Hello Kamailions,
I'm running into the following challenge.
A kamailio setup where phones register with their mac address as uid and
a password.
Users have to login to the system by dialing a special number where they
have to enter their internal extension and a pin code.
Now the system knows which extension(number) is logged in on which
phone(macaddress). This is done with from updates, just a type of
hotdesking.
Now I want to use presence....
When a phone makes a phone call, kamailio generates a publish message
where the "local" part of the xml code contains the mac address.
How can I manipulate the Publish xml information? I mean the
manipulation can be done with textops, but which variables to use and
where in the configuration?
Im asking because when I disable the presence route and do not call it
in my configuration, but with presence enabled, I still get Publish
messages....
I have tried adding a Sender header which contains the "extension" of
the phone and then call the publish in the PRESENCE route like this:
handle_publish("$hdr(Sender)");
But this does not change the xml information.
Am I doing things wrong?
Below the first publish message that is send, where 10.88.77.172 is the
kamailio server.
U 2019/06/26 14:54:37.233345 10.88.77.172:5060 -> 10.88.77.172:5060 #7
PUBLISH sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.88.77.172;branch=z9hG4bK1a87.5510d093000000000000000000000000.0.
To: <sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060>.
From:
<sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060>;tag=a2652bb825a097f3b7285d4c70edd51a-5c5d.
CSeq: 10 PUBLISH.
Call-ID: 173009c21f4e3c77-94480(a)10.88.77.172.
Content-Length: 579.
User-Agent: kamailio (5.1.8 (x86_64/linux)).
Max-Forwards: 70.
Event: dialog.
Expires: 125.
Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml.
.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dialog-info xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info" version="0"
state="full" entity="sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060">
<dialog id="0_2285997339(a)10.88.77.184"
call-id="0_2285997339(a)10.88.77.184" direction="initiator">
<state>Trying</state>
<remote>
<identity>sip:604113@10.88.77.172:5060</identity>
<target uri="sip:604113@10.88.77.172:5060"/>
</remote>
<local>
<identity>sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060</identity>
<target uri="sip:0015659a9931@10.88.77.172:5060"/>
</local>
</dialog>
</dialog-info>
I would like to change the local identity and target uri into the
extension assigned to that phone, for example 604114....
So that subscribers to the extension 604114 get informed about the state
of the phone with the used uid 0015659a9931.
Feedback would be appricated. Pointers to where I am going wrong as
well, ... that's feedback too.
Rgds,
Gertjan
Hello,
we're using topos/redis since some time and it's working quite well for most situations. It's used to route asterisk traffic to sip providers.
Some providers, however, are validating the contact header strictly against i.e. the accounts username and so we have to disable topos by using event_route[topos:msg-sending].
Now i'm wondering if it would be useful to other people to add a mode to topos where the topos uid is not forwarded as contact username but instead added as a contact uri param.
So instead of e.g. Contact: <sip:btpsh-5abcdef5-374-1@x.x.x.x:5060;transport=tcp> it would use Contact: <sip:+49......@x.x.x.x:5060;transport=tcp;line=btpsh-5abcdef5-374-1>.
What do you think? Would it make sense? Is it a lot of effort?
Cheers,
Thomas
Hello,
later today I will join ClueCon Weekly for a discussion about what is
new for Kamailio project and the plans for the future.
ClueCon Weekly is a web video conference organized by the FreeSwitch
project team. They announced recently a revamp of the format, however, I
expect that other people can still join live if they want to listen and
ask questions, couple of ways to connect being listed at:
*
https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/ClueCon+Weekly+Confere…
If joining live is no longer possible, I will post a link to the
recording and if someone has any questions following my presentation, I
can answer here.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Hello
i'm facing a dependency error when trying to install kamailio 5.2.3+xenial
with carrier route module
using apt package installer
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kamailio-carrierroute-modules : Depends: kamailio (= 4.3.4-1.1ubuntu2) but
5.2.3+xenial is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
all other modules installed fine
any suggestions?
thanks in advance
Hi team!
I’ve recently found an issue in my Kamailio setup. It appears when the trunk replies to call in progress with a BYE, we relay it immediately back to them:
https://i.imgur.com/h5fusau.png <https://i.imgur.com/h5fusau.png>
The only differences in the second BYE is the Route header is removed and replaced with a Via header referencing the Kamailio machine, and the From URI is rewritten to show the Kamailio hostname.
I’m unsure what steps I can take here, as all of my out of dialog messages (180, 200, ACK) are forwarded along with no issue. It seems only the in dialog are having this issue.
Here’s my WITHINDLG and RELAY:
def ksr_route_relay()
if KSR.is_method_in("IBSU") then
if KSR::TM.t_is_set("branch_route") < 0 then
KSR::TM.t_on_branch("ksr_branch_manage")
end
end
if KSR.is_method_in("ISU") then
if KSR::TM.t_is_set("onreply_route") < 0 then
KSR::TM.t_on_reply("ksr_onreply_manage")
end
#KSR.info("Onreply route: #{KSR::TM.t_is_set("onreply_route")}")
end
if KSR.is_INVITE() then
if KSR::TM.t_is_set("failure_route") < 0 then
KSR::TM.t_on_failure("ksr_failure_manage")
end
end
if KSR::TM.t_relay() < 0 then
KSR::SL.sl_reply_error()
end
exit
end
def ksr_route_withindlg()
return if KSR::SIPUTILS.has_totag() < 0
if KSR::RR.loose_route() > 0 then
ksr_route_dlguri()
if KSR.is_BYE() then
#KSR.setflag($myenv['FLT_ACC'].to_i)
#KSR.setflag($myenv['FLT_ACCFAILED'].to_i)
elsif KSR.is_ACK() then
ksr_route_natmanage()
elsif KSR.is_NOTIFY() then
KSR::RR.record_route()
end
ksr_route_relay()
exit
end
if KSR.is_ACK() then
#KSR.info("Handling an ACK within dialog")
if KSR::TM.t_check_trans() > 0 then
ksr_route_relay()
exit
else
exit
end
end
#KSR.info("404ing within dialog")
KSR::SL.sl_send_reply(404, "Not here");
exit
end
I suspect I must be sending this to the wrong branch somehow, but I’m unsure how to correct this. The call gets originally initiated from Kamailio writing a custom RURI and To header before calling t_relay(). I’m wondering if I’m somehow initiating the dialog incorrectly and as such the BYE doesn’t know where to go.
Thanks!
Andrew
Hi all,
For a few times now I've noticed Kamailio 5.2.3 dispatcher module looses
view of setid destination and this system been up and running for 13 days:
root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.list | grep ash.tpgw.service
To work around it, we have to reload the module again:
root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.reload
root:~# kamcmd dispatcher.list | grep ash.tpgw.service
URI: sip:<some host>:5062
URI: sip:<some host>:5060
root:~#
Process been running for several days:
root:~# ps -elf | grep kam
0 S root 8484 6520 0 80 0 - 3714 pipe_w 16:04 pts/0 00:00:00 grep
--color=auto kam
5 S kamailio 32086 1 0 80 0 - 214845 pause Jun17 ? 00:00:00
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32164 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32165 32086 0 80 0 - 233342 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32166 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32167 32086 0 80 0 - 233341 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:02
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32168 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32169 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
1 S kamailio 32170 32086 0 80 0 - 214875 skb_wa Jun17 ? 00:00:00
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -u kamailio -g kamailio
Anyone seen this?
Thanks
--
Andy Chen
Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer
achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com
--
*Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any
attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or
any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the
contents to any other person. Thank you.*
Im trying to use kamailio with websocket and tls. It will be use as registrar for websocket clients.
I'm using default config with additional websocket, https and tls modules. I created some certs for it and everething looks like good.
But when I started kamailio via (systemctl start kamailio) I get some errors
июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:205]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984
июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2753]: tcp_init(): added 37.143.9.210:443
июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2855]: tcp_init(): bind(9, 0x7fb6ef026f84, 16) on 37.143.9.210:443 : Permission denied
июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) ERROR: tls [tls_init.c:342]: tls_h_init_si(): Error while initializing TCP part of TLS socket 37.143.9.210:443
июн 04 15:00:52 p534507.kvmvps kamailio[23502]: 0(23502) DEBUG: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1986]: mod_destroy(): rtpengine_hash_table_destroy() success!
If I start it via /usr/sbin/kamailio - all work.
What I do wrong?
--
Олег Подгуйко
Good morning List!
I have an issue with my kamcmd from kamailio 5.2.3 on CentOS 7.6 with
kamailio-rpms.
The kamcmd util can not find my registrations via command
kamcmd uac.reg_enable auth_username FFFFFFFFFFFF
kamcmd uac.reg_info l_username +49XXXXXXXX
and soone. Only global commands for uac works.
Whats going wrong with my kamcmd? Any ideas? Thank for your hints!
# kamcmd uac.reg_dump
{
l_uuid: 49XXXXXXX
l_username: +49XXXXXXXX
l_domain: sip-trunk.telekom.de
r_username: +49XXXXXXXX
r_domain: sip-trunk.telekom.de
realm: sip-trunk.telekom.de
auth_username: FFFFFFFFFFFF
auth_password: ***************
auth_proxy: sip:reg.sip-trunk.telekom.de
expires: 360
flags: 20
diff_expires: 129
timer_expires: 1561103682
reg_init: 1561101919
reg_delay: 3
}
# kamcmd uac.reg_enable auth_username FFFFFFFFFFFF
error: 404 - Record not found
--
Kind regards
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
*Karsten Horsmann*
