv6 --interface=priv/INTERNAL_IPv4 --interface=priv/GLOBAL_IPv6 --listen-ng=127.0.0.1:12221 --tos=184 --log-level=7 --pidfile=/run/rtpengine/rtpengine.test.pid I'm trying to bridge an IPv4-initated call to an IPv6 carrier. The call seems to flow properly until the carrier's SDP is passed through RTPEngine on answer. The snippets are here, and I have attached the full log. [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Received command 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786 [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Dump for 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786: { "sdp": "v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1424799070 1424799071 IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 t=0 0 m=audio 24308 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:24309 IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 The CARRIER_IPv6 gets converted as follows with 0.0.0.0 in place of what should be the address of my RTPEngine instance. Shouldn't it be returning the IPv4 address of my RTPEngine instance (either priv or pub as called from Kamailio)? [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Replying to 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786 [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Response dump for 'answer' to 127.0.0.1:38786: { "sdp": "v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1424799070 1424799071 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 t=0 0 m=audio 38914 RTP/SAVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:38915 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:Jby5IPt4WlNySLd66eK+Mcky8yJeUwp7dWH7W3aO -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

3 4

db_mysql module compile error
by jaflong jaflong 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

On compiling I get this error km_dbase.c:38:25: fatal error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory #include <mysql/mysql.h> ^ I have installed mysql using the standard install from tar.gz binary This places the prefix for install in /usr/local/mysql the include dir is /usr/local/mysql/include result of running mysql_config --include is -I/usr/local/mysql/include #ls /usr/local/mysql/include big_endian.h little_endian.h my_config.h my_pthread.h mysql.h plugin.h typelib.h byte_order_generic.h m_ctype.h my_dbug.h mysql mysql_time.h plugin_validate_password.h byte_order_generic_x86_64.h m_string.h my_dir.h mysql_com.h mysql_version.h sql_common.h byte_order_generic_x86.h my_alloc.h my_getopt.h mysql_com_server.h my_sys.h sql_state.h decimal.h my_attribute.h my_global.h mysqld_ername.h my_xml.h sslopt-case.h errmsg.h my_byteorder.h my_list.h mysqld_error.h plugin_audit.h sslopt-longopts.h keycache.h my_compiler.h my_net.h mysql_embed.h plugin_ftparser.h sslopt-vars.h as listed the header files a here I notice mysql.h in in /usr/local/mysql/include and not in the sub directory (/usr/local/mysql/include/mysql) Any suggestion on how to get this compiled

2 2

Kamailio Security Policy - How to handle vulnerability reports
by Olle E. Johansson 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Kamailians! During our last developer meeting, we had a discussion about implementing a security policy for the project. I drafted a proposal that seemed fine with the developer team. At this point, I'm looking for your feedback. The proposal is short and brief at this point, we'll learn as we go. Much of it is inspired by the policy of the Asterisk project. You can find it here: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/securitypolicy We encourage your feedback! - Is this a good thing for the project? - Do you have any changes to the policy to suggest? At this point, we're not looking for support systems for this, or any software platform - we're focusing on getting the policy right, then we're going to look on how to implement it. Looking forward to your responses! Best regards, /Olle

3 5

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/sip:\1/'); subst("/sips:/sip:/g"); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/sip:\1/'); subst("/sips:/sip:/g"); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca>, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca>;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca>(24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org>, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org>(24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50>:5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>, using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca>, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca>;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca>(24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org>, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org>(24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50>:5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>, using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

TLS t_replicate
by Kelvin Chua 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

serverA listens on both UDP and TLS serverB listens on UDP only client registers to serverA via UDP. serverA uses t_replicate (;transport=udp) sends register to serverB all looks good client registers to serverA via TLS serverA uses t_replicate (;transport=udp) but no packet comes out of kamailio :( how is it supposed to be done? any ideas? Kelvin Chua

1 1

2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config & IPv6 client
by Anthony Messina 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction for the following two issues with Kamailio and tls.cfg 1. When attempting to configure TLS settings for connecting to a specific IPv4 client, it seems that the ca_list indicated in [client:default] overrides the one in the client-specific config. If I don't include the client's CA in the [client:default] section, I get the following, regardless of what is in [client:204.74.213.5:5061]. ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1230]: tls_read_f(): TLS write:error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed [client:default] method = TLSv1+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = no private_key = /etc/kamailio/key.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/crt.pem verify_depth = 2 # In order for the client below to work, the ca_list here needs to support # contain the CA for the specific client. Not sure why, maybe a bug? #ca_list = /etc/pki/CA/myownCA.pem # Can't use this one ca_list = /etc/kamailio/kamailio.tls.ca_list.pem # Contains ALL client CA's [client:204.74.213.5:5061] method = TLSv1+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes verify_depth = 2 ca_list = /etc/kamailio/204.74.213.5.crt.pem 2. When attempting to configure TLS settings for connecting to a specific IPv6 client, I cannot figure out the syntax needed to specify the IPv6 client. What is the proper syntax? With [client:[2607:5300:60:1f93::0]:5061], I get: ERROR: tls [tls_config.c:71]: parse_ipv6(): tls.cfg:57:9: Invalid IPv6 address Any guidance is appreciated. Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 9

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 117, Issue 23
by Euan Thoms 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 04:25:14 +0100 > From: Markus <universe(a)truemetal.org> > To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] NAT SIPPING in a FreeBSD jail > Message-ID: <54E94C1A.6000704(a)truemetal.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Am 21.02.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Euan Thoms: > > ** My question is: how do I force the ping behaviour in NAT SIPping feature? I need a trigger to further debug. > > Just an idea in general: Attach to the kamailio process(es) with strace > with trace output to a file and the moment it crashes you should have > some more data. I think I found the problem. I think it was nothing to do with NAT SIPping. I had to patch ip_addr.h because Clang on FreeBSD was not finding the INADDR_LOCALHOST definition from netinet/in.h, despite it being there in FreeBSDs' /usr/include. So previously I defined it as an 'unsigned long'. Now that I have defined it in ip_addr.h as a 'u_int32_t' Kamailio has not crashed since. Also, I no longer get any errors in my /var/log/messages when Linphone closes. I have yet to re-enable WITH_NATSIPPING, I want to wait a bit longer before drawing any further conclussions. Thanks and regards to all the Kamailio devs, Euan Thoms.

1 0

Textops Module - Multipart Body conversion
by Federico San Martín 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi guys, I'm trying to convert an SDP body to Multipart/Mixed and add an ISUP encapsulated part (SIP-I) on a 200OK reply. It seems like the module is having trouble with the delimiters. The scenario is like this: PSTN MGC Kamailio SEMS |-------IAM------>| | | | |----INVITE/IAM/SDP---> | | | | | ---INVITE/IAM/SDP--> | | | | <------200OK/SDP---- | | |<-----200OK/ACM/SDP--- | | |<------ACM-------| | | This is the config I'm using (just showing the relevant part, let me know if you need the whole config file): onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY]{ if (status=~"200"){ xlog("L_INFO","Reply <$rs> Message Interception\n"); route(INSERT_ACM); } } route[INSERT_ACM]{ set_body_multipart(); $var(acm) = "06 02 04 01 29 01 01 00"; append_body_part("$var(acm)","application/isup; version=itu-t92+","signal; handling=optional"); return; } The original 200OK Message received is: #U 2015/02/20 11:40:38.687418 172.30.24.20:5080 -> 172.30.24.20:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.24.20;branch=z9hG4bK8a2b.41161a372680192aa4fdd9efbefd6696.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+1010ce54853b2a3c7f7b8a220b4b69a41+3a836f1f+1 Call-ID: 4C6CD8F8@3a836f1f From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e100002+ef7ba2f0 To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=3DF4D6A2-54E74766000A65EC-41B8C700 CSeq: 221937633 INVITE Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 224 v=0 o=sems 351367313 715465045 IN IP4 172.30.24.20 s=sems c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20 t=0 0 m=audio 10054 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=direction:both And the mangled 200OK message I generate with Kamailio to send Upstream with this configuration is: # U 2015/02/20 11:40:38.690733 172.30.24.20:5060 -> 172.30.8.66:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+1010ce54853b2a3c7f7b8a220b4b69a41+3a836f1f+1 Call-ID: 4C6CD8F8@3a836f1f From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e100002+ef7ba2f0 To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=3DF4D6A2-54E74766000A65EC-41B8C700 CSeq: 221937633 INVITE Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080> Content-Length: 301 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 --unique-boundary-1 Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=sems 351367313 715465045 IN IP4 172.30.24.20 s=sems c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20 t=0 0 m=audio 10054 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=direction:both --unique-boundary-1 As you can see, the TEXTOPS module is not adding the ISUP part, also the boundary of the SDP is missing the last "--" to indicate this is the last part. But it is indeed changing the Content-Type to multipart/mixed, although the boundary has a set of quotes that I'm not sure if could be the problem. On the logs I get: Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: INFO: Kamlog: Reply <200> Message Interception Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1582]: set_multibody_helper(): delimiter<17>:[unique-boundary-1] Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=225 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1491]: generate_boundary(): adding final CRLF+CRLF Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1719]: set_multibody_helper(): content-type<44>:[multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1"] Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1771]: set_multibody_helper(): set flag FL_BODY_MULTIPART ### Error ### Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: ERROR: textops [textops.c:1869]: append_multibody_helper(): Cannot get boundary. Is body multipart? ### ### Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=200 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:470]: clen_builder(): clen_builder: content-length: 302 (302) Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2278]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): old size: 804, new size: 844 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2296]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:804, new: 844, rest: 0 msg=#012SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+68a818f192518f00b46eeddb5c81dd791+3a836f1f+1#015#012Call-ID: CE965967@3a836f1f#015#012From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e090003+66eb0deb#015#012To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=21E58627-54E74A050009BACD-41C8D700#015#012CSeq: 525107355 INVITE#015#012Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux))#015#012Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080>#015#012Content-Length: 302#015#012Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1"#015#012Mime-Version: 1.0#015#012#015#012--unique-boundary-1#015#012Content-Type: application/sdp#015#012#015#012v=0#015#012o=sems 1379293612 709544991 IN IP4 172.30.24.20#015#012s=sems#015#012c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 10056 RTP/AVP 8 101#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-15#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=direction:both#015#012#015#012--unique-boundary-1#015#012 Could it be that those missing "--" after the unique-boundary-1 delimiter are the ones giving trouble? Or could it be those extra quotes on the Content-Type boundary? Any help would be appreciated, thanks!! Federico Federico San Martín e-mail : fsanmartin(a)telecentro.net.ar

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Regarding RTP in IMS Networks.
by Badri Ranganathan 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi all, I'll make this question a little clearer. User 1 ---------------- SBC ----+ other IMS network components ---------------------- User 2 Same scenario User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis If user 2, after answering the call, did not play RTP as well, the SBC will not forward the RTP from User 1 to User 2. [The media gateways responsible for the RTP traffic is also a part of the IMS network right?] So why this sort of bi-directional traffic imposition in an IMS Network ? Thanks, Badri. -----Original Message----- From: Badri Ranganathan Sent: 24 February 2015 15:13 To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Regarding RTP in IMS Networks. Hi all, I have a doubt w.r.t media traffic in IMS Networks. If I have a setting as follows - User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis I see that User 2 has to play RTP Traffic before it can start recording the RTP coming from user 1. i.e., User 2 Answering the call + (Play RTP Traffic ) + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis. Why am I seeing this behaviour. Is it just a setting in the IMS network that can be changed or is it a standard behaviour in IMS Networks ? If yes, then could anyone please let me know the logic behind such a decision? Please do let me know if you have any ideas. Any responses really appreciated ! Thanks, Badri.

2 1

Regarding RTP in IMS Networks.
by Badri Ranganathan 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi all, I have a doubt w.r.t media traffic in IMS Networks. If I have a setting as follows - User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis I see that User 2 has to play RTP Traffic before it can start recording the RTP coming from user 1. i.e., User 2 Answering the call + (Play RTP Traffic ) + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis. Why am I seeing this behaviour. Is it just a setting in the IMS network that can be changed or is it a standard behaviour in IMS Networks ? If yes, then could anyone please let me know the logic behind such a decision? Please do let me know if you have any ideas. Any responses really appreciated ! Thanks, Badri.

1 0

Drouting Question
by Andrew Okri 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi All, Does dropping set the $du or $ru uri when it finds a match in the database? I am getting destination not set error in my debug trace and he call request times out as a result. Regards Andrew Okri

1 0

kamailio crash
by kovarik＠odorik.cz 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hello, kamailio crash if receive this invite (full pcap in attach): INVITE sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 89.103.14.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bKader9m419p44oh1arfvg3q3;rport From: <sip:680114@sip.odorik.cz>;tag=n67dnvutedhc7h8g0723 To: <sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz> Contact: <sip:4WJEcOsCK95r_THu1yoG@89.103.14.100:5060;comp=sigcomp> Supported: 100rel,timer CSeq: 2374 INVITE Call-ID: PKnr_QhkoIfgFw74ch7P9QzSx4Utqm Allow: UPDATE,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,REFER,NOTIFY,INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,OPTIONS,BYE User-Agent: Nokia RM-469 091.003 (cs) Expires: 120 Privacy: None Session-Expires: 1800 Max-Forwards: 69 Proxy-Authorization: Digest realm="sip.odorik.cz",nonce="VOd181TndMfi5yGjm4maxIr8yb1s/ARs",algorithm=MD5,username="680114",uri="sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz",response="11aa17ebbf02d284c1fa5b03bca7fd89" Content-Type: application/sdp Accept-Language: cs Content-Length: 540 v=0 o=680114 63592714297343250 63592714297343250 IN IP4 89.103.14.100 s=- c=IN IP4 89.103.14.100 t=0 0 m=audio 49152 RTP/AVP 100 96 0 8 97 18 98 13 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:100 AMR-WB/16000 a=ptime:20 a=maxptime:200 a=fmtp:100 mode-change-period=2; mode-change-neighbor=1 a=rtpmap:96 AMR/8000 a=fmtp:96 mode-set=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7; mode-change-neighbor=1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:98 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:98 0-15 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 and in run im kamailio.cfg $var(codecs)="G729,PCMA,GSM,iLBC,speex,telephone-event"; sdp_keep_codecs_by_name($var(codecs)); Kamailio crash with gdb export crash_20.02.2015 in attachments. kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 9524b3-dirty flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 9524b3 -dirty compiled on 23:32:12 Feb 19 2015 with gcc 4.7.2 Thank you.

2 2

Best practices for unsetting PVs
by Alex Balashov 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hi, We have this approach for arrayable PVs (e.g. AVPs, XAVPs): $(avp(var)[*]) = $null; This defines the PV, but sets its value to null. I haven't tested, but I would assume, in the case of an AVP, that this would cause it to fail defined $avp(var) is_avp_set("$avp(var)") But, I see there is also in the 'pv' module now a function pv_unset(), i.e. pv_unset("$avp(var)"); pv_unset("$var(foo)"); I assume this actually deletes the variable itself from the namespace, instead of assigning it an undefined value. Are there pros and cons to using one or the other to mass-reset variables relevant to call processing at the beginning of route script? Thanks, -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Thank you for reply, On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured to 5061 http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ Here config file http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ Thank you, Slava. From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk We also need to check the core file from the crash. /O On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com > wrote: Hello, can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your config to me? As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); I will like to double check if the issue is still present. You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... Cheers, Daniel On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for asterisk servers. Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on private side UDP 5060. When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of kamailio. Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss configuration ? [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==12 && [ domain.org ] == [ 10.18.130.46 ] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==11 && [ domain.org ] == [67.34.12.56] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: [4130713.518667] kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 0000000 0004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007 fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13: 49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5St ringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(_sips._ tcp.networklab.ca (24), 33), h=646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._ tcp.domain.org , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding _sips._ tcp.domain.org (24) 33 (flags=0) at 646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding camsgsrv02.domain.org (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find( camsgsrv02.domain.org (24), 1), h=967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 10.18.130.50 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, type 3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 :5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 10.18.130.46 , using default... Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSc<default> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed Thank you Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

3 3

Dispatcher: Check uri string in Kamailio 3.3
by Jon Bonilla (Manwe) 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

Hi all I need to check a given uri against dispatcher destination entries. I see that it's possible in kamailio 4.2 using ds_is_from_list which allows "uri" parameter but it's not available in version 3.3. Moving to 4.x is not an option this time. Any hints about how to check this? Raw sql + string comparation or something more elegant out there? thanks, Jon

2 1

NAT SIPPING in a FreeBSD jail
by Euan Thoms 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

I've been running Kamailio 4.2.2/4.2.3 in a FreeBSD 10.1 jail for a few weeks, thanks to a recent port in the FreeBSD ports tree. However, it has been a bit unstable. It crashes randomly. It's hard to debug since it can go three days without crashing, and there is no obvious trigger. I'm also running 4.1.0 on FreeBSD 8.3, compiled from source manually. It is rock solid for a long time now. So, I have 2 theories: 1) My FreeBSd ports patch for ip_addr.h is wrong. I was having to define INADDR_LOOPBACK since compile would fail with 'undeclared identifier'. My patch was to define INADDR_LOOPBACK in ip_addr.h as a 'long' as such: #define INADDR_LOOPBACK (long) 0x7F000001 However, it appears this should have been: #define INADDR_LOOPBACK (unsigned long) 0x7F000001 The previous patch seemed to work, but could have caused the crashes I'm seeing. 2.) The NAT SIPPing feature defined with WITH_NATSIPPING is a new feature since 4.1.0. So my 4.1.0 installation does not use it. Now that I am using it on 4.2.3, I am getting this random crash. I suspect that the feature uses an ICMP ping at some stage. In FreeBSD jails, by default ping is not allowed (security feature). If you really need to ping then you need to explicitly allow raw sockets. So perhaps Kamailio doesn't know how to handle the "operation not permitted" and crashes. I am going to test without NAT SIPping and see if it crashes. Although it's hard to test, since I have no trigger and it can be days between crashes. ** My question is: how do I force the ping behaviour in NAT SIPping feature? I need a trigger to further debug. Output from /var/log/messages after crash: Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52610]: CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: receive_fd(): EOF on 24 Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52578]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:784]: handle_sigs(): child process 52606 exited by a signal 6 Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52578]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:787]: handle_sigs(): core was generated

2 1

Re-invites from carrier breaks the call
by Will Ferrer 21 Feb '15

21 Feb '15

Hi All We have any issue with re invites coming from the carrier. When a reinvite occurs, our softphone client gets the invite, sends a 100, and then sends 200 ok. However the 200 ok does not have the softphones ip in the record route. Since it's not in the record route the ack from the carrier never makes it's way all the back to the softphone. This causes the softphone to keep sending 200 oks since it never gets the ack. Eventually the softphone gets tired of sending 200 oks and sends a bye. Is there any way that Kamailio can help me correct for this, or do we need to have our clients use different softphones? If it has to be handled via softphones is there even a softphone that can account for this? Thanks for all your assistance in advance. All the best. Will Ferrer Switchsoft

10 29

xhttp module and IPv6
by Sergey Okhapkin 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

It looks like when http request comes from ipv6 address, the module inserts Via header without [] around the address: Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2193]: parse_via(): ERROR:parse_via: bad port Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2708]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via on: <SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3:8840:A:172E:9CAD:6BB2:3F69:45306 Host: sip1.callwithus.com:5060 Connection: Upgrade Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache Upgrade: websocket Origin: http://www.callwithus.com Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.93 Safari/537.36 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, sdch Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Sec-WebSocket-Key: nyAUyArASVRXTI+Nvx82/Q== Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate; client_max_window_bits Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip > Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2712]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via parse error, parsed so far:<SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3> Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:125]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad via Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: INFO: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header field [Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 260] Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<GET / HTTP/1.1 *Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3:8840:A:172E:9CAD:6BB2:3F69:45306* Host: sip1.callwithus.com:5060 Connection: Upgrade Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache Upgrade: websocket Origin: http://www.callwithus.com Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.93 Safari/537.36 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, sdch Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Sec-WebSocket-Key: nyAUyArASVRXTI+Nvx82/Q== Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate; client_max_window_bits Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip > Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: xhttp [xhttp_mod.c:264]: xhttp_process_request(): parse_msg failed

2 4

CNXCC Max Call control on Version 4.1.4
by Jonathan Hunter 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

Hi Guys, Using kamailio Version 4.1.4 on Centos 6.5 I have an issue when using cnxcc to control max call duration for all outbound calls. In my configuration I set the following; # -----Dialog params -----modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4)modparam("cnxcc", "dlg_flag", 4)modparam("cnxcc", "credit_check_period", 1) Then I look to set some parameters for outbound calls; ###########Set Max Call Duration for MT Call ############# $var(customer) = "MTPublic";$var(max_time) = $var(MTMaxCallDuration);xlog("L_INFO","For setting Call Duration we have ProfileID=$var(profileIDMD) and we have var(max_time)=$var(max_time)\n");cnxcc_set_max_time("$var(customer)", "$var(max_time)");xlog("L_INFO","Max Call duration set to $var(max_time) seconds\n"); Feb 20 14:20:26 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1950]: INFO: <script>: Max Call duration set to 600 secondsFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: ALERT: cnxcc [cnxcc_check.c:157]: check_calls_by_time(): [74d7c02e-33ae-1233-edba-005056a48754] call has exhausted its time. Breaking the loopFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: INFO: <script>: [74d7c02e-33ae-1233-edba-005056a48754]: call killed as Max Call Duration ExpiredFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: ERROR: cnxcc [cnxcc_mod.c:1068]: terminate_call(): Error executing dlg_end_dlg command. Return code was [404] Now as you can see, as soon as the Called party answers, the cnxcc module drops the call stating that Max Call duration has expired, however it was set to 600 seconds. If I restart kamailio this clears the issue and it works fine allowing calls to run up to 600 seconds. Any help/comment on this would be great, is it just configuration related? Thanks Jon

2 6

Kamailio
by Tomasz Gass 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Good morning, I'm looking for someone who, according to my guidelines set kamailio and connect the asterisk. Kamailio to act as a proxy server to accept registrations sip and locate. Pay for the correct configuration. Please contact me with people interested. Regards Tom

2 1

kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for asterisk servers. Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on private side UDP 5060. When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of kamailio. Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss configuration ? [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org] == [ 10.18.130.46 ] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org] == [67.34.12.56] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: [4130713.518667] kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 0000000 0004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007 fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13: 49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5St ringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca(24), 33), h=646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding _sips._tcp.domain.org(24) 33 (flags=0) at 646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding camsgsrv02.domain.org(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org(24), 1), h=967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 10.18.130.50 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, type 3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 :5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 10.18.130.46 , using default... Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSc<default> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed Thank you Slava.

3 2

acc db_extra problem
by Uri Shacked 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hi, It is my second time upgrading kamailio to 4.2.X. Everything is working except the acc db_extra inserts. I keep on getting that error: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Incorrect integer value: '' for column XXXXXXX I must confess, I managed to solve the problem once. But I do not remember how :-(. The XXXXXX column is set as an integer with NULL enabled and no default value (which works on the kamailio server where i fixed it...) Any ideas of where it comes from? BR, Uri

2 2

Kamailio Debug
by keita Adoulaye 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hi friends, Having problems with this command: tail -f /var/log/kamailio.log That it’s what i got: ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:382]: mod_destroy(): ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) Any ideas will appreciated Thanks

3 2

ims_charging module - AVP's
by Shane Harrison 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Hi IMS'ers I am generating CCR's happily from the ims_charging module (adapted to work standalone with standard userloc module) but have a couple of questions around AVP's supported. a) I note that in the 3GPP TS 32.299 V12.7.0 specification that table 7.1.0.1, that it indicates Vendor-Id and Vendor-Specific-Application-Id aren't used. But later in section 7.1.16 it indicates that the Vendor-Id should be 10415 and set inside the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id AVP. Should I assume that the table is wrong ? b) The ims_charging_module doesn't seem to put an Auth-Application-Id into the CCR. This is mandatory according to 3GPP and RFC4006. I note that it does appear under the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id - but this doesn't seem right to me? At this stage I am thinking to add the Auth-Application-Id AVP and also the 3GPP Called-Party-Address AVP. To I submit patches to the development list? Kind regards Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

3 2

Credit Control modules
by Shane Harrison 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Hi all, As you will have seen from my posts, I have adapted the ims_charging module to work with usrloc module i.e. outside ims environment. I am interested in whether others see a use in having a Diameter Credit Control module that is standalone. There are already a number of Credit Control modules other than the ims one e.g. cncxx and I am not sure if the community sees a need for YACC. If there is interest then need to consider further how best to approach accommodating both ims dependence and standalone operation. Cheers Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

2 1

rtpproxy bridge "ie" "ei" behind NAT (like in aws EC2)
by Giovanni Maruzzelli 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

dear Kamailians, I have Kamailio+rtpproxy in front of FreeSWITCH. Kamailio and FreeSWITCH are on the same private network. Public Internet IP address ports are redirected to Kamailio and rtpproxy (same situation as in Amazon EC2). Clients comes from Internet, and make calls to Internet, SIP signaling passing through FreeSWITCH (eg: A leg incoming INVITE, FreeSWITCH originate an outbound B leg INVITE, and then bridge the legs). Using rtpproxy with -A "advertise" patch from Daniel, this topology works fine in a "traditional" telco way: rtp goes from caller to rtpproxy to callee, and viceversa. Now I want to maintain FreeSWITCH in the middle of rtp flow all the time, in a pure b2bua way, so it can control and analyze the media streams. So, I need rtpproxy to act paying attention to direction, as in caller->rtpproxy->freeswitch->rtpproxy->callee (and viceversa). Normally I would use Kamailio multihomed and rtpproxy in bridging mode. But I cannot have a NIC on the public address. How I can use the "ie" "ei" feature of rtpproxy in an Amazon-EC2 like environment? (eg: no public address attached to machine, but ports redirection from public address). I read this trick from Hugh Waite: "I have used rtpproxy (with the advertised address patch) in Amazon to bridge media between internet facing and private subnets in a VPC. I found that I couldn’t use different advertised addresses depending on which direction the signalling was going on a single private IP address. I worked around this by allocating a second private ip address to the instance and used that in the ‘bridge’. -A 54.86.X.X/10.0.1.15 –l 10.0.1.10/10.0.1.15" Can you explain how to use this trick, or another way (without additional addresses is gladly accepted!) to reach the same result (rtp always passing through FreeSWITCH) ? Thank you all in advance, -giovanni -- Sincerely, Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618

8 11

Session timers
by Eric Koome 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

How do I process session timers in Kamailio coming from particular upstream provider every 15mins during a call? At the moment the the call fails after 15 mins. Related to this, another provider sends re-invites during a dialog to check that my kamailio is alive. However Kamailio responds with "488 not here". How do I process these as well? Asterisk sits behind Kamailio. Thanks Eric

2 3

CAMARILLO : (9898) ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:382]: mod_destroy(): ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1)
by BY - Boujraf Youssef 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Dear all, We get this error message : Using Kamailio V4.2 debian wheezy (9898) ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:382]: mod_destroy(): ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) We are not able to fix it. If anybody could help us it will be great. Best Regards, Youssef

1 0

load balancing + rtpengine
by Virmantas Variakojis 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Hi, I want to use load balancing (dispatcher or carrierroute) but i have two upstream interfaces (separate vlan's to provider sides) and third interface to SIP clients side. Also i need to rewrite sdp fields with correct information with rtpengine, but it's impossible as i don't know whitch direction (provider) will be chosen by algorithm. Is it possible to use load dispatcher or carrierroute in conjunction with rtpengine or load balancing must be done manualy? — Regards, Virmantas -- __________________________________________________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in the present message (including any information contained in attachments herein) may be confidential and privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error please contact the sender (by return e-mail) immediately and delete this message. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in parts is strictly prohibited. Print this message only if sharp necessary. УВЕДОМЛЕНИЕ О КОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТИ: Информация, содержащаяся в настоящем сообщении (включая любое вложение) может быть конфиденциальной и охраняться действующим законодательством. Сообщение может быть прочитано, скопировано и использовано исключительно лицом, которому сообщение предназначается. Если Вы получили настоящее сообщение по ошибке, пожалуйста, незамедлительно сообщите об этом отправителю (ответным письмом по электронной почте). Любое несанкционированное использование или распространение информации, содержащейся в настоящем сообщении в целом или в части, строго запрещены. Не распечатывайте настоящее сообщение, если в этом нет крайней необходимости.

1 0

TLS certificates per domain
by Muhammad Shahzad 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Hi, I want to deploy a kamailio v4.2.x setup with multiple domains, all resolve to same IPv4 address kamailio is listening on. I am bit confused about how to configure TLS certificates using tls config file as mentioned here, http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/tls.html#tls.p.config The documentation states that, -- If set the TLS module will load a special config file or config files from config directory, in which different TLS parameters can be specified on a per role (server or client) and domain basis (*for now only IPs*). The corresponding module parameters will be ignored. -- since all domains resolve single IP, so i assume i can specify only one section in tls config file with pair of key/pem file path. How can i specify more server certificates for same ip but with different domains? Thank you.

2 2

Syntax issue?
by Igor Potjevlesch 17 Feb '15

17 Feb '15

Hello, I'm looking for a way to track a call by using basic AVP like this: Into a route that treats INVITE: $avp(s:state)="call_start"; Then, if I test this AVP into WITHINDLG route: if($avp(s:state)!="call_start") ; the test fails. Did I miss something? The goal is to update this AVP during the life of the transaction. Regards, Igor.

4 15

selective logging with debugger module
by Sharath Kumar 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hello, I followed the documentation from http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/debugger.html#idp84752. I have the global debug flag at 9. modparam("debugger", "cfgtrace", 1) modparam("debugger", "mod_level_mode", 1) modparam("debugger", "mod_level", "core=3") My Kamailio complains with a parsing error of some sort and fails to start. - "dbg_mod_level_param(): cannot store parameter: core=3" My intention is to turn off/reduce the "core" module tracing while keeping the "script" module at debug. Any suggestions ? I am running version 4.1.4. thanks Sharath

1 0

Amazon VPS, long UDP packets are seen by sniffer, but don't reach application
by Andrey Utkin 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

We experience strange networking issue, not exactly specific to kamailio, but still related to it. Rtpengine's "ng" interface uses UDP. Protocol messages contains SDP, and for encrypted video call those messages exceed 1500 bytes. Everything works fine within localhost, but when rtpengine and Kamailio are on different hosts, and when hosts are Amazon-hosted, we have trouble. This is experienced with l3.large, t2.micro with Ubuntu 14. I believe we don't have any special settings over system defaults. We send a large datagram from remote host, e.g. with such trivial app in python: import socket UDP_IP = "123.123.123.123" # remote host IP UDP_PORT = 33333 MESSAGE = """ .....0010......0020......0030......0040......0050......0060......0070......0080......0090......0100 .....0110......0120......0130......0140......0150......0160......0170......0180......0190......0200 .....0210......0220......0230......0240......0250......0260......0270......0280......0290......0300 .....0310......0320......0330......0340......0350......0360......0370......0380......0390......0400 .....0410......0420......0430......0440......0450......0460......0470......0480......0490......0500 .....0510......0520......0530......0540......0550......0560......0570......0580......0590......0600 .....0610......0620......0630......0640......0650......0660......0670......0680......0690......0700 .....0710......0720......0730......0740......0750......0760......0770......0780......0790......0800 .....0810......0820......0830......0840......0850......0860......0870......0880......0890......0900 .....0910......0920......0930......0940......0950......0960......0970......0980......0990......1000 .....1010......1020......1030......1040......1050......1060......1070......1080......1090......1100 .....1110......1120......1130......1140......1150......1160......1170......1180......1190......1200 .....1210......1220......1230......1240......1250......1260......1270......1280......1290......1300 .....1310......1320......1330......1340......1350......1360......1370......1380......1390......1400 .....1410......1420......1430......1440......1450......1460......1470......1480......1490......1500 .....1510......1520......1530......1540......1550......1560......1570......1580......1590......1600 .....1610......1620......1630......1640......1650......1660......1670......1680......1690......1700 .....1710......1720......1730......1740......1750......1760......1770......1780......1790......1800 .....1810......1820......1830......1840......1850......1860......1870......1880......1890......1900 .....1910......1920......1930......1940......1950......1960......1970......1980......1990......2000""" print "UDP target IP:", UDP_IP print "UDP target port:", UDP_PORT print "message:", MESSAGE sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) sock.sendto(MESSAGE, (UDP_IP, UDP_PORT)) Then we listen on that port with such trivial python app: import socket UDP_IP = "172.31.4.102" # local ip UDP_PORT = 33333 sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) sock.bind((UDP_IP, UDP_PORT)) while True: data, addr = sock.recvfrom(0x10000) print "received message:", data Meanwhile, we monitor the traffic with e.g. ngrep: ngrep -t -e -d any -W byline -O large_udp.pcap port 33333 or '(ip[6:2]' '&' '0x1fff)' '!=' '0' (the part after "or" catches segments of segmented packets) About the host: # uname -a Linux hostname 3.16.0-30-generic #40~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 15 17:43:14 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Also linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic and linux-image-3.13.0-45-generic behave in same way. What we see: - ngrep shows the packets with correct contents. All segments are delivered. - application doesn't get any data at all Rarely dmesg shows such messages: [ 102.161679] UDP: bad checksum. From 123.123.123.124:56439 to 172.31.4.102:33333 ulen 2008 but it is logged really rarely, so this is surely not what happens on every packet transmission. This test works fine on e.g. cheapest DigitalOcean VPS. I am concerned with this issue because rtpengine software has UDP interface. So on Amazon hosts this interface works only within localhost, and I cannot distribute software to different nodes. Any thoughts? What's wrong, how to fix? -- Andrey Utkin

2 4

Log Media IP
by Ryan Brindley 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hey community, What's the best way to pull out the media ip from the SIP INVITE body (for logging)? Ryan Brindley

2 1

Event reg - questions
by Stefan Ljung 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

I made a test configuration for trying the pua_regEvent module. There were two things I want to ask about. First - when the SUBSCRIBE to event 'reg' following a UEs registration to the Kamailio is responded with a NOTIFY - there was no body in the NOTIFY. I expected a XML body with registration status. Second - When the UE re-registers to Kamailio - I expected a NOTIFY to be send on the existing 'reg' subscription, but nothing happened. Or am I missing some configuration ? Here's some of the conf script: ####### Modules Section ######## loadmodule "db_mysql.so" loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" loadmodule "xcap_client.so" loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_reginfo.so" loadmodule "presence.so" loadmodule "presence_reginfo.so" loadmodule "presence_xml.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- #!define DBURL "mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@localhost/kamailio" # ----- xlog params ----- modparam("xlog", "prefix", "-xlog: ") # ----- mi_fifo params ----- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") # ----- tm params ----- # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) # default retransmission timeout: 30sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) # default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 120sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 120000) # ----- rr params ----- # add value to ;lr param to cope with most of the UAs modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # do not append from tag to the RR (no need for this script) modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 0) # ----- registrar params ----- modparam("registrar", "method_filtering", 1) modparam("registrar", "max_expires", 86400) # ----- pua_reginfo params ----- modparam("pua_reginfo", "default_domain", "system.test") modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:reginfo@10.171.0.4") modparam("pua_reginfo", "publish_reginfo", 0) modparam("pua_reginfo", "default_domain", "system.test") # ----- presence_xml params ----- modparam("presence_xml", "integrated_xcap_server", 1) # ----- presence params ----- modparam("presence", "db_url", DBURL)

2 1

dialog module 4.2 REFER
by Uri Shacked 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hi, I am trying to use dlg_refer. I set the side to refer and the final destination. But, the contact header of the refer stays "controler(a)kamailio.org". So, the refer fails. Is it a bug or should i change the contact header by myself before doing the dlg_refer? same with the dlg_bridge..... Cheers, Uri

3 2

Using dialog_ng
by Shane Harrison 15 Feb '15

15 Feb '15

Hi all, I think the lack of response to my previous thread is probably because it was too complicated. I have now narrowed my problem down after further archive readings . I am trying to use the dialog_ng module along with the ims_charging_module. Upon reception of an INVITE, a call to the Ro_CCR() from the request_route script is made. That function does a check that the dialog record exists (binds to dialog module and does a "get_dlg(msg)" call) - this fails i.e. dialog is not found. Running kamailio 4.2.2 and relevant sections of kamailio.cfg are: modparam("dialog_ng", "dlg_flag", FLT_DIALOG) modparam("dialog_ng", "timeout_avp", "$avp(DLG_TIMEOUT_AVP)") modparam("dialog_ng", "detect_spirals", 1) modparam("dialog_ng", "profiles_no_value", "orig ; term") request_route { # NAT detection route(NATDETECT); # Set DLG flag to track dialogs using dialog2 if (!is_method("REGISTER|SUBSCRIBE")) setflag(FLT_DIALOG); # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); ### only initial requests (no To tag) # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) t_relay(); exit; } t_check_trans(); if (is_method("INVITE")) { set_dlg_profile("orig"); Ro_CCR("CHARGING_CCR_REPLY", "orig", "SCUR", "", "30","CCR_location"); } So my question is, "should the above logic create a dialog record on the initial INVITE?" and if yes then "what possible reasons might there be for the Ro_CCR() function not be able to detect it exists?" Cheers Shane Harrison

3 7

rtpengine - Error when sending message. Error: Invalid argument
by Amit Patkar 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

Hi I am getting error with rtpengine. Running Kamailio 4.2.3 I am trying to call from conventional SIP client to WebRTC client Google Chrome v38.0.2125.104 Firefox v33.0 Using sipML5 as WebRTC client root@rtcpbx:/home/avhan# /usr/sbin/rtpengine --interface=127.0.0.1\!192.168.2.161 --listen-ng=7722 --pidfile=/var/run/ngcp-rtpengine-daemon.pid --tos=184 --table=42 --foreground --log-level=7 --log-stderr INFO: Generating new DTLS certificate DEBUG: Dump of DTLS certificate: DEBUG: --- -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- DEBUG: --- MIIBpDCCAQ2gAwIBAAIJAIH/X+7BeV8gMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMBQxEjAQBgNV DEBUG: --- BAMTCXJ0cGVuZ2luZTAeFw0xNTAyMTMxMjM5MjJaFw0xNTAzMTYxMjM5MjJaMBQx DEBUG: --- EjAQBgNVBAMTCXJ0cGVuZ2luZTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA DEBUG: --- tfOduffYlJeuTeA6GRRKpeuUougYgu33QKjPZ9RuQNl6AIsmJQrqPJ9bTv93BlNd DEBUG: --- I/COq89SRxxjhAHEw6v3F283/lZAitySVa+TazbpZrwKsWbfPTXtLMC5oJvEPUr/ DEBUG: --- 8xcX+rnImLHZPrECMZj4pjSI6htclKok+YFf3incSmECAwEAATANBgkqhkiG9w0B DEBUG: --- AQUFAAOBgQBA2zHxUAv4J/dRLMboF9y3h6hQNnoEQNDwlmE+M4bBbOAxNYNxpmy3 DEBUG: --- mmZ54GBZFbvIWO4MVYrGiEMXBsQ3LSHo+MeExtY7Jq1RbXHU+DT/hHg5DGHHeFyr DEBUG: --- d46TUaHIFG/XhKSAaaCX1EbqtezMaUWrJw+mtOfzfZMEVzMP72CmiA== DEBUG: --- -----END CERTIFICATE----- DEBUG: Dump of DTLS private key: DEBUG: --- -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- DEBUG: --- MIICdgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAmAwggJcAgEAAoGBALXznbn32JSXrk3g DEBUG: --- OhkUSqXrlKLoGILt90Coz2fUbkDZegCLJiUK6jyfW07/dwZTXSPwjqvPUkccY4QB DEBUG: --- xMOr9xdvN/5WQIrcklWvk2s26Wa8CrFm3z017SzAuaCbxD1K//MXF/q5yJix2T6x DEBUG: --- AjGY+KY0iOobXJSqJPmBX94p3EphAgMBAAECgYBJG9sLZz/Z7Nx3pBoUC6g25OKz DEBUG: --- VmjK6w0HKQ01XhDy869m2oJ4LduSgkFxC4rqusJY94aMGGCp/AkseH10VfuQ/Dn4 DEBUG: --- 6Zv9l8xGlprRmW0do6w0AR7F5JpcuoMT7ae8Jf7hAJpa//LbAg2s0lJBMofIUtd/ DEBUG: --- 0xs0y9uX/stV9hRAAQJBAOUocKdTbN1J9W6EB+r64/QBPxB7jhbs8J76RRfCjhE2 DEBUG: --- CS8JRBajMJJ3XgjOWQuh44xmydGCJeSSisDKsONVpgECQQDLQ6QCHYJxeXJ0R4w9 DEBUG: --- 5XqUEQhb03GlwoTIas3YQfJJyk/zKnQAkBKwjwatrNEldCGBOCOgeQhTERPwSxcx DEBUG: --- kGRhAkBxjmSkxjaAQhIZPdwemU00sRlrNY7n1Wo3nZV3fLWh2cEbSeAvx5ZePkCe DEBUG: --- 5IJDvWlhPd5sr63PYr7XYpndTagBAkEAj27Nvwhf0f8nOtJ6LftPAkj6owGUAqo+ DEBUG: --- 1MY5N09hz5xJyoe8j+EaryheSBPZChrmwa6BxW1i6Gr2rOvwE/OWQQJACxjVriL8 DEBUG: --- mKFqDLN1rQuDqyA6f0jSaxuPsA3TGCcEbgw4e8hQD9pFJ6NK7/X/UeqqWsW0sAZS DEBUG: --- mNrnLY9VvZPSpw== DEBUG: --- -----END PRIVATE KEY----- INFO: Startup complete, version 3.3.0.0+0~mr3.8.0.0 DEBUG: Adding a proxy for control ng stats:127.0.0.1 INFO: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:60075: offer - { "sdp": "v=0 o=- 28314700 28314700 IN IP4 192.168.2.18 s=http://www.portsip.com c=IN IP4 192.168.2.18 t=0 0 m=audio 20670 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv ", "ICE": "force", "flags": [ "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..", "received-from": [ "IP4", "192.168.2.18" ], "from-tag": "7a3b9012", "command": "offer" } NOTICE: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Creating new call DEBUG: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Opened ports 30000..30001 for media relay DEBUG: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Opened ports 30010..30011 for media relay INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp669:v=0 o=- 28314700 28314700 IN IP4 192.168.2.161 s=http://www.portsip.com c=IN IP4 192.168.2.161 t=0 0 a=ice-lite m=audio 30000 RTP/SAVPF 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30001 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:JBeKZmgOzhC3A5Ays2nm4Jx3GqSbsoVStGSjSFL/ a=setup:actpass a=fingerprint:sha-1 CE:47:48:60:04:D0:A5:D7:FD:00:89:6E:8F:D9:25:48:9D:2F:B9:89 a=ice-ufrag:bMtYwXGC a=ice-pwd:q053zJtRE8bxgCEu3eebdaqoWSmr a=candidate:EqkUFjVat8drCK70 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.2.161 30000 typ host a=candidate:EqkUFjVat8drCK70 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.2.161 30001 typ host 6:result2:oke INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7427 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30000] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7428 INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw.. port 30001] STUN: using this candidate INFO: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:42832: ping - { "command": "ping" } INFO: Returning to SIP proxy: d6:result4:ponge INFO: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:35595: offer - { "sdp": "v=0 o=- 28373892 28373892 IN IP4 192.168.2.18 s=http://www.portsip.com c=IN IP4 192.168.2.18 t=0 0 m=audio 20674 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv ", "ICE": "force", "flags": [ "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..", "received-from": [ "IP4", "192.168.2.18" ], "from-tag": "bd78da3f", "command": "offer" } NOTICE: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..] Creating new call DEBUG: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..] Opened ports 30022..30023 for media relay DEBUG: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..] Opened ports 30044..30045 for media relay INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp669:v=0 o=- 28373892 28373892 IN IP4 192.168.2.161 s=http://www.portsip.com c=IN IP4 192.168.2.161 t=0 0 a=ice-lite m=audio 30022 RTP/SAVPF 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30023 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:YUVDWqqE+RNOPLu4d1J81/gee3OY8tnfGSjc2zjB a=setup:actpass a=fingerprint:sha-1 CE:47:48:60:04:D0:A5:D7:FD:00:89:6E:8F:D9:25:48:9D:2F:B9:89 a=ice-ufrag:1d16gzNH a=ice-pwd:qpNBX4eBwfNKq0TPpNHLeuMdHOjX a=candidate:EqkUFjVat8drCK70 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.2.161 30022 typ host a=candidate:EqkUFjVat8drCK70 2 UDP 2130706430 192.168.2.161 30023 typ host 6:result2:oke INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Closing call due to timeout INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] Final packet stats: INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] --- Tag '', created 1:06 ago, in dialogue with '(none)' INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] ------ Media #1, port 30000 <> [::]:0 , 6 p, 600 b, 0 e, 1423917572 last_packet INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] ------ Media #1, port 30001 <> [::]:0 (RTCP), 6 p, 600 b, 0 e, 1423917572 last_packet INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] --- Tag '7a3b9012', created 1:06 ago, in dialogue with '' INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] ------ Media #1, port 30010 <> 192.168.2.18:20670, 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 1423917566 last_packet INFO: [FjDYirMD4b8ldLCQFrUMaw..] ------ Media #1, port 30011 <> 192.168.2.18:20671 (RTCP), 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 1423917566 last_packet INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7449 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30022] STUN: using this candidate INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] Successful STUN binding request from 192.168.2.18:7450 INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30023] STUN: using this candidate INFO: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:36029: answer - { "sdp": "v=0 o=Mozilla-SIPUA-33.0 15128 1 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 s=Doubango Telecom - firefox t=0 0 a=ice-ufrag:524a14d8 a=ice-pwd:f23ceb82b6f9a86a2c1f180a013a9ff3 a=fingerprint:sha-256 6A:5D:49:F6:7B:FE:5B:5E:23:43:EE:31:43:20:46:C0:E8:12:B7:AD:AB:A2:09:66:94:55:42:E2:6B:D3:D9:63 m=audio 7449 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 0 101 c=IN IP4 192.168.2.18 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=setup:active a=candidate:0 1 UDP 2128609535 192.168.2.18 7449 typ host a=candidate:0 2 UDP 2128609534 192.168.2.18 7450 typ host ", "ICE": "remove", "flags": [ "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/AVP", "call-id": "fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..", "received-from": [ "IP4", "192.168.2.18" ], "from-tag": "bd78da3f", "to-tag": "mUTC7w3qs5ka6fJWKCiM", "command": "answer" } INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA..] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp240:v=0 o=Mozilla-SIPUA-33.0 15128 1 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 s=Doubango Telecom - firefox t=0 0 m=audio 30044 RTP/AVP 0 101 c=IN IP4 192.168.2.161 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:30045 6:result2:oke *DEBUG: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] Error when sending message. Error: Invalid argument WARNING: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] Write error on RTP socket: Invalid argument* INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] Final packet stats: INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] --- Tag 'mUTC7w3qs5ka6fJWKCiM', created 0:13 ago, in dialogue with 'bd78da3f' INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] ------ Media #1, port 30022 <> 192.168.2.18:7449 , 7 p, 700 b, 0 e, 1423917638 last_packet INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] ------ Media #1, port 30023 <> 192.168.2.18:7450 (RTCP), 7 p, 700 b, 0 e, 1423917638 last_packet INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] --- Tag 'bd78da3f', created 0:13 ago, in dialogue with 'mUTC7w3qs5ka6fJWKCiM' INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] ------ Media #1, port 30044 <> 192.168.2.18:20674, 0 p, 0 b, 1 e, 1423917626 last_packet INFO: [fJTfptxXKrVoGdalt_2MMA.. port 30044] ------ Media #1, port 30045 <> 192.168.2.18:20675 (RTCP), 0 p, 0 b, 0 e, 1423917626 last_packet Regards Amit

2 2

Kamailio and rtpengine
by Marc Soda 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

How does Kamailio load balance traffic to rtpengine? Is it load based, round robin, etc? The module makes mention of this but I don't see how it works. Also, it talks about weighting the proxies. How is that accomplished? Thanks, Marc

3 2

WebRTC to PSTN call, proxied through Kamailio
by Rahul MathuR 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

Hello gents, I was trying my hands on getting a successful RTCweb call (JSsip, since Peter Dunkley mentioned that he's been using JSsip for most of the testing scenarios..) to PSTN, making my kamailio as proxy + protocol converter (sip over web-sockets to sip over udp). And yes, I've referred Carlos' config; the main problem is I get 'Bad Media Description' error in Google Chromium (Version 40.0.2214.111 m) & my SIP server even sends 200 OK, but my phone doesn't ring. To make it worse, I can see rtpengine throwing this error - "SRTCP output wanted, but no crypto suite was negotiated" BTW, I have - [root@localhost log]# openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014 I even tried building kamailio & rtpengine using this openssl but in-vain. One thing that baffles me is that, apparently kamailio has started receiving RTP packets (perhaps early media) but the mobile phone hasn't ringed :-( I am attaching all possible logs & seek some guidance from the array of experts in this list. Files attached: a) tcpdump on ext. interface b) tcpdump on loopback c) syslogs d) Chromium JS logs UAC (14.98.55.38), Kamailio (125.99.186.126), SIP Server (157.238.178.153), Media Server (199.27.244.6) -- Warm Regds. MathuRahul

3 6

Issues after Ubuntu Server Update and WebRTC
by Manuel Camargo Lominchar 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

>* Is the SIP signaling still going fine via websocket? Do you get callee *>* ringing? *>>* Cheers, *>* Daniel* Hello Daniel Actually SIP signalling goes perfect, and i can see in RTP asterisk log that RTP packets are being sent, so I suppose there is something stuck somewhere in RTP maybe related with RTP Engine >Hi, > >If you are using rtpengine for the rtp you might have to upgrade to a >newer version. > >On my system crypto negotiation in rtpengine started failing after a >openssl update in January. Recompiling a newer version from git fixed that. > >regards > >M I updated to latest version through git but still stuck there. Now I can see that the config file (ngcp-rtpengine in etc default) has changed so I'm not sure how should this impact (not ADDRESS neither ADV ADDRESS now I see an Interfaces parameter) I also find for some reason very possible that somehow rtp traffic is not getting through. ICE candidates are being negotiated, so I feel that the route is clear, so maybe there might be some crypto issues as you point out, but update has not been enough :( Any other ideas? *Manuel Camargo* Teléfono: 638000836 eMail: sir.louen(a)gmail.com <https://twitter.com/SirLouen> [image: Ver el perfil de Manuel Camargo Lominchar en LinkedIn] <http://es.linkedin.com/in/louen>

1 1

change_reply_status() 415 -> 200 change
by Juha Heinanen 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

i tried to use change_reply_status() to change 415 to 200, but got: ERROR: textopsx [textopsx.c:283]: change_reply_status_f(): ERROR: textops: the class of provisional or positive final replies cannot be changed textopsx/README does not mention anything about what can or cannot be changed. why is it that the above change cannot be made? -- juha

2 1

Issues after Ubuntu Server Update and WebRTC
by Manuel Camargo Lominchar 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

This might be a weird question I've been operating for some months with my kam + asterisk + webrtc sipml5 based system inside an Ubuntu Server Today I had the idea to apt-get upgrade my system and... now the whole system webrtc communication service is dead Here is the VAST list of packages updated... But I cannot figure out who is the "destroyer" package. No prompts appeared during the update so I believe no config files have been updated I'm trying to debug but I cant find a solution The handshake is done, and in Wireshark the only thing I find is that no UDP (RTP) packages are being processed, but in the SIP log I can see ICE candidates and all process is done I tried to do a direct SIP connection without WebRTC, and it worked pretty fine, so this have something to do with maybe crypt libs, or something to do with kamailio and imcompatibilities with one of this packages. Kamailio Version: # kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.1.5 (x86_64/linux) 2b3d4b flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 2b3d4b compiled on 14:39:42 Aug 28 2014 with gcc 4.8.2 Any ideas of where to start digging? Start-Date: 2015-02-12 14:40:19 Install: linux-image-extra-3.13.0-45-generic:amd64 (3.13.0-45.74, automatic), linux-image-3.13.0-45-generic:amd64 (3.13.0-45.74, automatic), linux-headers-3.13.0-45-generic:amd64 (3.13.0-45.74, automatic), linux-headers-3.13.0-45:amd64 (3.13.0-45.74, automatic) Upgrade: bind9-host:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), python3-problem-report:amd64 (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5, 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6), mime-support:amd64 (3.54ubuntu1, 3.54ubuntu1.1), liblwres90:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), apt:amd64 (1.0.1ubuntu2.5, 1.0.1ubuntu2.6), libevent-2.0-5:amd64 (2.0.21-stable-1ubuntu1, 2.0.21-stable-1ubuntu1.14.04.1), libsystemd-login0:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), linux-headers-generic:amd64 (3.13.0.37.44, 3.13.0.45.52), mysql-server-core-5.5:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), ppp:amd64 (2.4.5-5.1ubuntu2, 2.4.5-5.1ubuntu2.1), mysql-server-5.5:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), multiarch-support:amd64 (2.19-0ubuntu6.3, 2.19-0ubuntu6.5), libdns100:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), krb5-multidev:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), mysql-client-core-5.5:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), libisccfg90:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), systemd-services:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), libssl1.0.0:amd64 (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7, 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8), apt-transport-https:amd64 (1.0.1ubuntu2.5, 1.0.1ubuntu2.6), procps:amd64 (3.3.9-1ubuntu2, 3.3.9-1ubuntu2.2), libbind9-90:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), tcpdump:amd64 (4.5.1-2ubuntu1, 4.5.1-2ubuntu1.1), dbus:amd64 (1.6.18-0ubuntu4.2, 1.6.18-0ubuntu4.3), libgssapi-krb5-2:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libapache2-mod-php5:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), php5-mysql:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), python-urllib3:amd64 (1.7.1-1build1, 1.7.1-1ubuntu0.1), dkms:amd64 (2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5, 2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04), php5-common:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), coreutils:amd64 (8.21-1ubuntu5, 8.21-1ubuntu5.1), libkrb5-3:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), apt-utils:amd64 (1.0.1ubuntu2.5, 1.0.1ubuntu2.6), cpio:amd64 (2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1, 2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1), plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text:amd64 (0.8.8-0ubuntu17, 0.8.8-0ubuntu17.1), python3-software-properties:amd64 (0.92.37.1, 0.92.37.3), libkadm5clnt-mit9:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), mount:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), libsystemd-daemon0:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), python-apt:amd64 (0.9.3.5, 0.9.3.5ubuntu1), libc-dev-bin:amd64 (2.19-0ubuntu6.3, 2.19-0ubuntu6.5), libcgmanager0:amd64 (0.24-0ubuntu7, 0.24-0ubuntu7.2), file:amd64 (5.14-2ubuntu3.2, 5.14-2ubuntu3.3), libapparmor1:amd64 (2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5, 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1), libkrb5-dev:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libmagic1:amd64 (5.14-2ubuntu3.2, 5.14-2ubuntu3.3), libpam-systemd:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), libc-bin:amd64 (2.19-0ubuntu6.3, 2.19-0ubuntu6.5), libc6:amd64 (2.19-0ubuntu6.3, 2.19-0ubuntu6.5), libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.40.0-2, 2.40.2-0ubuntu1), php5-readline:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), libprocps3:amd64 (3.3.9-1ubuntu2, 3.3.9-1ubuntu2.2), libsepol1:amd64 (2.2-1, 2.2-1ubuntu0.1), libglib2.0-dev:amd64 (2.40.0-2, 2.40.2-0ubuntu1), libapt-inst1.5:amd64 (1.0.1ubuntu2.5, 1.0.1ubuntu2.6), libuuid1:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), libmount1:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), dnsutils:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), libdbus-1-3:amd64 (1.6.18-0ubuntu4.2, 1.6.18-0ubuntu4.3), udev:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), curl:amd64 (7.35.0-1ubuntu2.1, 7.35.0-1ubuntu2.3), update-notifier-common:amd64 (0.154.1, 0.154.1ubuntu1), plymouth:amd64 (0.8.8-0ubuntu17, 0.8.8-0ubuntu17.1), libglib2.0-data:amd64 (2.40.0-2, 2.40.2-0ubuntu1), mysql-client-5.5:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), krb5-locales:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libxml2:amd64 (2.9.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu4.3, 2.9.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu4.4), ntp:amd64 (4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2, 4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.2), libudev1:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.7, 204-5ubuntu20.9), binutils:amd64 (2.24-5ubuntu3, 2.24-5ubuntu3.1), bsdutils:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), libxml2-dev:amd64 (2.9.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu4.3, 2.9.1+dfsg1-3ubuntu4.4), libapparmor-perl:amd64 (2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5, 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1), lshw:amd64 (02.16-2ubuntu1, 02.16-2ubuntu1.2), libssl-dev:amd64 (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7, 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8), wget:amd64 (1.15-1ubuntu1, 1.15-1ubuntu1.14.04.1), libapt-pkg4.12:amd64 (1.0.1ubuntu2.5, 1.0.1ubuntu2.6), uuid-runtime:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), python3-apt:amd64 (0.9.3.5, 0.9.3.5ubuntu1), mysql-common:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), php5-cli:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), libmysqlclient18:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), git-man:amd64 (1.9.1-1, 1.9.1-1ubuntu0.1), libplymouth2:amd64 (0.8.8-0ubuntu17, 0.8.8-0ubuntu17.1), libmysqlclient-dev:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), git:amd64 (1.9.1-1, 1.9.1-1ubuntu0.1), python3-distupgrade:amd64 (0.220.5, 0.220.7), libcurl3:amd64 (7.35.0-1ubuntu2.1, 7.35.0-1ubuntu2.3), apport:amd64 (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5, 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6), linux-firmware:amd64 (1.127.7, 1.127.11), libssl-doc:amd64 (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7, 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8), libcurl4-gnutls-dev:amd64 (7.35.0-1ubuntu2.1, 7.35.0-1ubuntu2.3), landscape-common:amd64 (14.01-0ubuntu3, 14.12-0ubuntu0.14.04), libblkid1:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), python3-apport:amd64 (2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5, 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6), apparmor:amd64 (2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5, 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1), tzdata:amd64 (2014e-0ubuntu0.14.04, 2015a-0ubuntu0.14.04), mysql-server:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), software-properties-common:amd64 (0.92.37.1, 0.92.37.3), openssl:amd64 (1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7, 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8), libelf1:amd64 (0.158-0ubuntu5.1, 0.158-0ubuntu5.2), libglib2.0-bin:amd64 (2.40.0-2, 2.40.2-0ubuntu1), libkdb5-7:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), ubuntu-release-upgrader-core:amd64 (0.220.5, 0.220.7), linux-libc-dev:amd64 (3.13.0-37.64, 3.13.0-45.74), util-linux:amd64 (2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.2, 2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.3), python-apt-common:amd64 (0.9.3.5, 0.9.3.5ubuntu1), php5-gd:amd64 (5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4, 5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4.5), libgssrpc4:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libdrm2:amd64 (2.4.52-1, 2.4.56-1~ubuntu1), language-pack-en:amd64 (14.04+20140707, 14.04+20141110), libmysqld-dev:amd64 (5.5.40-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, 5.5.41-0ubuntu0.14.04.1), linux-image-generic:amd64 (3.13.0.37.44, 3.13.0.45.52), libkadm5srv-mit9:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libkrb5support0:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libk5crypto3:amd64 (1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu4.2, 1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1), libisccc90:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), dh-apparmor:amd64 (2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5, 2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1), libc6-dev:amd64 (2.19-0ubuntu6.3, 2.19-0ubuntu6.5), libisc95:amd64 (9.9.5.dfsg-3, 9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.1), libcurl3-gnutls:amd64 (7.35.0-1ubuntu2.1, 7.35.0-1ubuntu2.3), rsyslog:amd64 (7.4.4-1ubuntu2.3, 7.4.4-1ubuntu2.5), ntpdate:amd64 (4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2, 4.2.6.p5+dfsg-3ubuntu2.14.04.2), linux-generic:amd64 (3.13.0.37.44, 3.13.0.45.52) End-Date: 2015-02-12 14:43:37 Kind regards, *Manuel Camargo* Teléfono: 638000836 eMail: sir.louen(a)gmail.com <https://twitter.com/SirLouen> [image: Ver el perfil de Manuel Camargo Lominchar en LinkedIn] <http://es.linkedin.com/in/louen>

4 3

Unable to route outbound with multiple VRRP IP's
by mark＠brightvoip.co.uk 13 Feb '15

13 Feb '15

Hi, I am trying to install a Kamailio server in a HA configuration, with IP's for 3 attached networks. I am using Keepalived/VRRP to manage the VIP's. I have tested v 4.1.6 and latest 4.2.2 I have 3 x listen entries, one for each network and mhomed=1. Also, for info, we have net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 in sysctl.conf listen=udp:my.public.net.46:5060 listen=udp:192.168.106.46:5060 listen=udp:192.168.116.46:5060 mhomed=1 I have dispatcher set up to load balance over two seperate groups of Asterisk servers, one on each private network. Dispatcher does probing to know which Asterisks are 'alive'. When I ran the system, Kamailio/Dispatcher was not able to send any probing OPTIONS to any Asterisk (normal PINGS work fine in all networks in/out of Asterisk/Kamailio) Looking at the log, I see these entries for all 3 networks: Feb 12 17:28:19 app-srv-dev-1-01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2992]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no socket found Feb 12 17:28:19 app-srv-dev-1-01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2992]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(u dp:192.168.116.38:5060) Feb 12 17:28:19 app-srv-dev-1-01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2992]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "192.168.116.38" af 2 (udp:192.168.116.38:5060) Feb 12 17:28:19 app-srv-dev-1-01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2992]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:307]: t_uac_prepare(): t_uac: no socket found Feb 12 17:28:19 app-srv-dev-1-01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[2992]: ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2564]: ds_check_timer(): unable to ping [sip:192.168.1 16.38:5060] I notice from other logging that Kamailio is receiving and processing incoming OPTIONS messages, and sending appropriate replies. Now, this might not be a Kamailio issue, as when I run the same config with 3 IP's, but NOT using VRRP/Keepalived/Aliased IP's, everything works normally. However, I do need to run this setup in HA, so would welcome any suggestions as to how I might resolve this issue. Kind regards, Mark Hall --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com

2 2

Possible memory leak dealing with presence in kamailio
by Nuno Reis 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

Hello all. I'm consistently watching a memory increase in kamailio when dealing with PRESENCE events, namely SIP PUBLISH events. The system eventually hangs running out of memory. This behavior is seen at least in kamailio 4.1 and 4.2. I'm currently using the latest stable 4.2.2. If I disable the SIP PUBLISH handling in kamailio i don't observe the issue anymore but as a side effect I don't have presence (name BLFs) also. What do you think can be the right approach here? Should I open an issue in github for this? Should I run kamailio under valgrind for some time? Are there any other possible debug hints here? Please find attached a code snippet with the presence related parts I'm using right now. Looking forward to hear from you. Best Regards, -- *Nuno Miguel Reis* | *Unified Communication** Systems* M. +351 913907481 | nreis(a)wavecom.pt WAVECOM-Soluções Rádio, S.A. Cacia Park | Rua do Progresso, Lote 15 3800-639 AVEIRO | Portugal T. +351 309 700 225 | F. +351 234 919 191 *GPS <http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=202333747613191340808.0004b4b227a…> | www.wavecom.pt <http://www.wavecom.pt/>** <http://www.wavecom.pt/>* [image: Description: Description: WavecomSignature] <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/wavecom/premios.php> [image: Publicity] <http://www.wavecom.pt/pt/mail_eventos.php>

4 13

Roadmap to next major release 4.3.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

Hello, being discussed yesterday during the IRC devel meeting, the proposed planning for next major release (v4.3.0) is: - freeze the development sometime in April - after mid of March decide the exact date when the development is going to be frozen - testing during last part of April and May - based on testing results, release in the time frame: end of May till mid of June >From git activity, there are already several new modules and plenty of new features -- don't forget to add them to: - http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/features/new-in-devel Also, any detail that is relevant for upgrading has to added to: - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/stable-to-devel Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Using MariaDB with sqlops sql_query_async
by davy van de moere 12 Feb '15

12 Feb '15

Does anyone know if the async queries of kamailio work with mariadb? I'm on kamailio 4.2.3, and I can't get the async way of querying to work. I don't get any errors, but I don't see the queries to be executed. the relevant part of my config is: loadmodule "db_mysql.so" loadmodule "sqlops.so" modparam("sqlops","sqlcon","ca=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@localhost /kamailio") sql_query_async("ca", "insert into cdr_events (callid) values ('$ci') "); When just replace sql_query_async with sql_query, I do see inserts passing by. Do I just bluntly miss something? Or does someone have some good pointers? Thx! Davy

2 3

long l_uuid in uac_reg
by kovarik＠odorik.cz 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hello, rpc funcions: reg_info,reg_enable,reg_disable not work if l_uuid is number and size > than 10, for 1234567890 is O.K. and for 12345678901 try to find 18446744073170328629. kamcmd uac.reg_enable l_uuid 1234567890 -- found kamcmd uac.reg_enable l_uuid 12345678901 -- not found and if number start with zero then zero is cut. kamcmd uac.reg_enable l_uuid 0034567890 -- 34567890 I add debug to uac_reg.c 1615 LM_ERR("START %.*s,%.*s\n", attr.len,attr.s,val.len, val.s); Thaks

2 1

Trouble with DB APIs
by Davidson, Erik 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hey Everyone! I'm currently working on a database module and I've come across some issues/confusion that I was hoping someone could clear up for me. I've been looking at the existing modules and the docs online for help but I can't find a definitive answer for them. 1. I see there are 2 DB APIs (srdb1 and srdb2) and I gather that srdb2 is the newer version? Should I aim to use srdb2 exclusively or should I also use srdb1? 2. It looks like srdb2 provides a db_uri command that can be used to implement custom URI parsing but I can't figure out how to hook into it. I added it to my exported commands but it was never called. When I looked through the code I saw the only place that ever really uses it is db_ctx, which itself looks to be used in the child_init of modules. I'm developing a database module that I want to be a drop-in replacement for others, but it needs multiple hosts specified in the connection uri (similar to the URI example here http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/connection-string/) and I can't figure out the best place to do it. Should I be doing it in db_func_t.init because it has the full string version of the uri and parse it there? Do I then have to reimplement everything that db_do_init would be doing? 3. Do I need to implement multiple database interfaces to get full module coverage in Kamailio? I was looking at db_berkeley as a reference and it looks like it has the KAMAILIO_MOD_INTERFACE as well as the SER_MOD_INTERFACE implemented. 4. Is there a preferred way to handle the API binding (such as db_ commands vs db_bind_api)? Thanks for any help or direction you can give me! - Erik Davidson ----------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.

2 1

Next IRC development meeting
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hello, I thought to propose organizing the next IRC meeting to discuss and sync each other about Kamailio development and surrounding ecosystem. First date proposal is next week, Wednesday, 15:00GMT, Feb 11, 2015, on the usual #kamailio channel at freenode.net. The date can be changed, based on feedback from the people that want to attends. I made a wiki page for the event at: - http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/irc-meetings/2015a Feel free to propose topics to the agenda and/or new date. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

3 4

[Kamailio 4.0.6] sometimes route specified by RTIMER module doesn't be executed just after finishing starting Kamailio server
by jack wang 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hello everyone, I got a little trouble on using the RTIMER module. Sometimes the route block I set using the "exec" parameter in RTIMER module doesn't be executed, this will happen from Kamailio server being started, and only work (not always) after restarting server. I have no idea why this happen, does anyone ever met this? Which part should I notice? Thx :)

1 0

Presence module for BLF issue
by SamyGo 11 Feb '15

11 Feb '15

Hi community, I'm dealing with a problem here related to presence module handling BLF. My BLF phones are Yealink T28p with latest firmware and work perfectly with Asterisk and FreeSwitch but not with Kamailio as expected. What I'm observing here is a malfunctioning statuses due to accumulation of multiple entries of just one status in "presentitiy" table. These entries neither get expired not cleared from DB hence I see atleast 21 XML tags combined in the NOTIFY sent to Phones. Here is what I've figured out a manual way to make the BLF work fine again. *Step -1* Make call between two endpoints. see entries in presentitiy table showing up. *Step -2* NOTIFYs sent to phones subscribing those users from Kamailio and phones show correct flashing red BLF lights *Step -3* clear the entries from presentity table manually i.e mysql> truncate presentity; *Step -4* Hangup the phones, presentity table shows few more entries with state='terminated' NOTIFY sent again to subscribers.. BLF lighst turn green happily. Here are my module params: modparam("presence", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("presence", "notifier_processes", 1) modparam("presence", "server_address", "sip:1.2.5.5" ) modparam("presence", "send_fast_notify", 0) modparam("presence", "db_update_period", 1) modparam("presence", "clean_period", 4) modparam("presence", "subs_db_mode", 2) modparam("presence", "max_expires", 36) modparam("presence", "expires_offset", 10) modparam("presence", "subs_htable_size", 12) modparam("presence", "pres_htable_size", 12) modparam("presence", "fetch_rows", 1000) (these params were set as default earlier but I changed them as above hoping they'll help) Kindly share your expert opinion. Best Regards, Sammy

2 10

Issues while using Kamailio as proxy with Asterisk
by Juned Khan 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hi All, I am using Kamailio as proxy server with Asterisk but having some issues with Inbound and outbound calls. Asterisk is a registrar, Kamailio is a just for proxy. Using softphone call are working fine but using hardphone, its creating issues. Here are the test cases. No Test case *98 Inbound 1 ATA registered with Proxy Domain No No 2 ATA registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 3 ATA registered with Asterisk domain No No 4 ATA registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes 5 Soft phone registered with Proxy Domain Yes Yes 6 Soft phone registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 7 Soft phone registered with Asterisk domain Yes Yes 8 Soft phone registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes Here I am dialling *98 with the mentioned scenario, if it goes to voicemail options then Yes, else No I am using ALLO ATA. Here is my Kamailio.cfg http://pastie.org/9887806 Regards Juned Khan / Network Engineer +91 9974740823/ juned.khan(a)inextrix.com iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd. www.inextrix.com <http://htmlsig.com/www.inextrix.com> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/junedkhan23> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/juned23> [image: Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/+JunedKhan> [image: Linkedin] <http://htmlsig.com/in.linkedin.com/in/junedk> This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

2 1

Kamailio v4.2.3 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v4.2.3 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 4.2, that includes fixes since release of v4.2.2. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on installations of v4.2.x. Deployments running previous v4.x.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v4.2.3. For more details about version 4.2.3 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/2015/02/kamailio-v4-2-3-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

I forgot to precise that I allow only one contact per AOR. modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) save("location", "0x04") From: Mickael Marrache [mailto:mickaelmarrache@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:51 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo Hi, I start with no location nor in Mongo, nor in memory. My UA registers successfully and I can see the location entry in Mongo. Then, I close my UA which unregisters (by setting Expires header to 0). Then, I open the app again and a new registration is made. The entry after first registration. Looks okay. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:55:34Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8809, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip:XXXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp:XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:55:34Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-3378-2", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The same entry after un register (Expires 0). Note that the username field is missing. In any case, I expected the entry to be deleted. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } The entries after second registration. The new entry looks okay. But, the old entry is still here. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb3a7884e581337a25b895"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T09:02:00Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8813, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:02:00Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-337a-1", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The issue is the entry is not deleted after un registering. I precise that registrations are dispatched over multiple registrars with all accesses the same Mongo cluster. Thanks, Mickael

2 7

Kamailio appends firs inserted branch twice
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello I use this version of kamailio kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.0-dev3 (x86_64/linux) 8cdbe7 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8cdbe7 compiled on 17:54:50 Jan 20 2015 with gcc 4.8.2 I hav an issue with append branches to branch route when I need fork call to one endpoint woth different destionations. I use my own algorithm for call to this devices because with lookup("location") I can not use RTPENGINE for different types of endpoints (web endoints and standart UDP endpoints) My alg is here: { sql_query("ca", "select contact from location where username='$tU'", "ra"); xlog("L_INFO","rows: $dbr(ra=>rows) cols: $dbr(ra=>cols)\n"); if($dbr(ra=>rows)>0){ $var(i)=0; while($var(i)<$dbr(ra=>rows)){ xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return contact {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU} at step {$var(i)}\n"); if ($dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO", "This is a Websocket call to endpoint"); sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); $du=$var(recieved); xlog("L_INFO","SQL query return recieved {$var(recieved)} for {$tU}. Destination is {$du}\n"); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "This is a classic UDP call to endpoint"); $var(recieved)=''; sql_pvquery("ca", "select received from location where contact='$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])'","$var(recieved)"); xlog("L_INFO", "SQL query return RECIEVED {$var(recieved)}"); if ($var(recieved)==0){ xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is EMPTY"); $du="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Recieved string is {$var(recieved)}"); $du=$var(recieved); } $var(UDP_contact)="sip:"+$(dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0]){s.select,1,@}); append_branch("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})"); xlog("L_INFO","Classic Destination URI is {$dbr(ra=>[$var(i),0])} for {$tU}}. Destination is {$du}\n"); } $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } } else{ exit; } t_on_branch("1"); return; } } } branch_route[1]{ if($du=~"transport=ws"){ xlog("L_INFO","Websocket Branch is {$du} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("internal extenal force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force RTP/SAVPF"); t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); } else{ xlog("L_INFO","UDP Branch is {$du)} for {$tU}\n"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove RTP/AVP"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); } } So as you see I choose array of devices and then set its to branches. At the kamailio console I see output This is output of alg that above. I have 3 devices: 2 websocket devices and 1 udp But when you look at dump where rtpengine make changes with packets you can see that it runs for 4 devices and 1 and 4 devices is the same. You can see start of every branch from words of log "Websocket Branch is" or "UDP Branch is" So this bug gives a mistake because some of hardphones can not handlie double INVITE and kamilio response for this devices cancel with 200 cause because hardphone set 482 reply to kamialio. (you can see it reply at the log) Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: rows: 3 cols: 1 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:5ue13vsh@2t4iielj109h.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {0} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:a7uo9vsq@7c0oo5kvc71e.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {1} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return contact {sip:upsjchv2@5c88tisd29d4.invalid;transport=ws} for {123455678} at step {2} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: This is a Websocket call to endpoint Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: SQL query return recieved {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678}. Destination is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Creating new call Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.6.14.8:4328;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:85.2.10.3:58509;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59406]: INFO: <script>: Websocket Branch is {sip:18.9.18.10:56917;transport=WS} for {123455678} Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Got valid command from 127.0.0.1:52689: offer - { "sdp": "v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 12.34.56.78#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 12230 RTP/AVP 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012", "ICE": "force", "direction": [ "internal" ], "flags": [ "extenal", "force", "trust-address" ], "replace": [ "origin", ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: ... "session-connection" ], "transport-protocol": "RTP/SAVPF", "call-id": "220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600", "received-from": [ "IP4", "12.34.56.78" ], "from-tag": "as4f0c032f", "command": "offer" } Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'extenal' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: Unknown flag encountered: 'force' Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] Returning to SIP proxy: d3:sdp747:v=0#015#012o=root 1141861088 1141861088 IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012s=Asterisk PBX 13.1.0#015#012c=IN IP4 23.101.139.216#015#012t=0 0#015#012a=ice-lite#015#012m=audio 38518 RTP/SAVPF 9 8 107 0 101#015#012a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:107 opus/48000/2#015#012a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-16#015#012a=maxptime:60#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=rtcp:38519#015#012a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:f31jYQjjKBdYoqWYijx0V/ZtTfP17pTVW8NJGVQ4#015#012a=setup:actpass#015#012a=fingerprint:sh ... Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 rtpengine[55410]: [220725c425526bc941dff8e972bd9458@12.34.56.78:50600] ... a-1 00:E3:0F:B6:C0:9F:D4:16:52:D2:41:A8:01:24:51:CD:3F:FB:B2:55#015#012a=ice-ufrag:VfqUSGBP#015#012a=ice-pwd:t5bLzDaNcqWUwzh7iEtyAZfweGo6#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 1 UDP 2130706431 23.101.139.216 38518 typ host#015#012a=candidate:04GQy5683m4TP1Da 2 UDP 2130706430 23.101.139.216 38519 typ host#015#0126:result2:oke Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 180 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59438]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {18.9.18.10:56917} for method {INVITE}: 482 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100 Feb 8 23:04:43 Kamailio2 kamailio[59442]: INFO: <script>: Manage_Reply from webrtc client {85.2.10.3:58509} for method {INVITE}: 100

2 3

Setting dialog variable when BYE is received before accounting
by Mickael Marrache 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hi, Is there a way to set a dialog variable when a BYE is received so that it can be written in a CDR? I tried as follows but it didn't work: if (loose_route()) { .. if(is_method("BYE")) { if(is_direction("downstream")) { #Call disconnected by caller $dlg_var(dr) = 700; } else { #Call disconnected by callee $dlg_var(dr) = 701; } xlog("Setting disconnect reason to $dlg_var(dr)\n"); } .. exit; } The xlog statement prints: ERROR: <script>: Setting disconnect reason to <null> The doc states: This pseudo-variable will be available only for subsequential requests after doing loose_route(). Thanks, Mickael

2 1

Planing to release Kamailio v4.2.3
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Hello, I am planning to release a new version from latest stable branch - 4.2. Most likely it will be Tuesday next week (Feb 10). If there is something important to take in consideration for this version, reply to sr-dev mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 4

Facing kamailio issue
by taha zafar 10 Feb '15

10 Feb '15

Dear Kamailo team, I am facing problem in connecting kamailio on TLS, even kamailio is listening perfectly. TLS certificate are also tested. Kindly find attached logs and kamailio configuration file and give me your valuable feedback. *Eocean Pvt. Ltd.* *Taha Zafar* VoIP Engineer Mobile: 03318244432 Disclaimer: This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Eocean (Pvt) Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.

2 1

Parallel call forward
by Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi all, I'm getting crazy trying to setup a kamailio to do a parallel call forward to multiple destinations based on a query to the DB. I do the db query and get the RURI's of the destinations I could forward the call to in parallel, then when I get the resulset I do: [...] $var(cf_idx) = 0; while(is_avp_set("$(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0])")) { $ru = $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]); # Set the new RURI to call to $(avp(s:cf_destinations)[0]) = $null; # Setting it to $null pull the value from the stack $(avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)[*]) = $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) * 1000; t_set_fr("$avp(s:callee_fr_inv_timer)"); $(avp(s:cf_timeouts)[0]) = $null; route(ROUTE_ACC_CF); # Do the ACC $(avp(s:acc_state)[*]) = "cfna"; $(avp(s:hih_cause)[*]) = "404"; $var(cf_idx) = $var(cf_idx) + 1; append_branch(); } route(ROUTE_EXECUTE_CF_LOOP); # Some final task and then t_relay [...] But only the last RURI get called How do I do to accomplish this? ... I need to change the $ru of each new branch, so when request get loop-back to the proxy, it do again all the lookup logic. Best regards

2 6

dmq_t_replicate fails with ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
by Leonardo Arena 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi all, I have three Registrar-only proxies DMQ interconnected [1]. I'm attempting to use a client to register to one of them and replicate REGISTRAR message to the other two. * What it works: - Clients registration to proxy1 - Proxy1 replication of REGISTRAR message to proxy2 * What does not work: - Proxy replication of REGISTRAR message to proxy3 * Error message of proxy1: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1770]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding ERROR: dmq [dmq_funcs.c:410]: cfg_dmq_t_replicate(): error calling t_replicate append_branch() did't help me and a search on the ML either. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! - leonardo [1] #-------------------------------------------------------- # Global Definitions #-------------------------------------------------------- debug = 2 fork = yes log_stderror = no # listen = 0.0.0.0 port = 5060 children = 4 dns = no rev_dns = no use_dns_failover = on dns_srv_lb = yes #dns_try_naptr = no mpath = "/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/" #-------------------------------------------------------- # Modules #-------------------------------------------------------- loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" #loadmodule "db_text.so" loadmodule "db_sqlite.so" loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" loadmodule "memcached.so" loadmodule "dmq.so" loadmodule "corex.so" #-------------------------------------------------------- # Module Configuration #-------------------------------------------------------- modparam ( "usrloc", "db_mode", 0 ) modparam ( "usrloc", "use_domain", 1 ) modparam ( "usrloc", "hash_size", 20 ) #modparam ( "ctl", "binrpc_max_body_size", 10000 ) #modparam ( "ctl", "binrpc_struct_max_body_size", 200 ) #default #modparam ( "db_text", "db_mode", 0 ) modparam ( "auth", "use_domain", 1 ) #modparam ( "auth_db", "db_url", "text:///etc/kamailio/dbtext/" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "db_url", "sqlite:///etc/kamailio/kamailiodb" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "use_domain", 1 ) #use plaintext passwords for testing modparam ( "auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 1 ) modparam ( "auth_db", "version_table", 0 ) modparam ( "auth_db", "password_column", "password" ) modparam ( "auth_db", "load_credentials", "$avp(s:username)=username; $avp(s:domain)=domain;$avp(s:password)=password" ) modparam( "memcached", "servers", "localhost:11211" ) modparam( "dmq", "server_address", "sip:10.0.0.1:5060" ) modparam( "dmq", "notification_address", "sip:dmq.my.domain.net" ) #modparam( "dmq", "num_threads", 4 ) # modparam( "dmq", "ping_interval", 60 ) #-------------------------------------------------------- # Main Route Block #-------------------------------------------------------- include_file "kamailio-errors.cfg" route { # Uncomment next line if you want to see # each incoming message xlog( "L_INFO", "$rm: $fu -> $ru" ); if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("20")) { route(ERROR_TOO_MANY_HOPS); } if (msg:len > 4096) { route(ERROR_MESSAGE_OVERFLOW); } if ($rm == "REGISTER" ) { if ( dmq_is_from_node() ) { xlog( "L_INFO", "REGISTER from node" ); route(REGISTER); exit; } else { # if we don't have credentials in cache authenticate against DB if ( $mct($tU@$td) == $null ) { if (!www_authenticate("$td", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("$td", "1"); exit; } else { route(REGISTER); xlog( "L_INFO", "Authenticated user $tU for domain $td against DB" ); # store credentials into cache $mct($avp(s:username)@$avp(s:domain)) = $avp(s:password); exit; } } # credentials are in cache, authenticate against it else { if (!pv_www_authenticate("$td", "$mct($tU@$td)", "0")) { # turn last param to "1" if using ha1 passwords # keep a counter of authentication attempts # if above 1 user is denied auth from cache so we discard the cache and force auth from DB at next attempt if ( $mct(count_$tU@$td) ) == $null { $mct(count_$tU@$td) = 1; } else { $mct(count_$tU@$td) = $null; $mct($tU@$td) = $null; xlog( "L_INFO", "Authentication count limit for user $tU for domain $td against cache reached. Cache discarded" ); } www_challenge("$td", "1"); exit; } else { route(REGISTER); $mct( count_$tU@$td ) = $null; xlog( "L_INFO", "Authenticated user $tU for domain $td against cache" ); exit; } } } } if ( $rm == "KDMQ" ) { dmq_handle_message(); } route(ERROR_INVALID_METHOD); } route[REGISTER] { if (!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); } else { append_branch(); dmq_t_replicate(); } }

3 11

Get the SDP IP in Kamailio
by Sebastian Damm 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hi, since we integrated IPv6 into our existing routing logic, in some cases "fix_nated_sdp" gets called for IPv6 calls, too. (Actually, this just happens because of the mistakenly detected NAT.) But that ends up with a an error in the log. ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:1685]: replace_sdp_ip(): not an IPv4 address in 'c=' SDP So I'm looking for a way to exempt IPv6 calls from that. But I can't find a pseudovariable which carries the SDP contact IP. I guess I could take some function from the sdpops module, but is there a more convenient way to get just the contact IP? Best Regards, Sebastian

2 1

Registrar module and ipv6 addresses
by Sergey Okhapkin 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Registrar module save() function stores "received" field in wrong format like sip:2601:3:8805:107:41E6:C7A1:7724:CF01:5062 When lookup() config function is executed for ipv6 client, kamailio log shows error Feb 3 12:07:34 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[16069]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:254]: uri2dst2(): ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: sip:2601:3:8 805:107:41E6:C7A1:7724:CF01:5062 Feb 3 12:07:34 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[16069]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1709]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches Is it kamailio bug or a problem with my config?

4 5

Understanding t_relay
by Ryan Brindley 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hey community, I'm trying to understand t_relay () when a forward times out. This is an abbreviated version of what i have: Request_route { ... Route(do1) } Route [do1] { ... T_on_reply (1reply) T_on_failure (1fail) T_relay () } Reply_route[1reply] { ... If (t_check_status (302)) { Route (do2) } } Failure_route [1fail] { Xlog (dafail1) } Route [do2]{ ... T_on_reply (2reply) T_on_failure (2fail) T_relay () } Reply_route [2reply]{ Xlog (twerked) } Failure_route [2fail]{ Xlog (failured) } The case im currently interested in is when the first relay (do1) returns a 302 and then the second (do2) times out. What happens on the second when it times out, it hits the 1fail failure_route. This messes with my logic as i would've expected (and want to find out how to make it) hit the 2nd failure_route. I also noticed that if i loop and try the do2 again after the first failure it will then hit the 2fail route. Any clarification on this subject would be greatly appreciated, Ryan

2 3

Inconsistency between dlg_list and 'get_statistics dialog:'
by mayamatakeshi 09 Feb '15

09 Feb '15

Hello, I am counting the number o dialogs using this: # kamctl fifo dlg_list |grep dialog:: |wc -l 126 However when I use 'get_statistics dialog:' I get this: # kamctl fifo get_statistics dialog: dialog:active_dialogs = 67 dialog:early_dialogs = 3 dialog:expired_dialogs = 253 dialog:failed_dialogs = 29529 dialog:processed_dialogs = 338783 The number of dialogs don't match (i tested this several times). What could be causing this? (I am using kamailio 4.1). Regards, Takeshi

2 3

One Way RTP from destination SIP server using rtpengine
by Don Fanning 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

Hello All, I currently am running Kamailio in a WSS configuration with sipML5. I use rtpengine to convert a RTP/SAVPF packet to a RTP/AVP packet as the destination server only supports AVP or SAVP. RTPEngine has no issues rewriting the packet going out, the SIP session comes up and handshakes correctly to start the session. Then the remote server sends the RTP stream back and I'm having issues getting Kamailio or RTPEngine or something to take the RTP stream, process it back to SAVPF and send it back out the WSS port. I see no RTP data come from Kam/RTPengine going towards the remote server. On the server side, I do see STUN being called and the sipML5 bind successfully but that's it. Both the destination and server sit without firewalls in the way so the problem has to be what I'm doing in Kamailio. My config is located here: http://pastebin.com/dWLdUz5j Packet dumps available upon request. Thanks for any assistance!

4 7

RTPEngine Intermittent One Way Audio Issue SRTP => RTP
by Tim Chubb 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

Hi, I am currently experiencing an intermittent one way audio issue, when using RTPEngine and proxying between srtp and rtp. There is no apparent pattern, I have managed to repeat the on the 7th, 23rd, and 63rd calls to a test number, where upon connection only audio in the RTP => SRTP direction was working. All other test calls worked as normal. Digging through the RTPEngine log file the only abnormalities I can see are: Discarded invalid SRTP packet: authentication failed entries on the calls that had the one way audio issue. What could be causing this? Thanks Tim.

2 3

Multiple OR into a if
by Igor Potjevlesch 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Hello, I'm very disappointed because of the following behaviour: if ($tu=~"^sip:0[1-9]{9}") { [.] In that case, Kamailio returns TRUE because the instructions in the block are executed. } if ($rU=~"^33" || $rU=~"^0033" || $rU=~"^0[1-9]{9}" || $rU=~"^\+33" || $tu=~"^sip:33" || $tu=~"^sip:0033" || $tu=~"^sip:0[1-9]{9}" || $tu=~"^sip:\+33" ) { [.] In that case, Kamailio should return FALSE because the instructions in the block are not executed. } Am I missed something regarding 'OR' ? Regards, Igor.

2 8

Kamailio load balansing 2 servers issues
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Hello. We use 2 kamailio server 4.3 master brancher for load balansing cluster. We have some problems with this deplooiment fist of all we have REgstering issue: Witth one server all works fine (we have some endpoints with same creditians) all endpoints reinging well. But at 2 servers we hawe problem with this- call ringing only at one endpoint. We use Database for USRLOC module modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) As i think it mean al connections to servers ives at database. We have one database for 2 servers and this is means it only one table LOCATION for its. The second problen id that when loadbalanser sends bye to kamailio from the outside- bye is not recieves to endpoint. It say that no transaction with this CallID. I think it is because transaction goues through another kamailio and kamiaio that recieves BYE does not know about it transaction. So my first qestion- Does anybody have some information about loafd balansiong between kamailios? And second question - how to resolve issue with LOCATION table? Thanks

3 3

Siremis domain querry reports SQL error
by Marek Moravcik 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Hello, after upgrading Siremis from 3.1 to 4.1 he starts report SQL errors on more places. But most annoying is error in domain list. I've tried to reinstall Siremis, drop database, but nothing helps. On other server after same upgrade, everything goes well. Only difference is, that error server has 64 bit architecture. Both servers have Kamailio 4.2.1. Where shall I look for problem? Here is domain list error: [2015-02-05 18:45:32 (GMT)] An exception occurred while executing this script: Error message: #0, Error in query:: SELECT T0.id, T0.domain, T0.did, T0.last_modified FROM domain T0 LIMIT 10. SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'T0.did' in 'field list' Script name and line number of error: /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/data/BizDataObj_Lite.php:447 function: _run_search ( Array(2) ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/data/BizDataObj_Lite.php 243 function: fetch ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/EasyForm.php 690 function: fetchDataSet ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/FormRenderer.php 69 function: renderSmarty ( Object(EasyForm), "/home/palo/sip/siremis/modules/ser/template..." ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/FormRenderer.php 45 function: render ( Object(EasyForm) ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/EasyForm.php 1648 function: renderHTML ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/EasyForm.php 1538 function: render ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/ViewRenderer.php 83 function: renderSmarty ( Object(EasyView), "/home/palo/sip/siremis/modules/ser/template..." ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/ViewRenderer.php 40 function: render ( Object(EasyView) ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/EasyView.php 274 function: _render ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/easy/EasyView.php 237 function: render ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 221 function: renderView ( "ser.view.DomainListView", "", "", Null, "" ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 107 function: dispatchRequest ( ) @ /home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/BizController.php 32 function: include_once ( "/home/palo/sip/openbiz/bin/BizController.ph..." ) @ /home/palo/sip/siremis/bin/controller.php 6 function: include ( "/home/palo/sip/siremis/bin/controller.php" ) @ /home/palo/sip/siremis/bin/_forward.php 102 function: include ( "/home/palo/sip/siremis/bin/_forward.php" ) @ /home/palo/sip/siremis/index.php 3 Thanks! Marek Moravcik

2 1

How to install kamailio-4.2.2 in DEBIAN -7.1.0
by Yanko Marín Muro 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

Hello: How to install kamailio-4.2.2 in DEBIAN -7.1.0-amd64? This URL is the last version: http://www.kamailio.org/pub/kamailio/4.2.2/src/kamailio-4.2.2_src.tar.gz Best regards, Yanko Antonio Marín Muro --- This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gateway 5.6.28/RELEASE running at host imx3.etecsa.cu Visit our web-site: <http://www.kaspersky.com>, <http://www.viruslist.com>

3 2

Issue with dlg_setflag vs. setflag
by Anthony Messina 06 Feb '15

06 Feb '15

I'm currently using Kamailio built from master@e59db79 and have been following the recent threads about the dialog module as I'm moving toward adding dialog support for presence and CDRs in my setup. However, I seem to have come across an issue where dlg_setflag() does nothing, while setflag() works properly with the following (trimmed) script. So for now, I issue setflag(FLT_DIALOG) for INVITE rather than dlg_setflag(FLT_DIALOG). Is there something I'm missing about dlg_setflag()? #!define FLT_DIALOG 4 request_route { route(REQINIT); route(NATDETECT); if(is_method("CANCEL")) { if(t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } route(WITHINDLG); if(t_precheck_trans()) { t_check_trans(); exit; } t_check_trans(); route(AUTH); remove_hf("Route"); if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route(); if(is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # Enable dialog support (dlg_setflag not working) #dlg_setflag(FLT_DIALOG); setflag(FLT_DIALOG); } route(SIPOUT); route(PRESENCE); route(REGISTRAR); if($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } route(PSTN); route(LOCATION); route(RELAY); } route[WITHINDLG] { if(!has_totag()) return; if(loose_route()) { route(DLGURI); if(is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # Testing dialog flag xlog("L_INFO", "Completed $dlg(from_uri) to $dlg(to_uri) - $DLG_lifetime duration\n"); } else if(is_method("ACK")) { route(NATMANAGE); } else if(is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } route(RELAY); exit; } if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri==myself) { route(PRESENCE); exit; } if(is_method("ACK")) { if(t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); exit; } else { exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not Found"); exit; } -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 2

Siremis v4.2.0 Released
by Elena-Ramona Modroiu 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, Siremis v4.2.0 has been released, web management interface aiming at compatibility with Kamailio v4.2.x series - notes about release are available at: - http://siremis.asipto.com/2015/02/02/siremis-v4-2-0-released/ Ramona

3 3

Best module to use for interrupting a call ???
by Uri Shacked 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, I need to create some kind of check with an application outside of kamailio every X seconds. The check is per call, to get its status or something and according to the result do something with the call (transfer, send info or hangup...). I read about call_control and cnxcc modules. It seems these last ones are to much to do in order to get what i need. Is there a simpler module to use? BR, Uri

2 2

Kamailio v4.1.8 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v4.1.8 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the previous stable branch, 4.1, that includes fixes since release of v4.1.7. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on installations of v4.1.x. Deployments running previous v4.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v4.1.8 or latest 4.2.x. For more details about version 4.1.8 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/2015/02/kamailio-v4-1-8-released/ Note: the latest stable branch is 4.2, at this moment with its latest release v4.2.2. See more details about it at: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/2014/10/kamailio-v4-2-0-released/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Lint and syntax check
by Manuel Rubio 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, I want to know if someone is using something similar to lint-like behaviour[1] and syntax highlighting in editors like Sublime, TextMate, emacs, ... for Kamailio configuration files. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lint_%28software%29 Thanks. Manuel Rubio.

3 2

kamailio passthrough user auth
by Kai Arif 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, I have to implement a rather uncommon SIP setup and wanted to ask, if it is even possible with Kamailio. We are among other things a VoIP-provider for a couple of hundred customers. Right now we use a rather old piece of software as a SIP-server, that was written in-house and is deeply integrated in our user interfaces and the billing system and can't be replaced easily. But now we need to make some modifications because our PSTN-gateway-provider is changing things. The idea is to use Kamailio as proxy in front of our old SIP-server. But to do this we need to pass through the REGISTER requests of our users to the old SIP-server. So the question is if Kamailio supports this kind of passthrough and I would also be rely grateful for a piece of example config, if somebody already has a similar setup running. So far neither the documentation nor google have been very helpful. Best regards Kai -- Kai Arif - System Administrator Inter.net Germany GmbH Knesebeckstraße 59-61 10719 Berlin Germany Fon +49 30 25430 0 Fax +49 30 25430 499 arif(a)team.de.inter.net www.de.inter.net Legal-Information: Inter.net Germany GmbH, HRB #79136, Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg, UST-IdNr:: DE 813 165 159 FA für Körperschaften I Berlin, Geschäftsführer: Jörn Lubkoll, Christian Röhl Zuständige Regulierungsbehörde: Bundesnetzagentur Chemnitz, Liselotte-Herrmann-Str. 20a, 09127 Chemnitz, Registriernummer: 06/164

2 1

Does the event_route[tm:local-request] support stateless forwarding configured in the script?
by Klaus Feichtinger 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hello, I´m searching for a way to keep track about success or failure of locally generated SUBSCRIBE transactions, which are typically triggered by the RLS module. In case that a subscription is rejected by the subscribee with any negative response code or the transaction is timing out, I have to trigger a specific action (e.g. sending a PUBLISH message to another user agent). This seems to be not so easy.... As Kamailio does not support referencing a failure_route to locally generated requests, I had the idea to "forward()" locally generated requests in the event_route "tm:local-request" to itself and handle the forwarded requests in the standard request_route, which would offer all usual options. But that seems not to be supported / allowed by Kamailio, as I have in practical tests (1) an outgoing request that is sent to the original Destination-URI (with a malformed "Content-Length" SIP hdr) and (2) the second request that is sent to the manual target (loop). I´ve found in the mailing list that elder Kamailio versions did not support any common way for this feature. However, can anybody give m a hint if / how this could eventually be solved with the event_route or in any alternative route? It seems that the Kamailio internally generated requests are still below the radar of TM or any other route blocks except tm:local-request..... regards, Klaus

2 1

Out of Memory Error in Kamailio
by Neeraj Swarnkar 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi Guys, I am using Kamailio-4.2.1. Earlier I was using shared memory of 16GB, which started popping out of memory error, within few seconds of generating load from sipp. I used sipp following command: sipp -s 999999999999 MY_KAM_IP -l 2500 -r 50 *Error coming is :* *Feb 4 14:12:23 kamailio_us_ha1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[27389]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1946]: relay_reply(): ERROR: relay_reply: cannot alloc reply shmem* After changing the shared memory to 1 GB, this error came quite late when generate load at 200 CPS. sipp -s 999999999999MY_KAM_IP -l 2500 -r 200 Why this is happening? I am using following configuration file( kamailio.cfg). Earliest possible help will be appreciated a lot!! #!KAMAILIO # # Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v4.0 - default configuration script # - web: http://www.kamailio.org # - git: http://sip-router.org # # Direct your questions about this file to: <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> # # Refer to the Core CookBook at http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ # for an explanation of possible statements, functions and parameters. # # Several features can be enabled using '#!define WITH_FEATURE' directives: # # *** To run in debug mode: # - define WITH_DEBUG # # *** To enable mysql: # - define WITH_MYSQL # # *** To enable authentication execute: # - enable mysql # - define WITH_AUTH # - add users using 'kamctl' # # *** To enable IP authentication execute: # - enable mysql # - enable authentication # - define WITH_IPAUTH # - add IP addresses with group id '1' to 'address' table # # *** To enable persistent user location execute: # - enable mysql # - define WITH_USRLOCDB # # *** To enable nat traversal execute: # - define WITH_NAT # - install RTPProxy: http://www.rtpproxy.org # - start RTPProxy: # rtpproxy -l _your_public_ip_ -s udp:localhost:7722 # # *** To enable TLS support execute: # - adjust CFGDIR/tls.cfg as needed # - define WITH_TLS # # *** To enhance accounting execute: # - enable mysql # - define WITH_ACCDB # - add following columns to database # define WITH_LCR to enable LCR # define WITH_CR to enable carrier route #!define WITH_MYSQL #!define DBURL #!define WITH_USRLOCDB #!define WITH_FREESWITCH #!define WITH_ACCDB #!define WITH_AUTH #!define WITH_DEBUG #!define WITH_NAT #----#!define WITH_ANTIFLOOD #!define WITH_CR #!ifdef WITH_FREESWITCH #freeswitch.bindip = "10.60.23.81" desc "FreeSWITCH IP Address" freeswitch.bindip = "54.254.97.209" desc "FreeSWITCH IP Address" freeswitch.bindport = "5060" desc "FreeSWITCH Port" #!endif #!ifdef ACCDB_COMMENT ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN src_user VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN src_domain VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN src_ip varchar(64) NOT NULL default ''; ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN dst_ouser VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN dst_user VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE acc ADD COLUMN dst_domain VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN src_user VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN src_domain VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN src_ip varchar(64) NOT NULL default ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN dst_ouser VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN dst_user VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; ALTER TABLE missed_calls ADD COLUMN dst_domain VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''; #!endif ####### Include Local Config If Exists ######### import_file "kamailio-local.cfg" import_file "ip.cfg" ####### Defined Values ######### # *** Value defines - IDs used later in config #!ifdef WITH_MYSQL # - database URL - used to connect to database server by modules such # as: auth_db, acc, usrloc, a.s.o. #!ifndef DBURL #!define DBURL "mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio " #!endif #!endif #!define MULTIDOMAIN 0 # - flags # FLT_ - per transaction (message) flags # FLB_ - per branch flags #!define FLT_ACC 1 #!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2 #!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3 #!define FLT_NATS 5 #!define FLB_NATB 6 #!define FLB_NATSIPPING 7 ####### Global Parameters ######### ### LOG Levels: 3=DBG, 2=INFO, 1=NOTICE, 0=WARN, -1=ERR #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG debug=-1 log_stderror=no #!else debug=-1 log_stderror=no #!endif memdbg=2 memlog=2 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 fork=yes children=8 /* uncomment the next line to disable TCP (default on) */ #disable_tcp=yes /* uncomment the next line to disable the auto discovery of local aliases based on reverse DNS on IPs (default on) */ auto_aliases=no /* add local domain aliases */ #alias="sip.mydomain.com" /* uncomment and configure the following line if you want Kamailio to bind on a specific interface/port/proto (default bind on all available) */ #listen=udp:10.0.0.10:5060 #listen=udp:172.31.42.191:5060 advertise 54.254.97.209:5060 listen=LOCAL_BIND_PROTO_IP_UDP_PORT advertise ADVERTISED_BIND_IP_PORT listen=LOCAL_BIND_PROTO_IP_TCP_PORT advertise ADVERTISED_BIND_IP_PORT /* port to listen to * - can be specified more than once if needed to listen on many ports */ port=5060 mhomed=0 #!ifdef WITH_TLS enable_tls=yes #!endif # life time of TCP connection when there is no traffic # - a bit higher than registration expires to cope with UA behind NAT tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 ####### Modules Section ######## # set paths to location of modules (to sources or installation folders) #!ifdef WITH_SRCPATH mpath="modules_k:modules" #!else mpath="/usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_MYSQL loadmodule "db_mysql.so" #!endif loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "corex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so" loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "rtimer.so" loadmodule "sqlops.so" loadmodule "dispatcher.so" loadmodule "pdt.so" loadmodule "mi_datagram.so" loadmodule "domain.so" loadmodule "htable.so" loadmodule "pike.so" #!ifdef WITH_LCR #Neeraj: Load LCR Module loadmodule "lcr.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_CR #Neeraj: Load CR Module loadmodule "carrierroute.so" loadmodule "avpops.so" #!endif #loadmodule "nat_traversal.so" #!ifdef WITH_AUTH loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH loadmodule "permissions.so" #!endif #!endif #!ifdef WITH_NAT loadmodule "nathelper.so" loadmodule "rtpproxy.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS loadmodule "tls.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG loadmodule "debugger.so" #!endif # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # for mi_datagram modparam("mi_datagram", "socket_name", "udp:127.0.0.1:8033") # for sqlops modparam("rtimer", "timer", "name=cdr;interval=300;mode=1;") modparam("rtimer", "exec", "timer=cdr;route=CDRS") modparam("sqlops", "sqlcon", "cb=>mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") # for domain modparam("domain", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") #modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1) # Use caching modparam("domain", "domain_table", "domain") modparam("domain", "register_myself", 1) # ----- mi_fifo params ----- modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") # ----- tm params ----- # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) # default retransmission timeout: 3sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) # default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 5sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 30000) # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "db_url","mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") # ---- pdt params------ modparam("pdt", "db_url","mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") #modparam("pdt", "table_name", "pdt") modparam("pdt", "fetch_rows", 4000) modparam("pdt", "check_domain", 0) # ----- rr params ----- # add value to ;lr param to cope with most of the UAs modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # do not append from tag to the RR (no need for this script) modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1) # ----- registrar params ----- modparam("registrar", "method_filtering", 1) /* uncomment the next line to disable parallel forking via location */ modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) /* uncomment the next line not to allow more than 1 contacts per AOR */ modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) # max value for expires of registrations modparam("registrar", "max_expires", 3600) # set it to 1 to enable GRUU modparam("registrar", "gruu_enabled", 0) # ----- acc params ----- /* what special events should be accounted ? */ modparam("acc", "early_media", 0) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 0) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 0) /* by default ww do not adjust the direct of the sequential requests. if you enable this parameter, be sure the enable "append_fromtag" in "rr" module */ modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1) /* account triggers (flags) */ modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;" "dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACCFAILED) /* enhanced DB accounting */ #!ifdef WITH_ACCDB modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") modparam("acc", "db_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;" "dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") #!endif # ----- usrloc params ----- /* enable DB persistency for location entries */ #!ifdef WITH_USRLOCDB modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") # Neeraj : Disabled Saving Location in DB #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Neeraj : Enabling Multiple Domain modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) #!endif # ----- auth_db params ----- #!ifdef WITH_AUTH modparam("auth_db", "db_url","mysql:// kamailio:kamailiorw@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "") modparam("auth_db", "use_domain", MULTIDOMAIN) # ----- permissions params ----- #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH modparam("permissions", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("permissions", "db_mode", 1) #!endif #!endif #!ifdef WITH_NAT # ----- rtpproxy params ----- #modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:127.0.0.1:7722") modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:10.0.0.121:22222") # ----- nathelper params ----- modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", FLB_NATSIPPING) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@kamailio.org") # params needed for NAT traversal in other modules modparam("nathelper|registrar", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)") modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", FLB_NATB) #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "config", "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls.cfg") #!endif #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG # ----- debugger params ----- modparam("debugger", "cfgtrace", 0) #!endif #!ifdef WITH_LCR modparam("lcr", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailioro:kamailioro@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") modparam("lcr", "gw_uri_avp", "$avp(i:709)") modparam("lcr", "ruri_user_avp", "$avp(i:500)") modparam("lcr", "tag_avp", "$avp(lcr_tag)") modparam("lcr", "flags_avp", "$avp(i:712)") modparam("lcr", "lcr_id_avp", "$avp(s:lcr_id_avp)") modparam("lcr", "defunct_gw_avp", "$avp(s:defunct_gw_avp)") #!endif #!ifdef WITH_CR #Neeraj: ----carrierroute params------- modparam("carrierroute", "config_source", "db") modparam("carrierroute", "db_url", "mysql:// kamailioro:kamailioro@kamailio-us.cejtf390jur8.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com/kamailio ") modparam("carrierroute", "carrierroute_table", "carrierroute") modparam("carrierroute", "default_tree", "default") modparam("carrierroute", "fetch_rows", 2000) #!endif ####### Routing Logic ######## # Main SIP request routing logic # - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route # - note: this is the same as route { ... } request_route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # NAT detection route(NATDETECT); # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); ### only initial requests (no To tag) t_check_trans(); # authentication route(AUTH); # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route(); # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } #!ifdef WITH_LCR #Neeraj: oute request to LCR route(LCR); #!endif # dispatch requests to foreign domains route(SIPOUT); ### requests for my local domains # handle registrations route(REGISTRAR); if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } #!ifdef WITH_CR # route(CARRIER_ROUTE); #!endif # user location service route(LOCATION); } #!ifdef WITH_CR route[CARRIER_ROUTE] { if(!cr_route("default", "default", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")){ sl_send_reply("403", "Not Carrier Found"); exit; } else { # In case of failure, re-route the request #t_on_failure(1); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); # Relay the request to the gateway # t_relay(); } } failure_route[1] { xlog("route[FAILOVER_ROUTE: called"); # In case of failure, send it to an alternative route: if (t_check_status("403|5[0-9][0-9]")) { #choose route domain 1 of the default carrier if(!cr_route("failover", "failover", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")){ t_reply("403", "Not allowed"); } else { t_on_failure("2"); # t_relay(); } } } #!endif #!ifdef WITH_CR_OLD route[CARRIER_ROUTE] { xlog("route[CARRIER_ROUTE: called"); # LOOKUP ROUTE TABLE WHEN ASKED BY HEADER: X-ROUTE:LOOKUP if (is_method("INVITE") && $hdr(X-ROUTE)=="LOOKUP"){ if(!cr_route("default", "default", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id","$avp(s:route_desc)")){ xlog("CARRIER_ROUTE:ROUTING FAILED: no route found for $rU"); sl_send_reply("604", "Unable to route this call"); exit; } else { xlog("CARRIER_ROUTE:LOOKUP FOUND: $rd $avp(s:route_desc)"); avp_pushto("$ru/username", "$avp(s:route_desc)"); sl_send_reply("302", "$rd"); exit; } } else { xlog("route[CARRIER_ROUTE: method is not either INVITE or X-ROUTE LOOKUP"); } } #!endif #!ifdef WITH_LCR route[LCR] { if (status=="200") { xlog("LCR: Inside the LCR route\n"); } if(method=="INVITE") { xlog("We got an invite for: '$rU'"); if(!load_gws(1, $rU, $var(caller_uri))) { xlog("Couldn't load gateways"); sl_send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error - Cannot load gateways"); exit; } else { xlog("GW Selected '$avp(i:709)'\n"); xlog("Domain of destination: $dd\n"); xlog("To URI: $tu\n"); } if(!next_gw()) { xlog("Couldn't proceed to next gateway"); sl_send_reply("503", "Service not available, no gateways found"); exit; } else { xlog("Calling the first matched gateway\n"); xlog("ruri_user_avp: '$avp(i:500)'\n"); xlog("To URI after next_gw: $tu\n"); xlog("Request URI: $rU\n"); } }; } #!endif route[FSDISPATCH] { # dial number selection route(FSRELAY); exit; } route[FSRELAY] { $du = "sip:" + $sel(cfg_get.freeswitch.bindip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.freeswitch.bindport); if($var(newbranch)==1) { append_branch(); $var(newbranch) = 0; } route(RELAY); exit; } route[RELAY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } #!endif # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. if (is_method("INVITE|BYE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { if(!t_is_set("branch_route")) t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); } if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { if(!t_is_set("onreply_route")) t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); } if (is_method("INVITE")) { if(!t_is_set("failure_route")) t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Per SIP request initial checks route[REQINIT] { #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD # flood dection from same IP and traffic ban for a while # be sure you exclude checking trusted peers, such as pstn gateways # - local host excluded (e.g., loop to self) if(src_ip!=myself) { if($sht(ipban=>$si)!=$null) { # ip is already blocked xdbg("request from blocked IP - $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); exit; } if (!pike_check_req()) { xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: pike blocking $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); $sht(ipban=>$si) = 1; exit; } } #!endif if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { route(DLGURI); if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) { # ACK is forwarded statelessy route(NATMANAGE); } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) { # Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per RFC 6665. record_route(); } route(RELAY); } else { if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be an ACK after a 487 # or e.g. 404 from upstream server route(RELAY); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } if (!save("location",5)) sl_reply_error(); exit; } } # USER location service route[LOCATION] { if (!lookup("location")) { $var(rc) = $rc; t_newtran(); switch ($var(rc)) { case -1: case -3: if(!cr_route("default", "default", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")){ sl_send_reply("403", "Not Carrier Found"); exit; } break; case -2: send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); } route(RELAY); exit; } # Authentication route route[AUTH] { #!ifdef WITH_AUTH #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH if((!is_method("REGISTER")) && allow_source_address()) { # source IP allowed return; } #!endif if (is_method("REGISTER") || from_uri==myself) { # authenticate requests if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "1")) { auth_challenge("$fd", "0"); exit; } # user authenticated - remove auth header if(!is_method("REGISTER|PUBLISH")) consume_credentials(); } # if caller is not local subscriber, then check if it calls # a local destination, otherwise deny, not an open relay here if (from_uri!=myself && uri!=myself) { sl_send_reply("403","Not relaying"); exit; } #!endif return; } # Caller NAT detection route route[NATDETECT] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT force_rport(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { # fix_nated_register(); fix_nated_contact(); } else { add_contact_alias(); } setflag(FLT_NATS); } #!endif return; } # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (is_request()) { if(has_totag()) { if(check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } } } if (!(isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB))) return; rtpproxy_manage("co"); if (is_request()) { if (!has_totag()) { if(t_is_branch_route()) { add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); } } } if (is_reply()) { if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { add_contact_alias(); } } #!endif return; } # URI update for dialog requests route[DLGURI] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if(!isdsturiset()) { handle_ruri_alias(); } #!endif return; } route[CDRS] { sql_query("cb","call kamailio_cdrs()","rb"); sql_query("cb","call kamailio_rating('default')","rb"); } # Routing to foreign domains route[SIPOUT] { if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(RELAY); } } # manage outgoing branches branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] { xdbg("new branch [$T_branch_idx] to $ru\n"); route(NATMANAGE); } # manage incoming replies onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] { xdbg("incoming reply\n"); if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") route(NATMANAGE); } # manage failure routing cases failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] { route(NATMANAGE); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } } # Dispatch requests route[DISPATCH] { # round robin dispatching on gateways group '1' if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); return; } # Sample failure route failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } # next DST - only for 500 or local timeout if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { if(ds_next_dst()) { t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } } Regards Neeraj Swarnkar

2 1

Planing to release Kamailio v4.1.8
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hello, I am planning to release a new version from previous stable branch - 4.1. Most likely it will be Thursday or Friday this week. If there is something important to take in consideration for that version, reply to sr-dev mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 1

Linking Kamailio to Asterisk
by Brian Echesa 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, Kindly assist. I have successfully installed Kamailio and Asterisk. Asterisk is acting as an PSTN in my case. The trunk between Kamailio and Asterisk is up. Issue is that i can not route calls to the PSTN. I am using the default configuration version: kamailio 4.2.2 (i386/linux) OS: Debian wheezy -- Kind regards, Brian Linux registered user: . #565878 www.brianechesa.com

2 1

RTPEngine - No support for kernel packet forwarding available
by Muhammad Shahzad 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi, I have latest stable release of RTPEngine deployed in a virtual machine (KVM) along with Kamailio v4.2. All is working fine except i see this message in RTPEngine logs, -- rtpengine[16455]: [82qrjq0hdtt45afbqo98 port 40960] Kernelizing media stream rtpengine[16455]: [82qrjq0hdtt45afbqo98 port 40960] No support for kernel packet forwarding available -- using lsmod command i see that module xt_RTPENGINE is load. -- Module Size Used by iptable_mangle 12488 0 xt_RTPENGINE 22068 3 iptable_nat 12800 0 nf_nat 17924 1 iptable_nat ... -- Also the iptables rule for RTPEngine exists, i.e. -- Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 224K packets, 37M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 224K 37M rtpengine all -- any any anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 224K packets, 37M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain rtpengine (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 2022 414K RTPENGINE udp -- any any anywhere anywhere RTPENGINE id:0 -- Yet still RTPEngine is not able to kernelize the RTP stream and does user-space packet forwarding? Can you guys suggest what could be wrong here? Thank you.

3 4

Issues while using Kamailio as proxy with Asterisk
by Juned Khan 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi All, I am using Kamailio as proxy server with Asterisk but having some issues with Inbound and outbound calls. Asterisk is a registrar, Kamailio is a just for proxy. Using softphone call are working fine but using hardphone, its creating issues. Here are the test cases. No Test case *98 Inbound 1 ATA registered with Proxy Domain No No 2 ATA registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 3 ATA registered with Asterisk domain No No 4 ATA registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes 5 Soft phone registered with Proxy Domain Yes Yes 6 Soft phone registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 7 Soft phone registered with Asterisk domain Yes Yes 8 Soft phone registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes Here I am dialling *98 with the mentioned scenario, if it goes to voicemail options then Yes, else No I am using ALLO ATA. Here is my http://pastie.org/9887806 Regards Juned Khan / Network Engineer +91 9974740823/ juned.khan(a)inextrix.com iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd. www.inextrix.com <http://htmlsig.com/www.inextrix.com> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/junedkhan23> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/juned23> [image: Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/+JunedKhan> [image: Linkedin] <http://htmlsig.com/in.linkedin.com/in/junedk> This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

1 0

Send sip INFO req from kamailio
by Uri Shacked 04 Feb '15

04 Feb '15

Hi, Any idea how to send a SIP INFO req ? I am familiar with uac_req_send. but how do I send it with in a specific dialog and with data in the INFO req ? BR, Uri

2 1

kamailio 4.2.1 core in timer.c:877
by 张顺通 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I user rtimer module : loadmodule "rtimer.so" modparam("rtimer", "timer", "name=p_route;interval=1;mode=1;") modparam("rtimer", "exec", "timer=p_route;route=P_ROUTE") application will coredump in sometimes, and core file in below, what's the reason? Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00000000005fda98 in timer_list_expire (t=1043586690, h=0x7f9ed45ac9b0, slow_l=0x7f9ed45adc80, slow_mark=2316) at timer.c:877 877 timer.c: No such file or directory. in timer.c (gdb) bt full #0 0x00000000005fda98 in timer_list_expire (t=1043586690, h=0x7f9ed45ac9b0, slow_l=0x7f9ed45adc80, slow_mark=2316) at timer.c:877 tl = 0x7f9ed47f7e98 ret = 0 #1 0x00000000005fc686 in timer_handler () at timer.c:953 saved_ticks = 1043586690 run_slow_timer = 0 i = 268 __FUNCTION__ = "timer_handler" #2 0x00000000005fdd4d in timer_main () at timer.c:992 No locals. #3 0x00000000004aa571 in main_loop () at main.c:1700 i = 12 pid = 0 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=11 sock=10.1.*.*:5160\000\000\b\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\060S\324\236\177\000\000\060=#z\001\000\000\000(\205V\324\236\177\000\000\060=#z\377\177\000\000\214\216N\000\000\000\000\000\037t\372D\000\000\000\000(\205V\324\236\177\000\000\220@ #z\377\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000" nrprocs = 12 __FUNCTION__ = "main_loop" #4 0x00000000004af166 in main (argc=11, argv=0x7fff7a234098) at main.c:2561 cfg_stream = 0x1da75e0 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x7fff7a234681 "" tmp_len = 32767 port = 2049130512 proto = 32673 options = 0x706ec0 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:" ret = -1 seed = 220012340 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 0 n_lst = 0xb p = 0x0 __FUNCTION__ = "main"

2 5

[OT] ssl certificates updated for kamailio.org
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hello, short note to say that I updated the ssl certificates for kamailio.org web site. They are issued by cacert.org, which is probably not trusted by most of the browsers, but they are well known in the open source environment. If you get a warning about certificate change and the issuer is cacert.org, then you should be safe to login over https (e.g., to edit the wiki pages). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 1

Issues while using Kamailio as proxy with Asterisk
by Juned Khan 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hi All, I am using Kamailio as proxy server with Asterisk but having some issues with Inbound and outbound calls. Here are the test cases. No Test case *98 Inbound 1 ATA registered with Proxy Domain No No 2 ATA registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 3 ATA registered with Asterisk domain No No 4 ATA registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes 5 Soft phone registered with Proxy Domain Yes Yes 6 Soft phone registered with Proxy IP Yes Yes 7 Soft phone registered with Asterisk domain Yes Yes 8 Soft phone registered with Asterisk IP Yes Yes Here I am dialling *98 with the mentioned scenario, if it goes to voicemail options then Yes, else No I am using ALLO ATA. I have attached my kamailio.cfg with this email. Regards Juned Khan / Network Engineer +91 9974740823/ juned.khan(a)inextrix.com iNextrix Technologies Pvt Ltd. www.inextrix.com <http://htmlsig.com/www.inextrix.com> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/junedkhan23> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/juned23> [image: Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/+JunedKhan> [image: Linkedin] <http://htmlsig.com/in.linkedin.com/in/junedk> This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

1 0

Ro_CCR function
by Shane Harrison 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hi all, In a previous post I was alerted to the (perhaps obvious) fact that that ims_charging module is design to run within an IMS environment: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-January/086675.html I have subsequently attempted to modify the module to work with the standard usrloc Kamailio module. I decided to branch from the 4.2.2 release rather than the master since I was unsure of the state of the ims_charging module in the master. It now compiles fine and installs. I also have the cdp module talking watchdog_requests to a freeDiameter server so at that level things seem OK. However inserting the Ro_CCR() call into the kamailio cfg file shows up some problems, primarily: Feb 2 01:05:52 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[6473]: WARNING: usrloc [dlist.c:624]: register_udomain(): Registering a new domain called 'voip.we-rcs.flowcloud.systems' with usrloc Feb 2 01:05:52 hh-rcs-sipproxy3 /usr/sbin/kamailio[6473]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:443]: db_check_table_version(): invalid version 0 for table voip.we-rcs.flowcloud.systems found, expected 6 (check table structure and table "version") Exploring this error leads me to a few questions: 1) The 4.2.2 Ro_CCR() has the diameter domain as a parameter. The addition of this function to my kamailio.cfg file causes ro_fixup() -> domain_fixup() -> ul.register_domain which as per the log above, attempts to look for a table with the same name as the domain. Is it expected that such a table exists, for standard Kamailio I thought all usrloc records simply go into the Location table , regardless of the domain. 2) What is the purpose of the ro_fixup() 3) I notice that the 4.3 module documentation for ims_charging module has 6 parameters for the function call while the example code given in the same section as only 5 (missing domain). The code from the master branch for the function is different again - not sure if 4.3 is still in quite a bit of flux or not for the ims_charging module? 4) Should I be using 4.3 ims_charging module as a starting point or is 4.2.2 good enough i.e are there major changes? At this stage I am going to create a table for the domain but would like some clarity on how the usrloc and domains relate to table names. Kind regards Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

1 2

Grouped dispatching
by Grant Bagdasarian 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hello, Would the below scenario be possible using the dispatcher module or any other routing module? Destination 1: 192.168.1.1 Destination 2: 192.168.1.2 Destination 3: 172.168.1.1 These three destinations belong to the same distribution group(set), but Kamailio has to do the following: Perform round-robin using destination 1 and 2, but if both are down fail-over to destination 3. I hope I'm being clear enough. Regards, Grant

2 1

Video Key-Frame Request using RTCP FIR or SIP INFO message
by Muhammad Shahzad 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Hi, This may be a bit out of focus topic for this forum but i am posting it here anyway with hope that some guru would shed some light on it and point me to right direction. The problem is that i want to establish video call between a webrtc and a sip client using kamailio (for signalling) and RTPEngine (for media relay). Both signalling and the audio stream seems to work perfectly fine The remote video on webrtc client side (i.e. video stream from sip client) takes about 20-30 seconds to establish but once it starts it works fine. However, the remote video on sip client side (i.e. video stream from webrtc client) starts almost immediately (within 3-5 seconds) but it gets stuck after 1 or 2 seconds, then it goes blank after about 30 seconds. After a long discussion with sip client developer, we now understand the fact that sip client sends a request for so called key-frame, which is ignored by webrtc client. This request is sent through both RTCP stream and SIP INFO message. The SIP INFO message seems to be pointless as media is internally managed by chrome/firefox and these browsers don't give us such sophisticated access and control over media streams. Please let me know if this assumption is wrong. For the RTCP stream based request (RTCP-FIR), i only see "Invalid RTCP packet type" error message in RTPEngine logs (not sure if it drops this packet or relay it anyway). Does anyone has any idea on how can we either, 1. Force WebRTC client (running on Chrome / Firefox) to honor SIP INFO message and issue a key-frame in RTP video stream in response to this SIP request? OR 2. Force RTPEngine to accept RTCP-FIR and issue key-frame in RTP video stream on webrtc client's behalf? If there is any other solution to this, please feel free to share. Thank you.

4 5

What could cause an intermittent fault (28) with http_query()?
by Tim Chubb 01 Feb '15

01 Feb '15

Hi All I seem to be experiencing an intermittent fault with the utils http_query() method. We are implementing a routing and white list component that is accessed via a REST api, however i have observed several occasions where this is logged: Jan 30 16:04:17 vs-kam-prod02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13184]: ERROR: utils [functions.c:149]: http_query(): failed to perform curl (28) The indicated error number (28) seems to suggest a timeout is occurring with curl, however examining a capture of network traffic when this happens shows that a http request is not sent from the server to the destination at all, usually attempting a second call results in everything working correctly. As stated its intermittent in its nature and so I cannot reliably trigger this issue, other than through sheer repetition, so any ideas as to what could be causing this issue would be gratefully received,

2 2

Async module taking down our server
by Will Ferrer 31 Jan '15

31 Jan '15

Hi All We are trying to use the async module to to delay sending a bye on from one end of the call to the other. We are using async_route(routename, seconds) to delay the WITHINDLG route. The idea is that in the future we want to be able to have our billing min duration enforced (though currently we are having issues with the dialog module that we are discussing in another thread). After running this on our deploy servers, the delays before sending on the byes get longer and longer, and then kamailio goes down. Then the receive udp buffer fills up. We tried it with both 4 and 400 async workers, and it made no difference. I am including a screen capture of the servers stats when this happens taken from voip monitor. Here are the relevant parts of the config: ... loadmodule "async.so" ... modparam("async", "workers", ASYNC_THREADS) ... request_route { ... route(DELAYED_BYE_STATIC); ... route[DELAYED_BYE_STATIC] { xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC"); #!ifdef WITH_DELAYED_BYE_STATIC if (is_method("BYE")) { xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, from self \n"); #if (from_uri == myself) { if ((allow_trusted() || allow_source_address()) && from_uri == myself) { xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, Bye detected, from self \n"); send_reply("200", "OK"); xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, sent 200 about to sleep \n"); setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails if (has_totag()) { xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, sleeping to WITHINDLG_DELAYED \n"); async_route("WITHINDLG_DELAYED", MIN_DURATION); } else { xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, sleeping to WITHINDLG \n"); async_route("WITHINDLG", MIN_DURATION); } xlog("L_DEBUG","route DELAYED_BYE_STATIC, slept\n"); exit; } } #!endif return; } ... route[WITHINDLG_DELAYED] { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG_DELAYED: triggered \n"); $avp(was_delayed) = 1; route(WITHINDLG); } ... route[WITHINDLG] { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG triggered, request method: $rm \n"); #!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER if(is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) { xlog("L_DEBUG","route WITHINDLG: cancel or bye detected, request method: $rm \n"); #!ifdef WITH_DISPATCHER_LOAD_AWARE xlog("L_DEBUG","route WITHINDLG: running ds_load_update, request method: $rm \n"); ds_load_update(); #dlg_get ("$ci","$ft","$tt"); #dlg_bye ("all"); #!endif } #!endif if (has_totag() || $avp(was_delayed) == 1) { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG has totag or was_delayed: $avp(was_delayed) \n"); # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG has loose route \n"); route(DLGURI); if (is_method("BYE")) { xlog("L_DEBUG","route WITHINDLG: BYE detected"); setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails xlog("L_DEBUG","route WITHINDLG: ACC flag set"); } else if ( is_method("ACK") ) { # ACK is forwarded statelessy route(NATMANAGE); } else if ( is_method("NOTIFY") ) { # Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per RFC 6665. record_route(); } xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG RELAY 1\n"); route(RELAY); } else { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG else \n"); if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(PRESENCE); exit; } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG is ack \n"); if ( t_check_trans() ) { xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG t_check_trans \n"); # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be an ACK after a 487 # or e.g. 404 from upstream server xlog("L_DEBUG", "route WITHINDLG: will -- DLG RELAY 2\n"); route(RELAY); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } ... Does any one know if this is a bug or a leak with in the async module, or perhaps something I am doing in my config? Thanks in advance for an assistance you can offer me. All the best. Will Ferrer Switchsoft

3 5

Dispatcher weight dont work
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hello I use dipatcher algorithm 8 that works with weight. I added 2 Asterisks and try to call its with my kam.We use 4.3 version. Tthis config select needed dst from database with my scenario. if(!ds_select_dst("$var(setid)", "8")) $var(setid)- is variable for setting setid that i get from database with my own scenario. IT does not matter. When running asterisk with weight 90 - all calls goes through it. When I starting asterisk with weight 10 -calls going through asterisk 90. When I shut down asterisk with weight 90 -calls goes through asterisk 10? but when i start asterisk weight 90 all calls goes through sterisk 10 until I shut down it. root@Kamailio:~# kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.0-dev3 (x86_64/linux) 8cdbe7 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 8cdbe7 compiled on 01:17:56 Jan 21 2015 with gcc 4.8.2 id setid destination flags priority attrs 1 2 sip:34.25.123.45:506000 0 weight=10 2 2 sip:10.0.1.6:506000 0weight=90 modparam("dispatcher", "db_url",DBURL) modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid") modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination") modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(i:272)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@10.0.1.1") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes", "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3") modparam("tm", "reparse_on_dns_failover", 0) Thanks

2 3

NDB_REDIS password to REDIS remote DB
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hello. I try to use NDB_REDIS with remote REDIS DB and can not to connect because remote DB use password, but Kamailio module have no any variable or attr of modparam that implenets password for DB. How I can connect to my REDIS?

3 5

why do not support tcp:eth1:5062，only support eht1:5062
by 张顺通 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

why do not support tcp:eth1:5062，only support eht1:5062? I need to bind on eth1 only tcp.

2 6

tls_port_no maybe do not work
by 张顺通 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

I set cfg like this: tls_port_no=9004 listen=bond0:9002 but result is: udp: 10.232.98.23 [10.232.98.23]:9002 tcp: 10.232.98.23 [10.232.98.23]:9002 tls: 10.232.98.23 [10.232.98.23]:9003

1 0

Wrong location entries when using usrloc with Mongo
by Mickael Marrache 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hi, I start with no location nor in Mongo, nor in memory. My UA registers successfully and I can see the location entry in Mongo. Then, I close my UA which unregisters (by setting Expires header to 0). Then, I open the app again and a new registration is made. The entry after first registration. Looks okay. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:55:34Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8809, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip:XXXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip:XXXXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp:XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:55:34Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-3378-2", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The same entry after un register (Expires 0). Note that the username field is missing. In any case, I expected the entry to be deleted. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } The entries after second registration. The new entry looks okay. But, the old entry is still here. { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb38f684e58133783f2b42"), "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:56:51Z"), "q" : -1, "cseq" : 8811, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T07:56:51Z"), "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0, "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp" } { "_id" : ObjectId("54cb3a7884e581337a25b895"), "username" : "A", "contact" : "sip:A@192.168.1.3:54217;rinstance=DFAEBBC7;transport=tcp", "expires" : ISODate("2015-01-30T09:02:00Z"), "q" : -1, "callid" : "297EC55073A07BF78F0C05822A6CCDFB47E48705", "cseq" : 8813, "flags" : 0, "cflags" : 0, "user_agent" : "Acrobits Softphone Business/3.1", "received" : "sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217;transport=tcp", "path" : "<sip: XXXXXXXXX;lr;received=sip: XXXXXXXXX:54217%3Btransport%3Dtcp>", "socket" : "udp: XXXXXXXXX:5060", "methods" : 4751, "last_modified" : ISODate("2015-01-30T08:02:00Z"), "ruid" : "uloc-54cb38df-337a-1", "instance" : null, "reg_id" : 0 } The issue is the entry is not deleted after un registering. I precise that registrations are dispatched over multiple registrars with all accesses the same Mongo cluster. Thanks, Mickael

1 0

Can kamailio generate a PRACK
by Rahul MathuR 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hello, I was wondering whether Kamailio (as proxy) can generate a PRACK on its own ( since one of the custom written dialer is not sending PRACK) ? Is there any way I can achieve this ? -- Warm Regds. MathuRahul

2 1

Core dump while saving user location in mongo
by Mickael Marrache 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hi, When my proxy receives a REGISTER request, it crashes while saving the user location in MongoDB. This is the backtrace from the core dump: #0 0x0000003f08e32625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x0000003f08e33e05 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00000000006196f9 in fm_free (qm=0x7f4368bf7010, p=0x210add0, file=0x7f4367fd7608 "<core>: db_res.c", func=0x7f4367fd8100 "db_free_columns", line=86) at mem/f_malloc.c:588 #3 0x00007f4367fc37ab in db_free_columns (_r=0x7f4368ca0430) at db_res.c:86 #4 0x00007f4367fc479e in db_free_result (_r=0x7f4368ca0430) at db_res.c:134 #5 0x00007f4367da37cb in db_mongodb_free_result (_h=0x7f4368c94718, _r=0x7f4368ca0430) at mongodb_dbase.c:646 #6 0x00007f4367da5d65 in db_mongodb_query (_h=0x7f4368c94718, _k=0x7fffa03d5550, _op=0x0, _v=0x7fffa03d5510, _c=0x7fffa03d5560, _n=1, _nc=16, _o=0x7f4365ed2c80, _r=0x7fffa03d5508) at mongodb_dbase.c:783 #7 0x00007f4365cac7d2 in db_load_urecord (_c=0x7f4368c94718, _d=0x7f436154a0e8, _aor=0x7fffa03d59d0) at udomain.c:601 #8 0x00007f4365cb1e8e in get_urecord (_d=0x7f436154a0e8, _aor=0x7fffa03d59d0, _r=0x7fffa03d5760) at udomain.c:1106 #9 0x00007f4365a75dea in add_contacts (_m=0x7f4368cbdc40, _d=0x7f436154a0e8, _a=0x7fffa03d59d0, _mode=1, _use_regid=1) at save.c:832 #10 0x00007f4365a77d32 in save (_m=0x7f4368cbdc40, _d=0x7f436154a0e8, _cflags=4, _uri=0x0) at save.c:986 #11 0x00007f4365a606db in w_save2 (_m=0x7f4368cbdc40, _d=0x7f436154a0e8 "H\240TaC\177", _cflags=0x4 <Address 0x4 out of bounds>) at reg_mod.c:447 #12 0x000000000041d489 in do_action (h=0x7fffa03d6180, a=0x7f4368c71e98, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1100 #13 0x0000000000429a7a in run_actions (h=0x7fffa03d6180, a=0x7f4368c71e98, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1583 #14 0x000000000042a0df in run_actions_safe (h=0x7fffa03d7470, a=0x7f4368c71e98, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1648 #15 0x0000000000540b7c in rval_get_int (h=0x7fffa03d7470, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40, i=0x7fffa03d6658, rv=0x7f4368c72830, cache=0x0) at rvalue.c:924 #16 0x0000000000544db4 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fffa03d7470, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40, res=0x7fffa03d6658, rve=0x7f4368c72828) at rvalue.c:1918 #17 0x00000000005451aa in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fffa03d7470, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40, res=0x7fffa03d6ae0, rve=0x7f4368c72070) at rvalue.c:1926 #18 0x000000000041ce4e in do_action (h=0x7fffa03d7470, a=0x7f4368c73148, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1064 #19 0x0000000000429a7a in run_actions (h=0x7fffa03d7470, a=0x7f4368c71cc0, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1583 #20 0x0000000000419dea in do_action (h=0x7fffa03d7470, a=0x7f4368c3bdb8, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:712 #21 0x0000000000429a7a in run_actions (h=0x7fffa03d7470, a=0x7f4368c33898, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40) at action.c:1583 #22 0x000000000042a1a7 in run_top_route (a=0x7f4368c33898, msg=0x7f4368cbdc40, c=0x0) at action.c:1669 #23 0x000000000050747e in receive_msg ( buf=0xa6f780 "REGISTER sip:XXXXXXXXXXXX:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP XXXXXXXXX;branch=z9hG4bK242c.26de52a75c8675f6757e0958454a0ad5.0;i=1\r\nv: SIP/2.0/TCP XXXXXXXXXX:62051;received=XXXXXXXX"..., len=1004, rcv_info=0x7fffa03d7760) at receive.c:216 #24 0x0000000000606e76 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:521 #25 0x00000000004a5c97 in main_loop () at main.c:1629 #26 0x00000000004aaf2a in main (argc=13, argv=0x7fffa03d7b78) at main.c:2561 I tested multiple times, it occurs everytime. Let me know if you need more information. Thanks, Mickael

2 6

Does forking impact max_inv_lifetime?
by Alex Balashov 30 Jan '15

30 Jan '15

Hi, In this serial forking-based failover scenario UAC --> Proxy --> UAS 1 UAS 2 ... UAS 3 I've got a requirement to terminate the call and return an error to the UAC if there is no final response within 60 seconds. The usual fr_inv_timer / restart_fr_on_each_reply combination won't do, because even when restart_fr_on_each_reply == 0, the timer is still restarted on provisional replies of increasing response code value (e.g. 183 after 180). As the documentation states, fr_inv_timer is a branch-level construct anyway, so this approach doesn't make sense here. That's why I looked into max_inv_lifetime. However, when I set it to 60000, I still get the same result, but only when there are new branches being formed on the proxy -> UAS side. It works fine if there is no forking and a single gateway does not provide a final reply within 60 seconds. So, my sense is that the max_inv_lifetime timeout is reset when a new branch is created to UAS 2...UAS N. Is this accurate? Thanks, -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

2 6

gruu within dialog
by samuel 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi all, I'm having some issues treating requests within dialogs with gruu enabled with kamailio 4.1.2. I've got the "standard" configuration of WITHIN route with the adition of the next lines: if(is_gruu()){ route(LOCATION); }; before the the RELAY route call in the loose_route section. The "problem" is that the ACK with a pub-gruu on the Req-URI is not properly lookup. In the logs I can see the following statements: 2(4232) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:123]: lookup(): looking up pub gruu [urn:uuid:d63b1c4f-d7dc-4f4e-87f1-948123266dc0] 2(4232) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:158]: lookup(): 'sam(a)A.B.C.D' Not found in usrloc Where A.B.C.D is the local IP of the UA. Looking at the code, this last line looks like is looking for the "standard" URI (username@domain) instead of using the pub gruu. Am I right with this assumption or am I missing something from the code? As far as I could look, it looks like there's an exit -1 statement in the line 158 of lookup.c which disables the following gruu treatment. Since the username with IP is not registered, this ACK is lost and the sesion is not stablished (lost ACK). Can anyone provide some hints why is this failing? Thanks a lot in advance! Samuel.

3 8

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users