sr-users September 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

46 participants
60 discussions

Info: Kamailio World 2021 starting soon - live stream

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, to sync better on time, Kamailio World 2021 online edition is starting in about 2 hours from now (12:50 UTC Welcome and 13:00UTC the first session) - the agenda is available at: * https://kamailioworld.com/k09-online/ In short: participation is free, no registration is needed. The sessions are live streamed to YouTube KamailioWorld channel: * https://www.youtube.com/c/KamailioWorld/ YouTube chat next to the live stream can be used for addressing questions to speakers -- we will monitor it and ask the speaker inside the video conferencing room. For community interaction via text chatting, you can join the Matrix room #kamailio:matrix.kamailio.dev : * https://riot.kamailio.dev/#/room/#kamailio:matrix.kamailio.dev Questions for speakers can also be addressed in this chat room. If anyone wants to participate in the live video conferencing room, the URL is: * https://meet.kamailioworld.com/live Just note that we may have to limit the number of participants in the live session in order to ensure proper streaming quality. See you soon online! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 years, 7 months

RPC usrloc ul.add problem

by Pepelux

Hi all I have problems adding a new location by RPC command. *# kamailio -v* version: kamailio 5.5.0 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 A simple example, adding an AOR which expires in 1 hour: *# date ; kamcmd ul.add kam_location 1002-test1(a)sipserver.com <1002-test1(a)sipserver.com> sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> 3600 0.0 . 0 0 0 .* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:00 PM CEST Location record has been inserted correctly: *# date ; kamcmd ul.dump | grep test -A24* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:02 PM CEST AoR: 1002-test1(a)sipserver.com HashID: -597689288 Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 Expires: 3598 Q: 0.000000 Call-ID: dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.rpc CSeq: 1 User-Agent: kamailio SIP Router - RPC Server Received: [not set] Path: [not set] State: CS_SYNC Flags: 0 CFlags: 0 Socket: [not set] Methods: 0 Ruid: ulcx-61389f47-2e44-01 Instance: [not set] Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: 0 Keepalive: 0 Last-Keepalive: 1631102280 KA-Roundtrip: 0 Last-Modified: 0 } } } But a few seconds later, the location record has gone: * # date ; kamcmd ul.dump | grep test -A24* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:26 PM CEST In kamailio logs I can see that: * Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:637]: ul_rpc_add(): path == 0 -> unset Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:652]: ul_rpc_add(): ret: 10 table:kam_location aor:1002-test1@sipserver.com <aor%3A1002-test1(a)sipserver.com> contact:sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <contact%3Asip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> expires:3600 dtemp:0.000000 path: flags:0 bflags:0 methods:0 Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:660]: ul_rpc_add(): q:0 Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1868]: uldb_insert_attrs(): no location attributes* Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes * Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:377]: wb_timer(): tcp connection has been lost, expiring contact sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:387]: wb_timer(): Binding '1002-test1(a)sipserver.com <1002-test1(a)sipserver.com>','sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82>' has expired Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes* Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes What am I doing wrong? It is supposed that the connection is by UDP. I also tried to insert the socket value as UDP, but it had the same problem. Thanks!

2 years, 7 months

Topos does not add record-route on invite

by Angelo Sipper

Hello, We have the following setup on Kamailio 5.3.7 (x86_64/linux) and I am trying to use topos module on Kamailio2 in order to hide our topology but, mostly to reduce the invite size as most of the times we have fragmentation on invites from Kamailio1 as Kamailio1 it adds 2 record-routes and two via as it handles TLS from one side and UDP on the other side and we have found no wat to avoid all this info even with topos enabled on Kamailio1 there is no change on this. UA (OverTLS) -> Kamailio1 (Over UDP)-> Kamailio2 (Over UDP)-> Provider UA :50.50.50.50:5065 (TLS) Kamailio1: 170.170.170.210:5061 (TLS),170.170.170.210:5060 (UDP) Kamailio2: 170.170.170.170:5060 (UDP) Provider: 200.200.200.193:5060 (UDP) Kamailio1 does not run topos. Kamailio2 does run topos and rr with bellow settings: # ------ topos ------ modparam("topos", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("topos", "mask_callid", 0) modparam("topos", "sanity_checks", 0) modparam("topos", "branch_expire", 130) # 3 Min modparam("topos", "dialog_expire", 10800) # 3 Hours modparam("topos", "clean_interval", 60) modparam("topos", "event_mode", 3) modparam("topos", "contact_host", " sbc181.myserver.com") # ----- rr params ----- # set next param to 1 to add value to ;lr param (helps with some UAs) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 0) modparam("rr", "ignore_sips", 1) # 0 = do not append from tag to the RR, 0 = append from tag to the RR modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 0) # dual RR 0 = No, 1 = Yes when needed 2 = Always modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 0) The problem is that on the invite from Kamailio2 to provider, topos adds only VIA kai new contact. No record route at all. So the provider sends multiple 200 ok SDPs to wrong IPs. If I disable topos module on kamailio2 everything works fine except that we have huge invite as another VIA and another record route is added having now three of each and fragmentation is present. *Invite from Kamailio1 to Kamailio2* ------------------------------------------------- 2021/09/08 21:41:57.698823 170.170.170.210:5060 -> 170.170.170.181:5060 INVITE sip:1234567890@sip.myserver.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:170.170.170.210;r2=on;lr;ftag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgEBBwEAAXABAG5BR0EAQUBCZXJ2b2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAoMDgsBBQcGAgIAdENbQG4AFxNUXAUaGQYXWAocY2UuZXU-;did=ff2.96a;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:170.170.170.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgEBBwEAAXABAG5BR0EAQUBCZXJ2b2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAoMDgsBBQcGAgIAdENbQG4AFxNUXAUaGQYXWAocY2UuZXU-;did=ff2.96a;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 170.170.170.210;branch=z9hG4bKd703.e095cdba1da1a4b1599119c9135b7838.0;i=8eb41 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 50.50.50.50:5065 ;received=50.50.50.50;rport=31090;branch=z9hG4bKPj9196e5f9-977c-4a53-a4c0-c0ab82b095da;alias From: 987654321 <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com >;tag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e To: <sip: 1234567890(a)sip.myserver.com> Contact: <sip:customer1@50.50.50.50:5065 ;transport=TLS;alias=50.50.50.50~31090~3> Call-ID: cd64414e-77d5-45b4-a52d-74ec7fb5c7ef CSeq: 15776 INVITE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Max-Forwards: 69 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 231 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com> v=0 o=- 391641952 391641952 IN IP4 170.170.170.216 s=Asterisk c=IN IP4 170.170.170.216 t=0 0 m=audio 29478 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:29479 a=ptime:20 *Invite from Kamailio2 to Provider* ------------------------------------------------- 2021/09/08 21:41:57.715881 170.170.170.181:5060 -> 200.200.200.193:5060 INVITE sip: 1234567890@sbc181.myserver.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 170.170.170.181;branch=z9hG4bKd703.d45db1fd910c43c5e7c4f8711a5fca92.0 From: 987654321 <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com >;tag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e To: <sip:1234567890@sip.myserver.com> Call-ID: cd64414e-77d5-45b4-a52d-74ec7fb5c7ef CSeq: 15776 INVITE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Max-Forwards: 68 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 231 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com> Contact: <sip:btpsh-c9-613903ef-21d75-1@sbc181.myserver.com> v=0 o=- 391641952 391641952 IN IP4 170.170.170.184 s=Asterisk c=IN IP4 170.170.170.184 t=0 0 m=audio 11450 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:11451 a=ptime:20 *Bellow you can see the flow* ---------------------------------------- 170.170.170.210:5060 170.170.170.170:5060 200.200.200.193:5060 qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq 21:41:57.698823 x INVITE (SDP) x x +0.003788 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x 21:41:57.702611 x 100 trying -- your call is x x +0.013270 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:41:57.715881 x x INVITE (SDP) x +0.018529 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:41:57.734410 x x 100 Trying x +0.804083 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:58.538493 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.014557 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:58.553050 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +0.483907 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:41:59.036957 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.012009 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:59.048966 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +0.988036 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:00.037002 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.010960 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:00.047962 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +1.989085 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:02.037047 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.010947 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:02.047994 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +3.989064 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:06.037058 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.008860 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:06.045918 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +1.178240 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.224158 x CANCEL x x +0.002725 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x 21:42:07.226883 x x CANCEL x +0.000372 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:42:07.227255 x 200 canceling x x +0.016902 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.244157 x x 200 OK x +0.004590 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:07.248747 x x 487 Request Terminated x +0.003547 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:07.252294 x x ACK x +0.003737 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:42:07.256031 x 487 Request Terminated x x +0.001161 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.257192 x ACK x x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x TCP is out of question from the provider. Any help to use topos or any other module to reduce the size of our invites to avoid fragmentation will be much appreciated! Regards, Angelo

2 years, 7 months

manually append_branch to lookup result

by David Villasmil

Hello guys, I'm trying to dynamically add a branch after doing lookup. The user is found, but in some cases I need to add a branch and do parallel forking. So i'm basically doing: route[LOCATION] { if (!lookup("location")) { .... } if (something) { route(BRANCH_TO_EXTRA); } route(RELAY); } route[BRANCH_TO_EXTRA] { $fs = MY_SOCKET; append_branch("sip:$tU@" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_port)); return; } For some reason only the branch appended is being used (I have append_branches=1) Ideas? David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 years, 7 months

via header not removed wit hremove_hf()

by Richard Robson

during testing I need to remove a Via header This is the code snippet route[REPLACE_VIA] { xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n"); xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n"); if(remove_hf("Via")) { xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n"); } else { xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] did not remove Via\n"); } xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n"); and this is the logs output Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_RURI] Start of block Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] Start of block Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] removed Via Sep 7 08:00:00 INFO: _LOG: 3a547f956d65fe985ba189916047fc320ae150ad: [REPLACE_VIA] 1 Via headers From the logs it looks like the remove_hf returns true and we have the header removed, but its still counting the Via header and the Via Header is still present when the INVIE is releyed on Regards, Richard

2 years, 7 months

Kamailio and robotics repo

by Yuriy Gorlichenko

Following the promise during the Kamailio world 2021 I share the source code of the Kamailoi and robotics repo: https://github.com/arigativa/robolive

2 years, 7 months

Manage multiple RTP streams with different TO-tags (forking)

by B. Tietz

Hello, following situation. I have a Kamailio (5.4) using rtpengine to loadbalance calls. If a call from Alice comes in, Kamailio decides to send the call to Carrier B from Bob. Bobs Phone is ringing and the carrier B send a 183 Session Progress with SDP and To-tag=abcd. The SDP has G722 as codec and port 1234. A few moments later carrier B send a second 183 Session Progress with SDP and TO-tag=fghi. The SDP has G711 as codec and port 5678. This is done, to play some funky music as ringtone -.- If Bob answers the call, carrier B sends a 200 OK WITHOUT SDP and TO-tag=abcd. So this should instruct our Kamailio to switch to the first G722 and port 1234. But sadly, this is just not working as expected. We tried to set the flags media-handover and port-latching for the rtpengine options and additionally set a to-tag when using rtpenging_manage. But this doesn't solve the codec change, so we have only audio when Bob answers the call, but no ringtone-music. If we allow G711 only in the outgoing INVITE to Bob, we have also tha ringtone-muisic, because there is no codec-change. Carrier B tells us, they are using a fork-mechanism. Is there something we can do, to support the codec change in 183? Or enforce carrier B to send SDP in 200 OK? Or anything else? Carrier B can not change anything in the ringtone-music-backend. They are stuck on G711. Thanks!

2 years, 7 months

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

by Huber Andreas

Hi, We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon. Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate ! Thanks, Andreas From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. Regards, Federico On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas <andreas.huber(a)nagra.com<mailto:andreas.huber@nagra.com>> wrote: Hello, We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE. We’d like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect. The doc states that t_drop_replies() is only working if a new branch is added. And from my understanding t_suspend() adds a new branch. But is it possible that t_drop_replies() cannot be used with t_suspend()? Or am I missing something? Kind Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 years, 7 months

How to drop negative final response and send ACK

by Koray Vatansever

Hi, I have a problem with the following scenario: I have web and mobile sip clients for the same username. If both clients are idle, INVITE is forked and both clients ring. If web client is busy and mobile client is online and registered, the mobile client rings and the caller hears ringback tone. If web client is busy and mobile client is offline, before the mobile client receives push notification and registers, web client sends 486 busy response and caller hears busy tone. In this last scenario, I want to wait some time for the mobile client to register and ring. I tried to drop 486 response in onreply_route[x], but I found that final responses cannot be dropped in this route. I dropped 486 in reply_route, but I couldn't send an ACK for this transaction. Is there a way to implement this scenario? I would appreciate if you have any suggestions. Thanks, Koray

2 years, 7 months

dns_srv_lb on or yes

by Juha Heinanen

Wiki tells: dns_srv_lb = yes | no (default no) and doc/tutorials/dns.txt tells: dns_srv_lb = on | off Which one is correct or does it matter? -- Juha

2 years, 7 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2021