sr-users May 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

84 participants
101 discussions

BYE relays Digest and others in Proxy-Authorization header
by Sergiu Pojoga 19 May '19

19 May '19

Hi ppl, Noticed BYE requests relayed from caller to callee have the *Proxy-Authorization* header including *Digest*, *nonce* and *response*. Is that by SIP definition or am I doing something wrong? My concern is the callee gets to see caller's authentication credentials. Thanks.

4 6

Centos7 Packages
by Matt Lamer 18 May '19

18 May '19

I am trying to install the kam server on centos7. When running the install I get the following: Install 5 Packages (+2 Dependent packages) Total size: 14 M Total download size: 14 M Installed size: 63 M Downloading packages: Delta RPMs disabled because /usr/bin/applydeltarpm not installed. kamailio-debuginfo-5.2.2-7.el7 FAILED http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home%3A/kamailio%3A/v5.2.x-rpms/C…: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Anyone else having this issue?

2 1

"If you're struggling with your Tele callers to improve sales? you're not alone.
by Prakash 17 May '19

17 May '19

http://www.doocti.com +919790776655 Doocti Next Generation CTI for Smarter Sales Teams http://www.doocti.com Dear Customer, Greeting from Tevatel. Hope this mail finds you well. We are happy to announce the launch of our new product Doocti - Call center connector for crm What is Doocti? Doocti is a Computer telephony integration platform that can integrate your communication devices with your Helpdesk, CRM, and Other Key Tools. Increase agent productivity, improve customer experience and enable personalized service through deep customer insights at the point of interaction. Features of Doocti Single click Dial On-Screen Customer Profile Build on the Customer Profile Efficient Call Disposition Auto Dial Sticky Agent Feedback from the clients Reduce call time by 10-20 seconds per call Instantly retrieves and screen-pops customer related information Provides a better and more immediate response to the customers Offers a more personalized experience to the caller Dials out automatically and faster with a single mouse click Handles higher call volumes Increases first call resolution Intergrated with Currently we have associated with more than 20 brands. Curious to see what's under the hood? Enjoy a detailed look at the Doocti experience in a demo guided by a member of our team. Get a meeting on the calendar today. mailto:prakash.n@tevatel.com?subject=Need More Information about Doocti Request for a Demo [ mailto:prakash.n@tevatel.com?subject=Need More Information about Doocti ] Communications Simplified Contact Us: +919790776655 | prakash.n(a)tevatel.com No:76, Swamibakthan Street, Nammalwarpet, Chennai - 600012. www.tevatel.com | www.doocti.com http://viewstripo.email/?utm_source=templates&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign… ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent by prakash.n(a)tevatel.com to sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Not interested?Unsubscribe - https://tihk.maillist-manage.com/ua/optout?od=27218d28c96aa859ed0ac1287be0e… Update profile - https://tihk.maillist-manage.com/ua/upc?upd=164d3589027540e5&r=164d35890275… Asterfone technologies pvt ltd | Swamibakthan St, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Nammalwarpet, Ayanavaram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600010 Our Privacy Policy [ ] and Terms of Use. [ ]

2 1

rtpengine sessions on timeout not freeing up RTP ports
by Istvan Mogyorosi 17 May '19

17 May '19

Hello Another rtpengine related question after having successfully implemented a dispatcher configuration. Call flow is ok, everything works well until I tried to increase call volume. Kamailio log showing "proxy replied with error: Ran out of ports" In the beginning both channels are up, then I can see a teardown on the incoming channel loosing the ability to collect DTMF. Using the CLI tool I have statistics showing that none (!) of the calls are "regular terminated", they are on timeout. After experimenting with handling BYE, I ended up could getting a "regular terminated" call by using route[RELAY] .... if (is_method("BYE")) { rtpengine_delete(); } and then I can see some good things! Received command 'delete' from 127.0.0.1:58538 Scheduling deletion of call branch 'as65b95845' (via-branch '') in 5 seconds Replying to 'delete' from 127.0.0.1:58538 (elapsed time 0.000216 sec) Please correct me if I'm doing wrong this way! cheers Istvan

1 0

RFC: Kamailio command line parameters
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 May '19

17 May '19

Hello, a while ago I added support for long format parameter names for Kamailio command line. That's opening the door for more options to be set via command line arguments and I discovered that especially in a containerized environment, it is a trend to start applications using more command line parameters, than relying on config files. The current command line parameters are listed by: kamailio -h Use the master branch for it, because has many more than 5.2.x. Anyhow, the purpose of this message is to see if anyone else considers useful to add other command line parameters, and if yes, which ones. A typical candidate will be a global parameter that you have to change when relocating to/spinning up another Kamailio environment and you need to change the kamailio.cfg. Those that generate the interest of many people, can be easily added now. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

Testing the KEMI interpreters for functions with 4 and 5 parameters
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 May '19

17 May '19

Hello, because there were many variants not handled for KEMI functions with 4 and 5 parameters, I made a script to generate the code in order to be sure none is missing. The script was pushed in Kamailio repo at: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/master/misc/tools/kemi You don't have to use it, I listed it for reference, just in case the code needs adjustments in the future. If anyone is using a KEMI interpreter and has functions exported by Kamailio with 4 or 5 parameters, it would be appreciated if you can run some tests with master branch and report the results. All kemi interpreter modules were updated, so it doesn't matter which one you test. If the results are good, then the patches will be backported to branch 5.2, so there will be no case of unhanded functions with these numbers of parameters. The cases with up to 3 parameters were not affected. For 6 params, still only string values are handled. The other variants can be added, but I think they are not needed for the moment, so I tried to keep it small for the moment. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

Kamailio World thanks
by Daniel Pocock 16 May '19

16 May '19

Hi Daniel and Kamailio team, Well done on another successful Kamailio World in 2019. As usual, it was a great opportunity to meet people and learn new things. Regards, Daniel

2 1

siputils add_uri_param not available in KEMI python3
by Patrick Murphy 15 May '19

15 May '19

Hello, I am using the following version of Kamailio and using app_python3 with KEMI but I cannot find any exported function of add_uri_param from the siputils module. Any idea how I can perform: KSR.siputils.add_uri_param("name=value") ? version: kamailio 5.2.2 (x86_64/linux) 9260a2 Cheers, Pat.

1 1

Using a single virtual domain in a multi-domain setup
by Rhys Hanrahan 15 May '19

15 May '19

Hi All, I am trying to setup Kamailio to allow me to have multiple different domains (and IPs) treated as one. I am using the domain module for this. As an example I have: * A handset registered to Kamailio by IP address. * A SIP trunk between Asterisk and Kamilio using an FQDN that uses SRV records for redundancy on Asterisk's side. I have added all domains and IPs under the same "domain identifier". It seems the "old" domain module now uid_domain had this capability of a single virtual domain, but is this possible with the more current domain.so module? From what I've said the uid_* modules older modules from the SIP Router project, and should be replaced by more recent Kamailio modules? - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/uid_domain.html VS. - https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/domain.html MariaDB [kamailio]> select * from domain; +----+------------------------------------+------------+---------------------+ | id | domain | did | last_modified | +----+------------------------------------+------------+---------------------+ | 1 | 12.34.56.53 | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 2 | 23.34.56.54 | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 3 | sbc.foo | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 4 | sbc.nsw.foo | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 5 | sbc.vic.foo | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 6 | sbc.foo2 | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 7 | sbc.nsw.foo2 | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | | 8 | sbc.vic.foo2 | vocalpoint | 2000-01-01 00:00:01 | +----+------------------------------------+------------+---------------------+ 8 rows in set (0.000 sec) I managed to get registrations working by hardcoding a static realm in the config, but when when usrloc does a lookup on a handset, Kamailio can't find user(a)sbc.nsw.foo and Kamailio returns 404. It looks like this is because in the locations table it is listed with a domain of 12.34.56.53 (because the handset is registered by IP). How should this work normally? Or is it even possible? Thanks, Rhys.

2 4

Sip proxy for Asterisk with RFC3966 and 100Rel
by paolo.visnoviz＠vipcomputers.it 15 May '19

15 May '19

Dear Sirs, a telco provider give us a trunk that require 100rel and TEL RFC 3966. Usually we use Asterisk. Now Asterisk 16 with PJSIP support 100Rel, but not RFC3966, and they don't actually works to implement it. Asterisk chan_sip, instead, support RFC3966, but not 100Rel and is not actively developed on by Digium or Sangoma. So I'm stuck. Now, do you think it was possible to use Kamailio to act like a proxy sip but implementing RFC3966 for incoming and outgoing calls and RFC3966 and 100Rel for outgoing calls? And it is possible to connect all to an Asterisk server? Thank you in advance Best regards. Paolo Visnoviz

3 9

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2019