if I send my kamailio.cfg file can you edit it to me please because it is
so urgent
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:06 PM <sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Send sr-users mailing list submissions to
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sr-users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: TOPOS uid in contact param instead of username
> (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
> 2. Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak)
> 3. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module
> (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
> 4. Statistics for locally generated replies (Duarte Rocha)
> 5. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module
> (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
> 6. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak)
> 7. Re: kamailio as UAC and NAPTR / sendsocket question
> (Karsten Horsmann)
> 8. MongoDB for Kamailio (Gaurav Bmotra)
> 9. Presence publish manipulation (Gertjan Wolzak)
> 10. Re: Question about registrar behavior
> (Володимир Іванець)
> 11. Re: MongoDB for Kamailio (Henning Westerholt)
> 12. Re: DMQ: dmq_t_replicate() (Henning Westerholt)
> 13. Re: does kamailio support graph database ?? (Henning Westerholt)
> 14. Re: Question about registrar behavior (Henning Westerholt)
> 15. Need help with "no branches for forwarding" message (Andrew Chen)
> 16. Topos / Remove HF_re (Nicolas Breuer)
> 17. Re: Kamailio 5.x and Call_control module (Efelin Novak)
> 18. Re: Question about registrar behavior
> (Володимир Іванець)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:52:05 +0200
> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
> <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS uid in contact param instead of username
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAFRry4VMJd9aaJ_teWd3E-CYg-O9K+qutW699n9GDc9is7wAxQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello,
> ok, feel free to ask question if something is not clear ... and I think
> topoh might help looking at its code, iirc, it uses uri param for contact
> masking ...
>
> Anyhow, there is no better fun that C coding ;-) ...
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:12 AM Thomas Weber <thomas.weber(a)pascom.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > thank you for your opinions.
> >
> > So i will give it a try throughout the next weeks because we have some
> > customer pressure here.
> > Didn't do a C project since some 10 years, so it could be fun to "learn
> it
> > again".
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
Hello,
The prack is for the initial INVITE establishing the call. No re-INVITE
messages are generated in the dialog.
--Olli
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:35:09 +0200
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
<sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio next_state_dlg(): bogus event
Message-ID:
<CAFRry4XAF5qYqRxgJA4tzsuUt-56ON1KnzzwvJnxeKOdTUaxSA(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello,
is the PRACK following a re-INVITE or is for the initial INVITE
establishing the call?
Cheers,
Daniel
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:13 AM Olli Attila <attiolli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting this error in Kamailio log every now and then. Can anyone
> suggest methods to debug this further for root cause?
>
> Jun 27 10:04:09 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26341]: CRITICAL: dialog
> [dlg_hash.c:1098]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 5 in state 4 for dlg
> 0x7fceeabf8d38 [749:3185] with clid
> 'SDceked01-e4d2e93d7f9ffe88907206a25ccdbcc2-v300g00030' and tags
> 'SDceked01-ecd4281b' '14001358846426'
>
> Behaviour in the call:
> When I look at the SIP flow from this call I can see that a PRACK
> message which is routed to Kamailio gets discarded (=the proxy does
> not route the PRACK onwards to the UA that requested the usage of the
> 100rel in 183 session progress message.) The PRACK message itself
> seems valid and when compared to a PRACK from a working call, there is
> no difference in the content.
>
> Cheers,
> Olli
I have an htable that loads from mysql. The data loads fine on startup but
disappears on expiry. If I issue kamcmd htable.reload it loads again until
expiry. It seems as if db_expires is not taking affect. I see them expiring
in the debug log but not an errors. Mysql general log does not show any
attempt to connect on expiry. Another odd thing is that if I set the
expires column in db to anything other than 0 the data doesn't load at all.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
modparam("htable", "timer_interval", 10)
modparam("htable", "htable",
"h=>size=20;autoexpire=20;dbtable=validdomains;updateexpire=0;")
modparam("htable", "db_url", AUTHDBURL)
modparam("htable", "db_expires", 1)
create or replace view validdomains as select distinct subscriber.domain as
key_name, 1 as key_value, 0 as key_type, 0 as value_type, 0 as expires from
subscriber;
Hello,
I'm getting this error in Kamailio log every now and then. Can anyone
suggest methods to debug this further for root cause?
Jun 27 10:04:09 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26341]: CRITICAL: dialog
[dlg_hash.c:1098]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 5 in state 4 for dlg
0x7fceeabf8d38 [749:3185] with clid
'SDceked01-e4d2e93d7f9ffe88907206a25ccdbcc2-v300g00030' and tags
'SDceked01-ecd4281b' '14001358846426'
Behaviour in the call:
When I look at the SIP flow from this call I can see that a PRACK
message which is routed to Kamailio gets discarded (=the proxy does
not route the PRACK onwards to the UA that requested the usage of the
100rel in 183 session progress message.) The PRACK message itself
seems valid and when compared to a PRACK from a working call, there is
no difference in the content.
Cheers,
Olli
Greetings,
Does the statistics command "kamcmd tm.stats" has an argument or a way to
only list locally generated replies?
As far as i know, sl.stats only lists local generated replies. Can tm work
the same way?
Best Regards,
Duarte Rocha
Hey guys,
I need help to identify the cause of this is error:
Jun 26 12:03:53 ashintgtpsg51 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1651]: ERROR: tm
[t_fwd.c:1728]: t_forward_nonack(): no branches for forwarding
This message was shortly printed after I xlog a message in onsend_route[]
block. What else is strange is that the dialog continued on with that same
SIP Call-ID.
This is what it looks like in the wireshark flow diagram:
[image: image.png]
The dispatcher entry is an SRV record which lists available hosts.
Any thoughts on how I can identify the cause of this?
Thanks.
--
Andy Chen
Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer
415 516 5535 (M)
achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com
--
*Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any
attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or
any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the
contents to any other person. Thank you.*
Hello,
When using TOPOS module, Kamailio add this header : P-SR-XBranch before executing the topos module.
Doing this "remove_hf_re("P-")" in the scripting seems to bypass the addition of the P-SR-XBranch in the sip message.
In my mind, remove header function just remove the headers based on the incoming message.
What do you think ?
Hi,
I have found a behavior in the registrar module that I do have a question about. Is the current behavior correct and wanted?
Using the save() method in the script I see the following:
* Processing a register request for a user gives return code 1 ( or 2 )
* Processing a unregister request (expires=0) for registered user gives return code 3
* Processing a unregister request (expires=0) for a user which is NOT registered gives return code 1. Why?
What is the reason behind this?
No database entry is added which is expected.
Test performed on 5.1.4, using DB mode 3.
For handling a late unregister request ( where registration has already expired) return code does not reflect the the action.
I assume that manually checking $expires(max) is the option to go then if I want to detect the unregister request or?
Cheers,
Lars
hi
i m using kamailio 5.1 , on Ubuntu 18.4
and right now i m using Maria DB for kamailio , but i want to migrate my
Maria data to MingoDB ,, plz help me how can i use MOngoDB with kamailio
thanks
--
*Regards:*
Gaurav Kumar
